Decentralized approach to logistics execution monitoring in multi-actor network

References

• Perego A, Perotti S, Mangiaracina R. ICT for logistics and freight transportation: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2011;41:457–483.10.1108/09600031111138826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RL, Soosay C, Kandampully J. Innovation in logistic services and the new business model: a conceptual framework. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2003;33:630–650.10.1108/09600030310499295
   Google Scholar
• Zunder T, Westerheim H, Jorna R, Pedersen JT. Is it possible to manage and plan co-modal freight transport without a centralised system? Int J Appl Logist. 2012;3:24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Marchet G, Perego A, Perotti S. An exploratory study of ICT adoption in the Italian freight transportation industry. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2009;39:785–812.10.1108/09600030911008201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen M, Ala-Risku T, Främling K. Efficient tracking for short-term multi-company networks. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2004;34:545–564.10.1108/09600030410552249
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä J. From supply to demand chain management: Efficiency and customer satisfaction. J Oper Manag. 2002;20:747–767.10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagell M. Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J Oper Manag. 2004;22:459–487.10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbe-Costes N, Jahre M. Supply chain integration improves performance: The emperor’s new suit? Int J Phys Distr Log. 2007;37:835–855.
   Google Scholar
• Huang ZM, Li SX, Mahajan V. An analysis of manufacturer-retailer supply chain coordination in cooperative advertising. Decis Sci. 2002;33:469–494.10.1111/deci.2002.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra A, de Vries J. Managing stakeholders around inter organizational systems. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2008;17:190–201.10.1016/j.jsis.2008.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkka V, Främling K, Tätilä J. Supply chain tracking: aligning buyer and supplier incentives. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2013;113:1133–1148.10.1108/IMDS-12-2012-0439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS. Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice. J Manag Account Res. 1998;1998:89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kasanen E, Lukka K, Siitonen A. The constructive approach in management accounting. J Manag Account Res. 1993;5:89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Oyegoke A. The constructive research approach in project management research. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 2011;4:573–595.10.1108/17538371111164029
   Google Scholar
• Permala A, Pilli-Sihvola E, Mattheis S, Scholliers J, Vedovato D, Gyftodimos E, Dallas J, Schilk G, Rantasila K. Assessment and forecasting of e-Freight technologies. e-Freight project deliverable D1.2. 2011. [Cited 2014 Jul 24]. Available from: http://www.efreightproject.eu/uploadfiles/e-Freight%20D1.2%20Assessment%20and%20forecasting%20of%20e-Freight%20technologies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Christopher M. Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing cost and improving service. 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lummus RR, Vokurka RJ. Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Ind Manage Data Syst. 1999;99:11–17.10.1108/02635579910243851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper MC, Lambert DM, Pagh JD. Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. Int J Logist Manag. 1997;8:1–14.10.1108/09574099710805556
   Google Scholar
• Power D. Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply Chain Manag. 2005;10:252–263.10.1108/13598540510612721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajogo D, Olhager J. Supply chain integration and performance: the effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Int J of Prod Econ. 2012;135:514–522.10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LR, Esper TL, Ozment J. The electronic supply chain: its impact on the current and future structure of strategic alliances, partnerships and logistics leaderships. Int J Phys Distr Log. 2002;32:703–719.10.1108/09600030210444935
   Google Scholar
• Wu I-L, Chuang C-H. Examining the diffusion of electronic supply chain management with external antecedents and firm performance: a multi-stage analysis. Decis Support Syst. 2010;50:103–115.10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, van Donk DP, van der Vaart T. Does ICT influence supply chain management and performance? A review of survey-based research. Int J Oper Prod Man. 2011;31:1215–1247.10.1108/01443571111178501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wijngaert L, Versendaal J, Matla R. Business IT alignment and technology adoption; the case of RFID in the logistics domain. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res. 2008;3:71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen TJ, Paganelli P, Knoors F, Meyer-Larsen N, Davidsson P. One common framework for information and communication systems in transport and logistics. Brussels: DiSCwise project deliverable; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaguru R, Matanda MJ. Effects of inter-organizational compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration. Ind Mark Manag. 2013;42:620–632.10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission [Internet]. Mobility and transport: European strategies. European Commission; 2009 [cited 2014 Jul 24]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/strategies/studies/strategies_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Damsgaard J, Truex D. The procrustean bed of standards: binary relations and the limits of EDI standards. Eur J Inform Syst. 2000;9:173–188.10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselbring W, Weigand H. Languages for electronic business communication: state of the art. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2001;101:217–227.10.1108/02635570110394644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofreiter B, Huemer C, Ja-Hee K. Choreography of ebXML business collaborations. Inf Syst eBus Manag. 2006;4:221–243.10.1007/s10257-005-0016-3
   Google Scholar
• OASIS [Internet]: Universal business language version 2.1. OASIS. November 2013 [cited 2014 May 4]. Available from: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
   Google Scholar
• Vinoski S. REST eye for the SOA guy. IEEE Internet Comput. 2007;11:82–84.10.1109/MIC.2007.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• e-Freight [Internet]. Brussels: e-Freight: a concrete step forward and the call for policy action. European Commission; 2013 November 5 [cited 2014 Jul 24]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/newsletters/2013/12-06/articles/e-freight_en.htm
   Google Scholar