A multi-commodity network flow model for railway capacity optimization in case of line blockage

References

• Shakibayifar M, Sheikholeslami A, Corman F, et al. An integrated rescheduling model for minimizing train delays in the case of line blockage. Oper Res. 2017 Apr;1–29. First online. DOI:10.1007/s12351-017-0316-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Zegordi SH, Yaghini M. Train timetabling for an urban rail transit line using a Lagrangian relaxation approach. Appl Math Modell. 2016;40(23):9892–9913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghi M, Ghomi SMTF, Jolai F. Developing a robust multi-objective model for pre/post disaster times under uncertainty in demand and resource. J Clean Prod. 2017;154:188–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfeldt A. Railway capacity analysis [ PhD thesis]. KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Gao Z, Li K. Passenger train scheduling on a single-track or partially double-track railway with stochastic information. Eng Optim. 2010;42(11):1003–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogin S, Lai Y-C, Dick C, et al. Comparison of capacity of single-and double-track rail lines. Transp Res Rec. 2013;2374(2374):111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Shakibayifar M, Hassannayebi E, Jafary H, et al. Stochastic optimization of an urban rail timetable under time‐dependent and uncertain demand. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind. 2017;33(6):640–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakibayifar M, Hassannayebi E, Mirzahossein H, et al. An integrated train scheduling and infrastructure development model in railway networks. Sci Iran. 2017;24(6):3409–3422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontaxi E. Techniques and methodologies for railway capacity analysis: comparative studies and integration perspectives. In 5th International Scientific Conference "Theoretical and Practical Issues in Transport" (11-12 February 2010, Pardubice, Czech Republic); 2010 Feb 11–12; Czech Republic: The University of Pardubice.
   Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Zegordi SH. Variable and adaptive neighbourhood search algorithms for rail rapid transit timetabling problem. Comput Oper Res. 2017;78:439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Zegordi SH, Amin-Naseri MR, et al. Optimizing headways for urban rail transit services using adaptive particle swarm algorithms. Public Transp. 2018;10(1):23–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Zegordi SH, Yaghini M, et al. Timetable optimization models and methods for minimizing passenger waiting time at public transit terminals. Transp Plann Technol. 2017;40(3):278–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bababeik M, Nasiri MM, Khademi N, et al. Vulnerability evaluation of freight railway networks using a heuristic routing and scheduling optimization model. Transportation. 2017 Sep 02. DOI:10.1007/s11116-017-9815-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bababeik M, Khademi N, Chen A, et al. Vulnerability analysis of railway networks in case of multi-link blockage. Transp Res Procedia. 2017;22:275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Zegordi SH, Yaghini M, et al. Timetable optimization models and methods for minimizing passenger waiting time at public transit terminals. Transp Plann Technol. 2017;1–27. DOI:10.1080/03081060.2017.1283156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakibayifar M, Hassannayebi E, Mirzahossein H, et al. An intelligent simulation platform for train traffic control under disturbance. Int J Modell Simul. 2018;1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt LB, Pisinger D, Lusby R. Railway capacity and expansion analysis using time discretized paths. Flex Serv Manuf J. 2018;30(4):712–739.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen E, Merchant R. Scheduling of trains in a linear railway system. INFOR. 1981;19(3):246–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozan E, Burdett R. A railway capacity determination model and rail access charging methodologies. Transp Plann Technol. 2005;28(1):27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner T. Applicability of the analytical UIC Code 406 compression method for evaluating line and station capacity. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. 2011;1(1):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Landex A, Kaas AH, Schittenhelm B, et al. Evaluation of railway capacity. Trafikdage/Trafficdays. Selected Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University; 2006:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson L-G Railway capacity and train delay relationships. In: Alan T. Murray, and Tony H. Grubesic editors. Critical infrastructure. Switzerland AG: Springer; 2007. p. 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Abril M, Barber F, Ingolotti L, et al. An assessment of railway capacity. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2008;44(5):774–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Y-C, Barkan C. Enhanced parametric railway capacity evaluation tool. Transp Res Rec. 2009;2117(1):33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dingler M, Lai Y-C, Barkan C. Impact of train type heterogeneity on single-track railway capacity. Transp Res Rec. 2009;2117(1):41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landex A. Evaluation of railway networks with single track operation using the UIC 406 capacity method. Netw Spat Econ. 2009;9(1):7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrod S. Capacity factors of a mixed speed railway network. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2009;45(5):830–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajedinejad A, Mardani S, Hasannayebi E, et al., editors. SIMARAIL: simulation based optimization software for scheduling railway network. Simulation Conference (WSC), proceedings of the 2011 Winter; 2011; Phoenix, AZ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Eskandari H, Rahaee MA, Memarpour M, et al., editors. Evaluation of different berthing scenarios in Shahid Rajaee container terminal using discrete-event simulation. Proceedings of the 2013 winter simulation conference: simulation: making decisions in a complex world; 2013; Washington, DC: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Sajedinejad A, Mardani S. Urban rail transit planning using a two-stage simulation-based optimization approach. Simul Modell Pract Theory. 2014;49:151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilati G, Sheikholeslami A, Hassannayebi E. A simulation-based optimization approach for integrated port resource allocation problem. PROMET-Traffic&Transportation. 2014;26(3):243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouryousef H, Lautala P, White T. Railroad capacity tools and methodologies in the US and Europe. J Mod Transp. 2015;23(1):30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiji K, Naohiko H, Shigeru M. Simulation analysis of train operation to recover knock-on delay under high-frequency intervals. Case Stud Transp Policy. 2015;3(1):92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Y-C, Barkan CP. Comprehensive decision support framework for strategic railway capacity planning. J Transp Eng. 2011;137(10):738–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussone L, Calvo RW. An analytical approach to calculate the capacity of a railway system. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;228(1):11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverde RM, Corman F, D’Ariano A. Railway line capacity consumption of different railway signalling systems under scheduled and disturbed conditions. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. 2013;3(3):78–94.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghini M, Nikoo N, Ahadi HR. An integer programming model for analysing impacts of different train types on railway line capacity. Transport. 2014;29(1):28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröidh O, Sipilä H, Warg J. Capacity for express trains on mixed traffic lines. Int J Rail Trans. 2014;2(1):17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dingler MH, Lai Y-C, Barkan CP. Effect of train-type heterogeneity on single-track heavy haul railway line capacity. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2014;228(8):845–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Y-C, Liu Y-H, Lin Y-J. Standardization of capacity unit for headway-based rail capacity analysis. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol. 2015;57:68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen LW, Landex A, Nielsen OA, editors. Assessment of stochastic capacity consumption in railway networks. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (railtokyo2015); 2015. Narashino, Japan: Tsudanuma Campus, Chiba Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Fumasoli T, Bruckmann D, Weidmann U. Operation of freight railways in densely used mixed traffic networks–an impact model to quantify changes in freight train characteristics. Res Transp Econ. 2015;54:15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih M-C, Dick CT, Barkan CP. Impact of passenger train capacity and level of service on shared rail corridors with multiple types of freight trains. Transp Res Rec. 2015;2475(1):63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassannayebi E, Sajedinejad A, Mardani S Disruption management in urban rail transit system: a simulation based optimization approach. In: Umesh Rai B, editor. Handbook of research on emerging innovations in rail transportation engineering. IGI Global; 2016. p. 420–450. Pennsylvania: Hershey.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Nie L. Integrating capacity analysis with high-speed railway timetabling: a minimum cycle time calculation model with flexible overtaking constraints and intelligent enumeration. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol. 2016;68:509–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Y-C, Chen K-T. Evaluating service risk in railway capacity utilization using expected recovery time. J Transp Eng A Syst. 2017;143:04017016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen LW, Landex A, Nielsen OA, et al. Strategic assessment of capacity consumption in railway networks: framework and model. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol. 2017;74:126–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yu Y, Kang R, et al. A novel space-time-speed method for increasing the passing capacity with safety guaranteed of railway station. 2017: p. 2017. London, UK: Hindawi. DOI:10.1155/2017/6381718.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Jeong I-J, Park DJTRRJotTRB. Railway capacity allocation modeling using a genetic algorithm. Transport Resh Rec: J Transp Res Board. 2017;2608:115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Weik N, Nießen N. A quasi-birth-and-death process approach for integrated capacity and reliability modeling of railway systems. J Rail Transp Plann Manage. 2017;7(3):114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bešinović N, Goverde RM Capacity assessment in railway networks. In: Borndörfer R, Klug T, Lamorgese L, Mannino C, Reuther M, Schlechte editors. Handbook of optimization in the railway industry. Switzerland: Springer; 2018. p. 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Zhang X, Han B, et al. Carrying capacity and efficiency optimization model for freight train segment train. 2018 Mar. p. 1–14. Switzerland: Springer. First Online. DOI:10.1007/s10586-018-2444-0.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen J, Crainic TG, Christiansen M. Service network design with management and coordination of multiple fleets. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;193(2):377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chardaire P, McKeown GP, Verity-Harrison S, et al. Solving a time-space network formulation for the convoy movement problem. Oper Res. 2005;53(2):219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code U. 406. Capacity UIC leaflet ISBN. 2004. p. 2–7461.
   Google Scholar
• Gašparík J, Zitrický V. A new approach to estimating the occupation time of the railway infrastructure. Transport. 2010;25(4):387–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landex A. Methods to estimate railway capacity and passenger delays [PhD Thesis]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark (DTU Transport); 2008. Volume 5; Volume 2008 of Rapport. ISBN: 8773271837, 9788773271834.
   Google Scholar