Evidence Matters: Strategies for Ensuring Rigour in Designing, Doing, and Publishing Qualitative Research

References

• Bradbury-Jones, C., Breckenridge, J., Clark, M. T., Herber, O. R., Wagstaff, C., & Taylor, J. (2017). The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: A focused mapping review and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1270583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Harding, D., & Wells, R. (2022). Constant comparison analysis. In R. Lyons, L. McAllister, C. Carroll, D. Hersh, & J. Skeat (Eds.), Diving deep into qualitative data analysis in communication disorders research (pp. 79–100). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvette, A., Schick-Makaroff, K., & Molzahn, A. E. (2019). Open data in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406918823863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918823863
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M. R., Brown, A., Martin, D., Williams, M., Osborne, B., Basseal, J., Potter, M., Hardie, R.-A., Li, J., Thomas, J., & Georgiou, A. (2019). Interaction and innovation: Practical strategies for inclusive consumer-driven research in health services. BMJ Open, 9(12), e031555. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossett, L. A., Kaji, A. H., & Cochran, A. (2021). SRQR and COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative studies. JAMA Surgery, 156(9), 875–876. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyar, K. L. (2022). Qualitative inquiry in nursing: Creating rigor. Nursing forum (Hillsdale), 57(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi, M. A., & José Closs, S. (2015). Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 38(3), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0237-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herber, O. R., Bradbury-Jones, C., Böling, S., Combes, S., Hirt, J., Koop, Y., Nyhagen, R., Veldhuizen, J. D., & Taylor, J. (2020). What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01005-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, D., Azul, D., Carroll, C., Lyons, R., Mc Menamin, R., & Skeat, J. (2022). New perspectives, theory, method, and practice: Qualitative research and innovation in speech-language pathology. International Journal of SpeechLanguage Pathology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2029942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, D., Davies, K., Gallagher, A. L., Shadden, B. B., Strong, K., & Wylie, K. (2022). Thematic analysis. In R. Lyons, L. McAllister, C. Carroll, D. Hersh, & J. Skeat (Eds.), Diving deep into qualitative data analysis in communication disorders research (pp. 49–77). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, M., Witell, L., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Viewpoint: Getting your qualitative service research published. The Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2019-0444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2010). “Bet you think this song is about you”: Whose narrative is it in narrative research? [Keynote speech]. Narrative Matters 2010: Exploring the Narrative Landscape: Issues, Investigations and Interventions. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., Armstrong, E., Atherton, M., Brewer, K., Lowell, A., Maypilama, L., Rethfeldt, W., & Watermeyer, J. (2022). Cultural and linguistic considerations in qualitative analysis. In R. Lyons, L. McAllister, C. Carroll, D. Hersh, & J. Skeat (Eds.), Diving deep into qualitative data analysis in communication disorders research (pp. 277–318). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., & McAllister, L. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in communication disorders: An introduction for students and clinicians. J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., McAllister, L., Carroll, C., Hersh, D., & Skeat, J. (Eds.). (2022). Diving deep into qualitative analysis in communication disorders research. J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2020a). Introduction. In C. Pope & C. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 1–13). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2020b). Quality in qualitative research. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (4th ed., pp. 211–233). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, R., & McAllister, L. (2019). Qualitative research in communication disorders: an introduction for students and clinicians. J&R Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McMenamin, R., Isaksen, J., & Shiggins, C. (2022). Public and patient involvement in qualitative health and social care research. In R. Lyons, L. McAllister, C. Carroll, D. Hersh, & J. Skeat (Eds.), Diving deep into qualitative data analysis in communication disorders research (pp. 31–48). J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Z. J., Gregory, D., & Thibodeau, S. (2012). “Thanks for using me”: An exploration of exit strategy in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. British Medical Journal, 311, 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar