Train running safety on non-ballasted bridges

References

• Zhai W, Wang K, Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2009;47(11):1349–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antolín P, Zhang N, Goicolea J, et al. Consideration of nonlinear wheel-rail contact forces for dynamic vehicle-bridge interaction in high-speed railways. J Sound Vib. 2013;332(5):1231–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai W, Wang S, Zhang N, et al. High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions - part II: experimental validation and engineering application. Int J Rail Transport. 2013;1(12):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro P. A methodology for the assessment of the train running safety on bridges Doctoral thesis. University of Porto; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Xia H, Zhang N. Dynamic analysis of railway bridge under high-speed trains. Comp Struct. 2005;83(23–24):1891–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo W, Xia H, Zhang N. Dynamic responses of Tsing Ma bridge and running safety of trains subjected to Typhoon York. Int J Rail Transport. 2013;1(3):181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Ishida H, Matsuo M, Fujioka T. Safety assessment method of railway vehicle under oscillatory wheel load fluctuation. J Environ Eng. 2007;2(2):407–418.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai W, Liu P, Lin J, et al. Experimental investigation on vibration behaviour of a CRH train at speed of 350 km/h. Int J Rail Transport. 2015;3(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson T, Karoumi R. Train–bridge interaction – a review and discussion of key model parameters. Int J Rail Transport. 2016;2(3):147–186.
   Google Scholar
• Museros P, Castillo-Linares A, Alarcón E Wheel–rail contact forces in high-speed simply supported bridges at resonance. In: Topping BHV, CA MS, editors. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology. Civil-Comp Press, Stirling, Scotland; 2004. p. 1–20. Paper 223.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha JM, Henriques AA, Calçada R. Probabilistic assessment of the train running safety on a short-span high-speed railway bridge. Struct Infrastruct E. 2016;12(1):78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese National Railway Administration. Code for design of high speed railway bridges. TB 10621-2014, Beijing, 2014, in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• RTRI. Design standards for railway structures and commentary (displacement limits). Railway technical research institute, railway bureau of the ministry of land, infrastructure and transport government of Japan. Tokyo; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 1990/A1, basis of structural design annexe A2. European committee for standardization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zacher M, Baeßler M. Dynamic behaviour of ballast on railway bridges.In: Raimundo Delgado, Rui Calçada, José Maria Goicolea, Felipe Gabaldón (editors),  Dynamics of high-speed railway bridges. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. p. 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• ORED160. Permissible deflection of bridges. Office for research and experiments, RP 6 Final Report; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• ERRI D190. Permissible deflection of steel and composite bridges for velocities v > 160 km/h: parametric studies – summary and recommendations, Final report. European Rail Research Institute, RP 5; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Delgado R, et al. Finite-element model calibration of a railway vehicle based on experimental modal parameters. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2013;51(6):821–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson T, Andersson A. Train–track–bridge interaction for non-ballasted railway bridges on high-speed lines. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 2017. ( TRITA-BKN Report 165.).
   Google Scholar
• Nadal J. Locomotives à vapeur. Encyclopédie scientifique, Bibliothèque de mécanique appliquée et génie. O. Doin, Paris; 1908.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 14363, railway applications – testing and simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles – running behaviour and stationary tests. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Matsudaira T. Dynamics of high speed rolling stock. JNR RTRI Quarterly Reports, Special Issue; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 14067-6, railway applications – aerodynamics – part 6: requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Häggström J, Sima M, et al. Assessment of train-overturning risk due to strong cross-winds. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2004;218(3):213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIC. Application and experience with ballastless track. International Union of Railways, Paris; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Gu S, Zhou S, et al. Effect of track irregularity on the dynamic response of a slab track under a high-speed train based on the composite track element method. Appl Acoust. 2015;99:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia H. Dynamic analysis of high speed railway bridge under articulated trains. Comp Struct. 2003;81(26–27):2467–2478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha JM, Henriques AA, Calçada R. Probabilistic safety assessment of a short span high-speed railway bridge. Eng Struct. 2014;71:99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei X, Noda NA. Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile. J Sound Vib. 2002;258(1):147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou P. Finite element analysis for train–track–bridge interaction system. Arch Appl Mech. 2007;77(10):707–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh VN, Kim KD, Warnitchai P. Simulation procedure for vehicle–substructure dynamic interactions and wheel movements using linearized wheel–rail interfaces. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2009;45(5):341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantero D, Arvidsson T, OBrien E, et al. Train–track–bridge modelling and review of parameters. Struct Infrastruct E. 2016;12(9):1051–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MXD, Berggren EG, Berg M, et al. Assessing track geometry quality based on wavelength spectra and track-vehicle dynamic interaction. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46(1):261–276.
   Google Scholar
• Chaar N. Wheelset structural flexibility and track flexibility in vehicle–track dynamic interaction Doctoral thesis. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai W, Wang K, Lin J. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib. 2004;270(45):673–683.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 1991-2 actions on structures - part 2: traffic loads on bridges. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kouroussis G, Connolly D, Verlinden O. Railway-induced ground vibrations – a review of vehicle effects. Int J Rail Transport. 2014;2(2):69–110.
   Google Scholar
• DB. Requirements catalog for the construction of the permanent way, technical notification concerning the body of permanent way technology regulations. DB Systemtechnik, RO 03/2002 4th revised edition. Frankfurt; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Claus H, Schiehlen W. Modeling and simulation of railway bogie structural vibrations. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1986;29(1):538–552.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 13848-5, railway applications – track – track geometry quality – part 5: geo- metric quality levels – plain line, switches and crossings. European Committee for Stan- dardization, Brussels; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket. Banöverbyggnad - spårläge - krav vid byggande och underhåll [track super- structure - track alignment - requirements for construction and maintenance]. TDOK. 2013;0347(version 4):2015.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 13848-6, railway applications – track – track geometry quality – part 6: characterisation of track geometry quality. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Salcher P, Pradlwarter H, Adam C. Reliability assessment of railway bridges subjected to high-speed trains considering the effects of seasonal temperature changes. Eng Struct. 2016;126:712–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar