Planning for a sustainable regional mobility: Hypertube Express (HTX) for Korean case

References

• Musk E. Hyperloop; 2013 [cited 2019 June 15]. (Accessed 2019 May 10) Available from: https://www.tesla.com/ko_KR/blog/hyperloop?redirect=no
   Google Scholar
• Decker K, Chin J, Peng A, et al. Conceptual feasibility study of the hyperloop vehicle for next-generation transport. Conference Paper, The 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 221–242; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelrahman AS, Sayeed J, Youssef MZ. Hyperloop transportation system: analysis, design, control, and implementation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2017;65(9):7427–7436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate LM, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A. Hyperloop transportation technologies: building breakthrough innovations in crowd-powered ecosystems. Harvard Business School Case. 817–839; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol W. What is the Hyperloop? Here’s everything you need to know; 2018 [cited 2018 June 02]. (Accessed 2018 May 09) Available from: https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/what-is-the-hyperloop/
   Google Scholar
• Drescher C. The 10 fastest trains in the world; 2018 [cited 2018 June 01]. (Accessed 2018 May 09) Available from: https://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2016-05-18/the-10-fastest-trains-in-the-world
   Google Scholar
• Hansen IA. Hyperloop transport technology assessment and system analysis. Transp Plann Technol. 2020;43(8):803–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett A, Munden G, Saat MR, et al. High-speed rail network design and station location: model and sensitivity analysis. Transportation Research Record. 2013;2374(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Seo K. Assessment of the basic plan of the Kyungbu High-Speed Rail. Seoul, S. Korea; 2000. p. 50.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski T, Rhyu S-Y, Croissant A. 2015 South Korea report. Germany: Sustainable Governence Indicators; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Korea Economic Institute. Korea’s economy. Seoul, Korea: Korea Economic Institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya S. What is HyperTube Express? South Korea to soon build a full scale Hyperloop system; 2017 [cited 2019 May 10].(Accessed 2019 May 10) Available from: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/what-hypertube-express-south-korea-soon-build-full-scale-hyperloop-system–1627162
   Google Scholar
• New Transportation Innovative Research Center. Hyper tube express (HTX) research team; 2018 [cited 2019 May 22]. (Accessed 2019 May 10) Available from: https://www.krri.re.kr/html/en/sub02/sub02_0201.html
   Google Scholar
• Spatial Decision Support Consortium. Spatial decision support consortium; 2018 [cited 2019 June 27]. (Accessed 2019 May 10) Available from: http://www.sdsconsortium.org/
   Google Scholar
• Mundia CN, Macharia PM. GIS analysis and spatial modelling for optimal oil pipeline route location. A case study of proposed Isiolo Nakuru pipeline route. Conference Paper, Sustainable Research and Innovation(SRI) Conference, Volume 5, p. 91–94; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan PB, Jankowski P. Spatial decision support systems: three decades on. Decis Support Syst. 2019;116:64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis C, Bernardini A. Reviewing the use of multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: time for a multi-actor approach. Transp Policy. 2015;37:177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H. Sustainable decision-making environment: institutional and technical improvements for spatial decision support systems. J Archit Plan Res. 2015;32(4):346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Lee HK. Enhanced validity and reliability of spatial decision support systems (SDSS) for sustainable transportation decision-making. Appl Geography. 2014;51:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggia A, Massei G, Pace E, et al. Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: a new model for decision making. Land Use Policy. 2018;71:281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit C, Bakelmun A, Lieske SN, et al. Planning support systems for smart cities. City Cult Soc. 2018;12:13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Grêt-Regamey A, Altwegg J, Sirén EA, et al. Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning—A spatial decision support tool. Landscape Urban Plann. 2017;165:206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willing C, Klemmer K, Brandt T, et al. Moving in time and space–Location intelligence for carsharing decision support. Decis Support Syst. 2017;99:75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H. Ecological valuation in a transportation project: value transfer and spatial decision support systems. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;11(8):2281–2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Koç Y, Derrible S, et al. Multi-criteria robustness analysis of metro networks. Phys A. 2017;474:19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Zhao H. Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge Based Syst. 2017;121:23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu P, Kar S, Maiti M. A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy variables and an application to transportation mode selection problem. Soft Comput. 2017;21(11):3051–3062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Wunneburger DF, Bright EM, et al. Texas urban triangle: pilot study to implement a spatial decision support system for sustainable mobility. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute; 2011. p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K, Eon J, Lee K. Socio-economic impacts of introducing HTX (hyper tube eXpress). J Korean Soc Urban Railw. 2019;7(1):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• KRRI. KRRI, the development of 1,200km/hr HTX Korea: KRRI; Sustainable Research and Innovation(SRI) Conference; 2018 [cited 2020 December 18]. Available from: https://www.krri.re.kr/_prog/_board/?mode=V&no=45672&code=sub06_0603&site_dvs_cd=kr&menu_dvs_cd=060201
   Google Scholar
• California High-Speed Rail Authority. High-speed train sound fact sheet. Sacramento, CA: California High-Speed Rail Authority; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan RA. Note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manage. 2001;63(1):27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. Scenarios and priorities in transport planning: application to the Sudan. Transp Res. 1977;11(5):343–350.
   Google Scholar
• Bright EM. The “ALLOT” model: a PC-based approach to siting and planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 1992;16(5):435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saisana M, Trarantola S. State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. Ispra, Italy: European Commission; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg M. Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar