Isolation and Characterization of Human Foot Crack–Associated Bacterium, Pseudomonas Otitidis, and Its Biological Propensity

References

• Sattanathan G, Ramasubramanian V. Identification and natural control measures of bacterial isolates from the foot crack of human being. Int J Instit Pharm Life Sci. 2014;4(3):8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dange SV, Grandhi. S. Clinical efficacy of foot care cream in the management of foot cracks. Indian Med J. 2009;103(10):350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Synthetic reviews of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Complem Alterned. 2001;1(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony RM, Noble WC, Pitcher DG. Characterisation of aerobic non-lipophilic coryneforms from human feet. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992;17(2):102–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson RS, Hanson TE. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:439–471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anesti V, Vohra J, Goonetilleka S, et al. Molecular detection and isolation of facultatively, methylotrophic bacteria, including Methylobacterium podarium.sp. nov., from the human foot microflora. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6(8):820–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anesti V, Mcdonald IR, Ramaswamy M, et al. Isolation and molecular detection of methylotrophic bacteria occurring in the human mouth. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1227–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg S, Cardash H, Browning H, et al. Isolation of Enterobacteriaceae from the mouth and potential association with malodor. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1770–1775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irie Y, Parsek MR. Quorum sensing and microbial biofilms. In: Romeo T, editor. Bacterial biofilms. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sonkusale KD, Tale VS. Isolation and characterization of biofilm forming bacteria from oral microflora. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;2:118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatan E, Watnick P. Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(2):310–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer DD, Stoodley P. Microbial biofilms. Prokaryotes. 2006;1:904–937.
   Google Scholar
• Davey ME, O’Toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:847–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Paul D, Jain RK. Biofilms: implications in bioremediation. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halan B, Buehler K, Schmid A. Biofilms as living catalysts in continuous chemical syntheses. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:453–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obi SKC, Krakowiaka A. Theory and practice of food microbiology (Unpublished manual). 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S, et al. Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of Staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24(1):25 29.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, et al. Adherence of biofilm producing strains of Staphylococci epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun. 1982;37:318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthik C, Oves M, Thangabalu R, et al. Cellulosimicrobium funkei -like enhances the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris by modulating oxidative damage under chromium (VI) toxicity. J Adv Res. 2016;7:839–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhao C, Zhou J, et al. Isolation purification and identification of bacteria from the shoes worn by children. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(20):4133–4137.
   Google Scholar
• Wan MB. American anthrax situation and development of popular. Epidemiol Infect Dis. 2001;28(6):2531.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce E, Susan L. Recent advances in the development of an improved human anthrax vaccine. Eur J Epidemiol. 1988;4(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausen M, Heydorn A, Ragas P, et al. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:1511–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafoor A, Hay ID, Rehm BH. Role of exopolysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and architecture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:5238–5246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:1140–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain K, Parida S, Mangwani N, et al. Isolation and characterization of biofilm-forming bacteria and associated extracellular polymeric substances from oral cavity. Ann Microbiol. 2013;63(4):1553–1562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Santra SC. Isolation and characterization of bacteria isolated from municipal solid waste for production of industrial enzymes and waste degradation. J Microbiol Exp. 2014;1(1):1:8.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh S, Mathivanan N. Screening of marine actinomycetes isolated from the Bay of Bengal, India for antimicrobial activity and industrial enzymes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;25(12):2103–2111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami S, Alikhani HA, Besharati H, et al. Investigation on aerobic cellulolytic bacteria in some of north forest and farming soils. Amer Eurasian J Agri Environ Sci. 2008;3(5):713–716.
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Chakraborty A, Ghosh S, et al. Studies on the effect of pH and carbon sources on enzyme activities of some pectinolytic bacteria isolated from jute retting water. Turk J Biol. 2011;35:671–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen L, Estrada-de Los Santos P, Sandra M, et al. Promysalin, a salicylate containing Pseudomonas putida antibiotic, promotes surface colonization and selectively targets other Pseudomonas. Chem Biol. 2011;18:1320–1330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobayashi S, Hodaka S, Kawamura Y, et al. Micacocidin A, B & C, novel antimycoplasma, agents from Pseudomonas sp. J Antibiotics. 1998;51(3):323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinho PR, Moreira AP, Pellegrino FL, et al. Marine Pseudomonas putida: a potential source of antimicrobial substances against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro. 2009;104(5):678–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid R, Usup G, Ahmad A. Antimicrobial activity of bacteria associated with various marine sources. Adv Environ Biol. 2013;7:356–366.
   Google Scholar
• Ignacio PC, Judith B, Katrin D, et al. Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida and related species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:2279–2290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT. Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81:537–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoetendal EG, Heilig HG, Klaassens ES, et al. Isolation of DNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):870–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark LL, Dajc JJ, McLean CH, et al. Pseudomonas otitidis.sp. nov., isolated from patients with otic infections. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:709–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar