ChatGPT and its impact on education

References

• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., Bird, L., Fleming, J., Titterington-Giles, E., Edwards, E., & Leyland, C. (2021). Gravity assist: Propelling higher education towards a brighter future. Office for Students [blog]. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/gravity-assist-propelling-higher-education-towards-a-brighter-future/
   Google Scholar
• Bass, D. (2023, January 4). Microsoft hopes OpenAI’s chatbot will make Bing smarter. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-04/microsoft-hopes-openai-s-chatbot-will-make-bing-smarter
   Google Scholar
• Caren, C. (2023). The launch of Turnitin’s AI writing detector and the road ahead. Turnitin, 4 April. https://www.turnitin.com/blog/the-launch-of-turnitins-ai-writing-detector-and-the-road-ahead
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, C. (2023). Australian universities to return to ‘pen and paper’ exams after students caught using AI to write essays. The Guardian, 10 January 10. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-to-pen-and-paper-exams-after-students-caughtusing-ai-to-write-essays
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M. & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeedbackFruits. (n.d.). Automated feedback. https://feedbackfruits.com/automated-feedback
   Google Scholar
• Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by CHATGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. Digital Medicine, 6, 75. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
   Google Scholar
• Gordijn, B., & ten Have, H. (2023). ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 26(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Jiang, M., Nie, J., Ding, Y., Yue, J., & Wu, Y. (2023). How close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.07597
   Google Scholar
• Herskowitz, E. (2023). Microsoft Teams Premium: Cut costs and add AI-powered productivity. Microsoft, 1 February. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2023/02/01/microsoft-teams-premium-cut-costs-and-add-ai-powered-productivity/
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, S. (2023). China’s “laser rifle” burns clothes and skin. BBC, 8 December. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64970062
   Google Scholar
• Noorbehbahani, F., Mohammadi, A., & Aminazadeh, M. (2022). A systematic review of research on cheating in online exams from 2010 to 2021. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8413-8460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10927-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenAI. (2023). CHATGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (2005). The state of critical thinking today. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2005(130), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.193
   Google Scholar
• Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. Techrxiv [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2023, January 18). Microsoft in talks to invest $10 bln in ChatGPT-owner OpenAI, Semafor reports. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-talks-invest-10-bln-chatgpt-owner-semafor-2023-01-10/
   Google Scholar
• Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry? Nature, 9 December. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
   Google Scholar
• Susnjak, T. (2022). CHATGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292
   Google Scholar
• Technology for You. (2022). ChatGPT can fool humans even when it’s wrong, backs up assertions with fake quotes. Technology For You, 8 December. https://www.technologyforyou.org/chatgpt-can-foolhumans-even-when-its-wrong-backs-up-assertions-with-fake-quotes/
   Google Scholar
• van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: implications for education. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
   Google Scholar