Simulation and experimental study of grid-connected photovoltaic power plants in a hot desert climate with fixed and dual-axis tracking

References

• Zaghba L, Khennane M, Fezzani A, et al. Experimental outdoor performance evaluation of photovoltaic plant in a Sahara environment (Algerian desert). Int J Ambient Energ. 2022;43(1):314–324. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2019.1636865
   Google Scholar
• Zaghba L, Khennane M, Mekhilef S, et al. Experimental outdoor performance assessment and energy efficiency of 11.28 kWp grid tied PV systems with sun tracker installed in saharan climate: a case study in Ghardaia, Algeria. Solar Energy. 2022;243:174–192. ISSN 0038-092X. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim I-S. Sliding mode controller for the single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic system. Appl Energy. 2006;83(10):1101–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borni A, Bouchakour A, Zaghba L, et al. Optimization of the fuzzy MPPT controller by PSO for the single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic system controlled by sliding mode. 2018 6th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), 1-7, IEEE Xplore; 2019 May 2; Rabat, Morocco. doi: 10.1109/IRSEC.2018.8702873.
   Google Scholar
• Zaghba L, Borni A, Khennane M, et al. Modeling and simulation of novel dynamic control strategy for grid connected photovoltaic systems under real outdoor weather conditions using fuzzy–PI MPPT controller. Int J Model Simulat. 2023;43(5):549–558. doi: 10.1080/02286203.2022.2094663
   Google Scholar
• Rashwan A, Mikhaylov A, Hemeida M, et al. Two-stage grid-connected inverter topology with high frequency link transformer for solar PV systems. Energy Rep. 2023;10:1864–1874. ISSN 2352-4847. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey M, Gupta N, Mohan Garg M, et al. A comprehensive review of grid-connected solar photovoltaic system: architecture, control, and ancillary services. Renew Energy Focus. 2023;45:307–330. ISSN 1755-0084. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2023.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Babu PC, Kumar DG, Sireesha NV, et al. Modeling and performance analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic system with advanced controller considering varying environmental conditions. Int J Energy Res. 2023;2023:1631605. doi: 10.1155/2023/1631605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath Kumar D, Gandhi O, Rodríguez-Gallegos CD, et al. Review of power system impacts at high PV penetration part II: potential solutions and the way forward. Solar Energy. 2020;210:202–221. ISSN 0038-092X. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaghba L, Borni A, Khennane M, et al. Experimental typical meteorological years to study energy performance of a PV grid-connected system. Energy Procedia. 2017;119:297–307. ISSN 1876-6102. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.085
   Google Scholar
• Nsengiyumva W, Chen SG, Hu L, et al. Recent advancements and challenges in Solar Tracking Systems (STS): a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81:250–279. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez S, Rodrigo PM, Alvarez J, et al. Development and testing of a single-axis photovoltaic sun tracker through the internet of things. Energies. 2020;13(10):2547. doi: 10.3390/en13102547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Uceda FJ, Ramirez-Faz J, Varo-Martinez M, et al. New omnidirectional sensor based on open-source software and hardware for tracking and backtracking of dual-axis solar trackers in photovoltaic plants. Sensors. 2021;21(3):726. doi: 10.3390/s21030726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce-Jara MA, Velásquez-Figueroa C, Reyes-Mero M, et al. Performance comparison between fixed and dual-axis sun-tracking photovoltaic panels with IoT monitoring system in the coastal region of Ecuador. Sustainab. 2022;14(3):1696. doi: 10.3390/su14031696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldin SAS, Abd-Elhady MS, Kandil HA. Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels in hot and cold regions. Renew Energy. 2016;85:228–233. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirdelen T, Alıcı H, Esenboğa B, et al. Performance and economic analysis of designed different solar tracking systems for Mediterranean climate. Energies. 2023;16(10):4197. doi: 10.3390/en16104197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim SO, Khalil Almadani I, Ghazi Hariri N, et al. Experimental investigation and comparison of the net energy yield using control-based solar tracking systems. Inter J Photoenergy. 2022;2022(14). Article ID 7715214. doi: 10.1155/2022/7715214
   Google Scholar
• Kuttybay N, Saymbetov A, Mekhilef S, et al. Optimized single-axis schedule solar tracker in different weather conditions. Energies. 2020;13(19):5226. doi: 10.3390/en13195226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saymbetov A, Mekhilef S, Kuttybay N, et al. Dual-axis schedule tracker with an adaptive algorithm for a strong scattering of sunbeam. Solar Energy. 2021;224:285–297. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan MMA, Mahmood T. Optimization of maximum power point tracking flower pollination algorithm for a standalone solar photovoltaic system. Mehran Univ Res J Eng Technol. 2020;39:267–278. doi: 10.22581/muet1982.2002.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthilkumar S, Mohan V, Mangaiyarkarasi SP, et al. Analysis of single-diode PV model and optimized MPPT model for different environmental conditions. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2022;2022:4980843. doi: 10.1155/2022/4980843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan MMA. Strategic perturb and observe algorithm for partial shading conditions: SP&O algorithm for PSC. Sir Syed Univ Res J Eng & Technol. 2022;12(2):26–32. doi: 10.33317/ssurj.497
   Google Scholar