Methodological issues on agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study

Mehdi Naderia Clinical Research Development Centre, Taleghani and Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, I.R. Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-6582 View further author information

Siamak Sabourb Department of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran;c Safety Promotions and Injury Prevention Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. IranCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

References

Nash SH, Day G, Hiratsuka VY, et al. Agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019 Dec;78(1):1571383. PubMed PMID: 30724720.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sabour S, Ghassemi F. The validity and reliability of a signal impact assessment tool: statistical issue to avoid misinterpretation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):1215–2. PubMed PMID: 27696610.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology beyond the basics. 3rd ed. Manhattan, New York: Jones and Bartlett Publisher; 2014.
Google Scholar
Sabour S, Dastjerdi EV. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs: a methodological error. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):848. PubMed PMID: 24132404.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Naderi M, Sabour S. Reproducibility of diagnostic criteria associated with atypical breast cytology: a methodological issue. Cytopathology. 2018 Aug;29(4):396. PubMed PMID: 29688593.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sabour S. Reliability of immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on fine-needle aspiration cytology samples of breast cancers: methodological issues. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016 Dec;44(12):1128–1129. PubMed PMID: 27491351.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Methodological issues on agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Methodological issues on agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date