Optimal energy scheduling for residential consumers with demand management strategies

References

• Chamandoust H, Derakhshan G, Bahramara S, et al. Multi-objective performance of smart hybrid energy system with multi-optimal participation of customers in day-ahead energy market. Energy Build. 2020;216:109964. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim MS, Kalf HAI, Farhan MA, et al. An empirical estimation of clean energy and financial development as determinants of sustainable development in Iraq. Cuadernos de Economía. 2023;46(131):125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamandoust H. Optimal hybrid participation of customers in a smart micro‑grid based on day‑ahead electrical market. Artif Intell Rev. 2022;55(7):5891–5915. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10154-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaluddin A. Nexus between green finance, renewable energy, and carbon emission: empirical evidence from Indonesia. AgBioForum. 2023;25(1):179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Alqasa KMA, Talat S. Moderating role of environmental governance policies in the relationship between attitude towards technology innovation and sustainability. AgBioforum. 2023;25(1):140–153.
   Google Scholar
• Mushi JM. The role of carbon pricing mechanisms and renewable energy technologies in reducing carbon emissions. Cuadernos de Economía. 2023;46(131):198–205. Available from: https://cude.es/submit-a-manuscript/index.php/CUDE/article/view/435/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang R, Wang S, Li H. Game theory based interactive demand side management responding to dynamic pricing in price-based demand response of smart grids. Appl Energy. 2019;250:118–130. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S. Analysis on the development path of green mining economy in the context of low carbon technology. J Comm Biotech. 2023;28(2).
   Google Scholar
• Firouz MH, Ghadimi N. Wind energy uncertainties in multi-objective environmental/economic dispatch based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. UCT J Res Sci Eng Tech. 2015;3(3):8–15. doi: 10.24200/jrset.vol3iss03pp8-15
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MS. Towards machine learning-based demand response forecasting using smart grid data. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Nsaif AD, Hamza HK, Abd M, et al. Revisiting the role of financial development in energy-growth-environment nexus in Iraq. Cuadernos de Economía. 2023;46(131):104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamandoust H, Bahramara S, Derakhshan G, et al. Multi-objective operation of smart stand-alone microgrid with the optimal performance of customers to improve economic and technical indices. J Energy Storage. 2020;31:101738. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhang T, Peng X, et al. A novel long-term power forecasting based smart grid hybrid energy storage system optimal sizing method considering uncertainties. Inf Sci (NY). 2022;610:326–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towoju OA. Impact of adopting diesel-CNG dual-fuel engine on haulage. Int J Sustain Energy Environ Res. 2022;11(1):37–42. doi: 10.18488/13.v11i1.2996
   Google Scholar
• Lak Kamari M, Isvand H, Alhuyi Nazari M. Applications of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in renewable energy development: A review. Renew Energy Res Appl. 2020;1(1):47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamandoust H, Bahramara S, Derakhshan G. Multi-objective operation of smart stand-alone microgrid with the optimal performance of customers to improve economic and technical indices. J Energy Storage. 2020;31:101738. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler E, Yerel Kandemir S. Assessment of wind power plant potentials via MCDM methods in marmara region of Turkey. Renew Energy Res Appl. 2021;2(2):157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad HAE, Attia MEHA, Selvaraj K. Comparative study of conventional solar still with low-cost energy storage materials: energy and exergy study. Iranian J Chem Eng. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Lü S, Leng Y, et al. Optimal household energy management based on smart residential energy hub considering uncertain behaviors. Energy. 2020;195:117052. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi MS, Nezhad AE, Nardelli PHJ, et al. Self-scheduling model for home energy management systems considering the end-users discomfort index within price-based demand response programs. Sustain Cit Soc. 2021;68:102792. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Bie Z, Xie H, et al. Customer satisfaction based reliability evaluation of active distribution networks. Appl Energy. 2016;162:1571–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonellato G, Heidari A, Pereira J, et al. Optimal design and operation of a building energy hub: a comparison of exergy-based and energy-based optimization in Swiss and Italian case studies. Energy Conver Manage. 2021;242:114316. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norouzi N, Bozorgian A. Energy and exergy analysis and optimization of a pentageneration (cooling, heating, power, water and hydrogen). Iran J Chem Chem Eng. 2023.
   Google Scholar