Effects of lidar coverage and field plot data numerosity on forest growing stock volume estimation

References

• Astola, H., Häme, T., Sirro, L., Molinier, M., & Kilpi, J. (2019). Comparison of sentinel-2 and landsat 8 imagery for forest variable prediction in boreal region. Remote Sensing of Environment, 223, 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirici, G., Giannetti, F., McRoberts, R. E., Travaglini, D., Pecchi, M., Maselli, F., Chiesi, M., & Corona, P. (2020). Wall-to-wall spatial prediction of growing stock volume based on Italian National Forest Inventory plots and remotely sensed data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 84, 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAG.2019.101959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirici, G., McRoberts, R. E., Fattorini, L., Mura, M., & Marchetti, M. (2016). Comparing echo-based and canopy height model-based metrics for enhancing estimation of forest aboveground biomass in a model-assisted framework. Remote Sensing of Environment, 174, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran W. G., 1977. Sampling techniques, third edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, inc.
   Google Scholar
• Corona, P., Fattorini, L., Franceschi, S., Scrinzi, G., & Torresan, C. (2014). Estimation of standing wood volume in forest compartments by exploiting airborne laser scanning information: Model-based, design-based, and hybrid perspectives. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44(11), 1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0203
   Google Scholar
• D’Amico, G., Vangi, E., Francini, S., Giannetti, F., Nicolaci, A., Travaglini, D., Massai, L., Giambastiani, Y., Terranova, C., & Chirici, G. (2021). Are we ready for a National Forest Information System? State of the art of forest maps and airborne laser scanning data availability in Italy. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 14(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3648-014
   Google Scholar
• De Laurentis, D., Papitto, G., Gasparini, P., Di Cosmo, L., & Floris, A., 2021. Italian Forests, Selected results of the third National Forest Inventory INFC 2015. carabinieri command for the protection of biodiversity and parks. Available online: https://www.inventarioforestale.org/sites/default/files/datiinventario/pubb/Sintesi_INFC2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report (pp. 184). https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en
   Google Scholar
• Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P. L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R. D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G. L., Dwyer, J. L., Joseph Hughes, M., & Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOREST EUROPE, (2015). State of Europe's forest, FOREST EUROPE Liaison Unit Madrid: Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/soef_21_12_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Francini S, McRoberts R E, Giannetti F, Marchetti M, Scarascia Mugnozza G, and Chirici G. (2021). The Three Indices Three Dimensions (3I3D) algorithm: a new method for forest disturbance mapping and area estimation based on optical remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(12), 4693–4711. 10.1080/01431161.2021.1899334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francini S, McRoberts R E, Giannetti F, Mencucci M, Marchetti M, Scarascia Mugnozza G, and Chirici G. (2020). Near-real time forest change detection using PlanetScope imagery. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 53(1), 233–244. 10.1080/22797254.2020.1806734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannetti, F., Chirici, G., Gobakken, T., Næsset, E., Travaglini, D., & Puliti, S. (2018). A new approach with DTM-independent metrics for forest growing stock prediction using UAV photogrammetric data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 213, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.016. rse.2018.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin N R, Coops N C, and Culvenor D S. (2006). Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(2), 140–152. 10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire, T. G. (1998). Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: Appreciating the difference. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(10), 1429–1447. https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire, T. G., Næsset, E., McRoberts, R. E., Ståhl, G., Andersen, H.-E., Gobakken, T., Ene, L., & Nelson, R. (2016). Statistical rigor in Lidar-assisted estimation of aboveground forest biomass. Remote Sensing of Environment, 173, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R. J., & van Etten, J., 2012. raster: Geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.0-12. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S., Nelson, R., & Ståhl, G. (2017). Hybrid three-phase estimators for large-area forest inventory using ground plots, airborne lidar, and space lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 197, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Yu, X., & Maltamo, M. (2008). Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing. -, 29(5), 1339–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INFC. (2004).Il disegno di campionamento. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio. MiPAF - Direzione Generale per le Risorse Forestali Montane e Idriche, Corpo Forestale dello Stato. ISAFA, Trento, 36. https://www.inventarioforestale.org/sites/default/files/datiinventario/Sch_Cam.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowski M K, Guo Q, and Kelly M. (2013). Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 130, 245–253. 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, A., Astrup, R., Breidenbach, J., Fridman, J., Gobakken, T., Korhonen, K. T., Maltamo, M., Nilsson, M., Nord-Larsen, T., Næsset, E., & Olsson, H. (2018). Remote sensing and forest inventories in Nordic countries – Roadmap for the future. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33(4), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1416666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotivuori, E., Korhonen, L., & Packalen, P. (2016). Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models for volume, biomass and dominant height in Finland. Silva Fennica, 50(4), 1567. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefsky, M. A, Hudak, A. T, Cohen, W. B, & Acker, S. A. (2005). Geographic variability in lidar predictions of forest stand structure in the Pacific Northwest. Remote Sens. Environ, 95(4), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Quackenbush, L. J., & Im, J. (2019). Airborne lidar sampling strategies to enhance forest aboveground biomass estimation from Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161906
   Google Scholar
• Lisańczuk, M, Mitelsztedt, K, Parkitna, K, Krok, G, Stereńczak, K, Wysocka-Fijorek, E, & Miścicki, S. (2020). Influence of sampling intensity on performance of two-phase forest inventory using airborne laser scanning. Forest Ecosystems, 7(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00277-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, D., Chen, Q., Wang, G., Liu, L., & Li, G. (2016). A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9(1) , 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2014.990526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu D, Chen Q, Wang G, Moran E, Batistella M, Zhang M, Vaglio Laurin G, and Saah D. (2012). Aboveground Forest Biomass Estimation with Landsat and LiDAR Data and Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimates. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, 1–16. 10.1155/2012/436537
   Google Scholar
• Masek, J. G., Vermote, E. F., Saleous, N., Wolfe, R., Hall, F. G., Huemmrich, F., Gao, F., Kutler, J., & Lim, T. K. (2013). LEDAPS calibration, reflectance, atmospheric correction preprocessing code, version 2. model product. ORNL DAAC. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1146
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., Chen, Q., Domke, G. M., Ståhl, G., Saarela, S., & Westfall, J. A. (2016b). Hybrid estimators for mean aboveground carbon per unit area. Forest Ecology and Management, 378, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., Chen, Q., Walters, B. F., & Kaisershot, D. J. (2018). The effects of global positioning system receiver accuracy on airborne laser scanning-assisted estimates of aboveground biomass. Remote Sensing of Environment, 207, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E, Domke, G. M, Chen, Q, Næsset, E, & Gobakken, T, 2016a. Using genetic algorithms to optimize k-Nearest Neighbors configurations for use with airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 184, 387–395. 2016.7. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., Liknes, G. C., & Domke, G. M. (2014). Using a remote sensing-based, percent tree cover map to enhance forest inventory estimation. Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., Magnussen, S., Tomppo, E. O., & Chirici, G. (2011). Parametric, bootstrap, and jackknife variance estimators for the k-Nearest Neighbors technique with illustrations using forest inventory and satellite image data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12), 3165–3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., Naesset, E., & Gobakken, T. (2013). Accuracy and precision for remote sensing applications of nonlinear model-based inference. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2227299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts R E, Wendt D G, Nelson M D, and Hansen M H. (2002). Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81(1), 36–44. 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00330-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MITE - Italian Ministry of Ecological Transition, 2021. Ministerial decree of 09- 29-2021 online: https://www.mite.gov.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/PNRR/DEC%20398_29_9_2021%20(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Montaghi, A., Corona, P., Dalponte, M., Gianelle, D., Chirici, G., & Olsson, H. (2013). Airborne laser scanning of forest resources: An overview of research in Italy as a commentary case study. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, P., Vibrans, A. C., McRoberts, R. E., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Chirici, G., Mura, M., & Marchetti, M. (2017). Methods for variable selection in LiDAR-assisted forest inventories. Forestry, 90(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, M., Bottalico, F., Giannetti, F., Bertani, R., Giannini, R., Mancini, M., Orlandini, S., Travaglini, D., & Chirici, G. (2018). Exploiting the capabilities of the Sentinel-2 multi spectral instrument for predicting growing stock volume in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 66, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E. (2002). Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Holmgren, J., Hyyppä, H., Hyyppä, J., Maltamo, M., M, N., Olsson, H., Persson, Å., & Söderman, U. (2004). Laser scanning of forest resources: The nordic experience. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(6), 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580410019553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol, J. E., & Sarker, L. R. (2011). Improved biomass estimation using the texture para- meters of two high-resolution. Optical Sensors, 49(3), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2068574
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Nordkvist, K., Jonzén, J., Lindgren, N., Axensten, P., Wallerman, J., Egberth, M., Larsson, S., Nilsson, L., Eriksson, J., & Olsson, H. (2017). A nationwide forest attribute map of Sweden predicted using airborne laser scanning data and field data from the National Forest Inventory. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliarella, M. C., Sallustio, L., Capobianco, G., Conte, E., Corona, P., Fattorini, L., & Marchetti, M. (2016). From one-to two-phase sampling to reduce costs of remote sensing-based estimation of land-cover and land-use proportions and their changes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 184, 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puliti, S., Saarela, S., Gobakken, T., Ståhl, G., & Næsset, E. (2018). Combining UAV and Sentinel-2 auxiliary data for forest growing stock volume estimation through hierarchical model-based inference. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarela, S., Holm, S., Grafström, A., Schnell, S., Næsset, E., Gregoire, T. G., Nelson, R. F., & Ståhl, G. (2016). Hierarchical model-based inference for forest inventory utilizing three sources of information. Annals of Forest Science, 73(4), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0590-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarela, S., Holm, S., Healey, S. P., Andersen, H. E., Petersson, H., Prentius, W., Patterson, P. L., Næsset, E., Gregoire, T. G., & Ståhl, G. (2018). Generalized hierarchical model-based estimation for aboveground biomass assessment using GEDI and landsat data. Remote Sensing, 10(11) , 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarela S, Schnell S, Grafström A, Tuominen S, Nordkvist K, Hyyppä J, Kangas A, and Ståhl G. (2015). Effects of sample size and model form on the accuracy of model-based estimators of growing stock volume. Can. J. For. Res., 45(11), 1524–1534. 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0077
   Google Scholar
• Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (1992). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tabacchi, G., De Natale, F., Di Cosmo, L., Floris, A., Gagliano, C., Gasparini, P., Genchi, L., Scrinzi, G., & Tosi, V. (2007). Le stime di superficie 2005 - Prima parte. In Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio, ISAFA. Trento. 413.
   Google Scholar
• Tabacchi, G., Di Cosmo, L., Gasparini, P., & Morelli, S. (2011). Stima del volume e della fitomassa delle principali specie forestali italiene, Equazioni di previsione, tavole del volume e tavole della fitomassa arborea epigea(pp.415). 978-88-97081-11-1. https://www.inventarioforestale.org/sites/default/files/datiinventario/pubb/tavole_cubatura.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tompalski, P., White, J. C., Coops, N. C., & Wulder, M. A. (2019). Demonstrating the transferability of forest inventory attribute models derived using airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 227, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waser, L. T., Ginzler, C., & Rehush, N. (2017). Wall-towall tree type mapping from countrywide airborne remote sensing surveys. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. C., Coops, N. C., Wulder, M. A., Vastaranta, M., Hilker, T., & Tompalski, P. (2016). Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(5), 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. C., Wulder, M. A., Hobart, G. W., Luther, J. E., Hermosilla, T., Griffiths, P., Coops, N. C., Hall, R. J., Hostert, P, Dyk, A, & Guindon, L. (2014). Pixel-based image compositing for large-area dense time series applications and science. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(3), 192–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2014.945827
   Google Scholar
• Wulder M A, Bater C W, Coops N C, Hilker T, and White J C. (2008). The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. The Forestry Chronicle, 84(6), 807–826. 10.5558/tfc84807-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., Roy, D. P., Crawford, C. J., Masek, J. G., Woodcock, C. E., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., Belward, A. S., Cohen, W. B., Dwyer, J., Erb, A., Gao, F., Griffiths, P., Helder, D., Hermosilla, T., Hipple, J. D., Hostert, P., Hughes, M. J, Zhu, Z. (2019). Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 225, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, T., Jiang, K., Li, G., Eichhorn, M. P., Fan, J., Liu, F., Cao, L., An, F., & Cao, L. (2021). Individual tree crown segmentation from airborne LiDAR data using a novel Gaussian filter and energy function minimization-based approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 256, 112307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Lu, D., Wang, G., Wu, C., Huang, Y., & Yu, S. (2016). Examining spectral reflectance sa- turation in landsat imagery and corresponding solutions to improve forest above- ground biomass estimation. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar