Influence of wheelset rotational motion on train collision response and wheelset lift mechanism

References

• European committee for standardization. railway applications—crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies:EN 15227. London (UK): British Standards Institution; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Michal G, Nasir A, Yun S, et al. Crash energy management systems for Australian rolling stock. In: Dhanasekar, M. 2012, 1–67;Brisbane Qld 4001: The Australian Government‘s Cooperative Research Centres.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen K, Tyrell D, Severson K, et al. Crash energy management: one- and two-car passenger rail impact tests summary of structural and occupant test results. Washington DC 20590: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Xiao S, Lei C, et al. Rail vehicle crashworthiness based on collision energy management: an overview. Int J Rail Trans. 2021;9(2):101–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llana P, Stringfellow R. Full-scale dynamic testing of locomotive crashworthy components. Washington DC 20590: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner S, Cole C, Spiryagin M. A review on design and testing methodologies of modern freight train draft gear system. Railway Eng Sci. 2021;29(2):127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Lim S, Ji YH, Park YI. Simulation of energy absorption performance of the couplers in urban railway vehicles during a heavy collision. Machines. 2021;9(5):91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackiewicz J. Coupler force reduction method for multiple-unit trains using a new hierarchical control system. Railway Eng Sci. 2021;29(2):163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Bae HU, Yun KM, Lim NH. Containment capacity and estimation of crashworthiness of derailment containment walls against high-speed trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232(3):680–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Deng W, Xu P, et al. Study on the collision performance of a composite energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Thin Walled Struct. 2015;94:663–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskin SA, Acar E, Güler MA, et al. Exploring various options for improving crashworthiness performance of rail vehicle crash absorbers with diaphragms. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2021;64(5):3193–3208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac CW, Ezekwem C. A review of the crashworthiness performance of energy absorbing composite structure within the context of materials, manufacturing and maintenance for sustainability. Compos Struct. 2021;257:1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili-Marzdashti S. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of square and octagonal bitubal structures including different hole shapes. Thin Walled Struct. 2019;139:126–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar E, Altin M, Güler MA. Evaluation of various multi-cell design concepts for crashworthiness design of thin-walled aluminum tubes. Thin Walled Struct. 2019;142(C):227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Keni L G, Singh V, Singh N, et al. Conceptual design and analysis of a car bumper using finite element method. Cogent Eng. 2021;8(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Hou L, Che Q, et al. Multi-objective robust optimization design of a front-end underframe structure for a high-speed train. Eng Optim. 2019;51(5):753–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Carvalho M, Milho J, et al. A validated railway vehicle interior layout with multibody dummies and finite element seats models for crash analysis. Multibody Sys Dyn. 2021;54(2): 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guida M, Manzoni A, Zuppardi A, et al. Development of a multibody system for crashworthiness certification of aircraft seat. Multibody Sys Dyn. 2018;44(2):191–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MS, Martins AP, Milho J. Railway seat design for injury mitigation in crash scenario. Int J Rail Trans. 2020;8(3):215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Polach O, et al. Problems, assumptions and solutions in locomotive design, traction and operational studies. Railway Eng Sci. 2022. DOI:10.1007/s40534-021-00263-w.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Wang P, Ni W, et al. Energy absorption design for crash energy management passenger trains based on scaled model. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2022;65(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei L, Zhang L, Tong X, et al. Crashworthiness study of a subway vehicle collision accident based on finite-element methods. Int J Crashworthiness. 2021;26(2):159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazetic P, Tassin R, Ravalard Y, et al. Experimentation and modelling of climbing phenomena of guided transport vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 1995;209(1):11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Yang B, Yang C, et al. The mechanism for the coupler and draft gear and its influence on safety during a train collision. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(9):1375–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Li Q, Xiao S, et al. On the overriding issue of train front end collision in rail vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(4):506–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Mei M, Zhang J, et al. Investigations on the vertical buckling of railway vehicle’s anti-climber. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;2(1):171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bounds S. Report on dynamic behavior of the whole train in collisions and the improvement of the crashworthiness. Foreign Rolling Stock. 2017; 54(5): 1–7. (in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D. Passenger rail train-to-train impact test volume I: overview and selected results. Washington DC 20590: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Severson K, Zolock J, et al. Passenger rail two-car impact test volume I: overview and selected results. Washington DC 20590: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai W, Chen G. Method and criteria for evaluation of wheel derailment based on wheel vertical rise. J China Railway Soc. 2001; 23(2): 17–26. (in Chinese.
   Google Scholar