Journeying into Engineering Education Research

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendoerfer, C., R. Adams, P. Bell, and L. Fleming. 2007. Becoming an Engineering Education Researcher: Finding Pathways toward Interdisciplinarity. Accessed Apri 19, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265196341_Becoming_an_Engineering_Education_Researcher_Finding_Pathways_toward_Interdisciplinarity
   Google Scholar
• Baillie, C., and E. P. Douglas. 2014. “Confusions and Conventions: Qualitative Research in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (Class, Codes & Control Series Volume 5). Rev. ed. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bezerra Rodrigues, R. A., J. W. Paul, and J. Seniuk Cicek. 2021. “Entering the Discipline of Engineering Education Research: A Thematic Analysis.” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual (Long Beach, CA), July 26–29. https://peer.asee.org/37090
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, K., K. Willey, A. Gardner, S. Jose, R. Sharma, T. Sloan, L. Jolly, and B. Kloot. 2019. “Moving from Crime and Punishment to Success and Reward: Transitioning from Technical to Educational Research.” In Proceedings of the 8th Research in Engineering Education Symposium - REES 2019, Cape Town, South Africa, July 10–12. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/id/eprint/131807
   Google Scholar
• Bodnar, C., E. McCave, C. Smith-Orr, A. Coso Strong, C. Faber, and W. Lee. 2021. “Defining Academic Engineering Education Roles within the United States.” In Research in Engineering Education Symposium & Australasian Engineering Education Association Conference, Perth, WA, December 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Boklage, A., B. Coley, and N. Kellam. 2019. “Understanding Engineering educators’ Pedagogical Transformations Through the Hero’s Journey.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (6): 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1500999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M. 2007a. “Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (2): 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M. 2007b. “Development of Engineering Education as a Rigorous Discipline: A Study of the Publication Patterns of Four Coalitions.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00911.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., E. P. Douglas, and C. T. Amelink. 2009. “Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (1): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and L. K. Newswander. 2008. “Characteristics of Successful Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (2): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00962.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2002. “The Forms of Capital.” In Readings in Economic Sociology. N. W. Biggart, edited by 280–291. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1984. “Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: The Hidden Agenda.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1984 (23): 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842309.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, L. E., A. Chong, G. J. Evans, and L. Romkey. 2020. “Cultivating Disciplinary Expectations for Engineering Education Research in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 20 (1): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00078-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Engineering Education Association. n.d. CEEA-ACÉG Advanced Workshops. Canadian Engineering Education Association. Accessed May 23, 2023. https://ceea.ca/saturday-special-events/
   Google Scholar
• Coso Strong, A., C. Smith-Orr, C. Bodnar, W. Lee, E. McCave, and C. Faber. 2020. “Early Career Faculty Transitions: Negotiating Legitimacy and Seeking Support in Engineering Education.” Studies in Engineering Education 1 (1): 97. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.52.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, S., K. Blackmore, K. Willey, A. Gardner, S. Jose, R. Sharma, S. Trad, and L. Jolly. 2019. “Moving from Crime and Punishment to Success and Reward: Transitioning from Technical to Educational Research.” South African Society for Engineering Education. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/203881.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, S., S. Cunningham, A. Gregg, and A. Young. 2023. “Defining the Capabilities Required to Teach Engineering: Insights for Achieving the Australian Sector’s Future Vision.” Australasian Journal of Engineering 1–12. Education(This Issue). https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2214461.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, S., S. Trad, and K. Blackmore. 2021. “Navigating the Path from Technical Engineering to Engineering Education Research: A Conceptual Model of the Transition Process.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (6): 1076–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1992609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deters, J. R., T. K. Holloman, A. Pearson, and D. B. Knight. 2021. “Understanding Australian and United States Engineering Education Research (EER) Contexts Through the Eyes of Early-Career EER Researchers”. In Research in Engineering Education Symposium & Australasian Association of Engineering Education Conference, Perth, WA, December 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Deters, J. R., T. K. Holloman, A. Pearson, and D. B. Knight. 2023. “Understanding United States and Australian Engineering Education Research (EER) Contexts.” Australasian Journal of Engineering 1–10. Education(This Issue). https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2184911.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, E. P., M. Koro‐Ljungberg, and M. Borrego. 2010. “Challenges and Promises of Overcoming Epistemological and Methodological Partiality: Advancing Engineering Education Through Acceptance of Diverse Ways of Knowing.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (3): 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043791003703177.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., and K. Willey. 2015. “Engineering academics’ Identity Transitions in Becoming Established Engineering Education Researchers.” In Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Translating Research into Practice, Dublin, Ireland, July 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., and K. Willey. 2016. “Framing the Academic Identity of Emerging Researchers in Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (6): 2332–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., and K. Willey. 2019. “The Role of Peer Review in Identity Development for Engineering Education Researchers.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (3): 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1500526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison, A., and M. Heymann. 2012. “Historical Tensions in Engineering Education: European Perspectives.” In Philosophy of Engineering and Technology: Vol. 11. Engineering, Development and Philosophy: American, Chinese and European Perspectives, edited by S. Hyldgaard Christensen, C. Mitcham, B. Li, and Y. An, 183–196. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_11.
   Google Scholar
• Johri, A. 2010. “Creating Theoretical Insights in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (3): 183–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01055.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, N., and A. M. Cirell. 2018. “Quality Considerations in Qualitative Inquiry: Expanding Our Understandings for the Broader Dissemination of Qualitative Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 107 (3): 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, N., and M. Jennings. 2021. “Uncovering Epistemologies and Values of Our Qualitative Engineering Education Research Community: Listening for Voices.” Studies in Engineering Education 2 (1): 80. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.37.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, M., and J. M. Case. 2021. “Productive Tensions? Analyzing the Arguments Made About the Field of Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 111 (1): 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro‐Ljungberg, M., and E. P. Douglas. 2008. “State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (2): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00965.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. S., Y. Gamieldien, J. M. Case, and M. Klassen. 2022. “Institutionalizing Engineering Education Research: Comparing New Zealand and South Africa.” In S. Male and A. Guzzomi (edited by), 9th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2021) and 32nd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (REES AAEE 2021), Perth, Australia, December 5–8, 687–695. Research in Enineering Education Network (REEN). https://doi.org/10.52202/066488-0076
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1996. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Reprint ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leydens, J. A., B. Moskal, and M. J. Pavelich. 2004. “Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00789.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 2000. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.“ In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• London, J., A. Carberry, A. Ayela-Uwangue, E. Lee, M. Huerta, A. Rohini, W. Huang, K. Yasuhara, C. Allendoerfer, and S. N. Cruz. 2021. “The Pioneers’ Stories As A Tool For Introducing Graduate Students To The Engineering Education Research Community.“ Advances in Engineering Education 8 (3): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S., and C. Baillie. 2014. “Research-Guided Teaching Practices: Engineering Threshold Concepts as an Approach to Curriculum Renewal.” In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. A. Johri and B. M. Olds, edited by 393–408. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.026.
   Google Scholar
• Matemba, E., L. Parker, and L. Jolly. 2018. “Diversifying Methods in Educational Research: What We Learned at Winter School.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 23 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2018.1503779.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, D., S. Brown, and D. Shinew. 2014. “The Personal Epistemologies of Civil Engineering Faculty.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (3): 388–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D. F., and L. Jolly. 2003. “Dilemmas in Framing Research Studies in Engineering Education.” In Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, June 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D. 2017. “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit.” Engineering Studies 9 (3): 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seniuk Cicek, J., and M. Friesen. 2018. “Epistemological Tensions in Engineering Education Research: How Do We Negotiate Them?” 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, October 3–6, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659321
   Google Scholar
• Seniuk Cicek, J., R. Paul, P. K. Sheridan, and L. Kuley. 2020. “Researchers Explore Their Roles as Participant-Researchers in Characterizing the Lived Experiences of Graduate Students in Engineering Education Research in Canada: A Collaborative Autoethnography.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 20 (1): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00075-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, J. A., C. Allendoerfer, R. Adams, and B. Williams. 2016. “Integration of Scholarship: Interconnections Among Three Studies on Becoming an Engineering Education Researcher.” International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (6): 2352–2377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streveler, R. A., N. P. Pitterson, A. Hira, H. Rodriguez-Simmonds, and J. Ortega Alvarez. 2015. “Learning About Engineering Education Research: What Conceptual Difficulties Still Exist for a New Generation of Scholars?” In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Camino Real El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA, October 21–24, 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344303
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1993. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2 (1–2): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749282.
   Google Scholar
• van Note Chism, N., E. P. Douglas, and W. J. Hilson Jr. 2008. “Qualitative Research Basics: A Guide for Engineering Educators.“ https://eer.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/443/2019/08/Chism-Douglas-Hilson-Qualitative-Research-Basics-A-Guide-for-Engineering-Educators.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wint, N., and A. Nyamapfene. 2021. “Perspectives on Engineering Education Research in the UK: What is Being Done, Why, and for Whom?” In Research in Engineerin Education Symposium & Australasian Engineering Education Association Conference, Perth, WA, December 5–8.
   Google Scholar