Elastic inclusions in ballasted tracks – a review and recommendations

References

• Indraratna B, Nimbalkar SS, Tennakoon N. The behaviour of ballasted track foundations: track drainage and geosynthetic reinforcement. GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design. 2010;2378–2387.
   Google Scholar
• Esveld C. Modern railway track. Vol. 385. Netherlands: MRT Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Hyslip J, Sussmann T, et al. Railway geotechnics. London: CRC Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mayuranga HGS, Navaratnarajah SK, Gimhani MMN. The effect of fouling materials on permeability behaviour of large size granular materials. In: Dissanayake R, Mendis P Weerasekera K, et al., editors. ICSBE 2020, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Vol. 174. Singapore: Springer; 2022. pp. 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B, Ngo NT. Influence of under sleeper pads on ballast behavior under cyclic loading: experimental and numerical studies. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2018;144(9):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo NT Performance of geogrids stabilised fouled ballast in rail tracks [PhD Thesis]: School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bian X, Li W, Qian Y, et al. Micromechanical particle interactions in railway ballast through DEM simulations of direct shear tests. Int J Geomech. 2019;19(5):1–19. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Xiao H, Wang M, et al. Research on dynamic mechanical behavior of ballast bed in windblown sand railway based on dimensional analysis. Constr Build Mater. 2021;287:123052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S, Coop M, et al. A constitutive model for coal-fouled ballast capturing the effects of particle degradation. Comput Geotech. 2014;61:96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Zhang Z, Chi Y, et al. Experimental study and discrete element analysis on dynamic mechanical behaviour of railway ballast bed in windblown sand areas. Constr Build Mater. 2021;304:124669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathali M, Nejad FM, Esmaeili M. Influence of tire-derived aggregates on the properties of railway ballast material. J Mater Civ Eng. 2016;29(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimbalkar S, Indraratna B, Dash S, et al. Improved performance of railway ballast under impact loads using shock mats. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2012;138(3):281–294. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutumluer E, Qian Y, Hashash YM, et al. Discrete element modelling of ballasted track deformation behaviour. Int J Rail Transp. 2013;1(1–2):57–73. DOI:10.1080/23248378.2013.788361
   Google Scholar
• Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B. Use of rubber mats to improve the deformation and degradation behavior of rail ballast under cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2017;143(6):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim W Deformation and degradation aspects of ballast and constitutive modelling under cyclic loading [PhD Thesis]: University of Wollongong; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo NT, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C. DEM simulation of the behaviour of geogrid stabilised ballast fouled with coal. Comput Geotech. 2014;55:224–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutumluer E, Huang H, Bian X. Geogrid-aggregate interlock mechanism investigated through aggregate imaging-based discrete element modeling approach. Int J Geomech. 2012;12(4):391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Biabani MM, Nimbalkar S. Behavior of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading in plane-strain condition. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2015;141(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Ngo NT, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling. Geotext Geomembr. 2011;29(3):313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi J, Kian ART, Ghiasinejad H, et al. Effectiveness of geogrid reinforcement in improvement of mechanical behavior of sand-contaminated ballast. Geotext Geomembr. 2020;48(6):768–779. DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navaratnarajah SK, Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S Performance of rail ballast stabilized with resilient rubber pads under cyclic and impact loading. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. Colombo, Sri Lanka2015. p. 617–620.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Mishra D, Tutumluer E, et al. Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modeling. Geotext Geomembr. 2015;43(5):393–402. DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo NT, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Stabilization of track substructure with geo-inclusions-experimental evidence and DEM simulation. Int J Rail Transp. 2017;5(2):63–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo T, Indraratna B, Ferreira F. Influence of synthetic inclusions on the degradation and deformation of ballast under heavy-haul cyclic loading. Int J Rail Transp. 2022;10(4):413–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Song W, Huang B, et al. Direct shear properties of railway ballast mixed with tire derived aggregates: experimental and numerical investigations. Constr Build Mater. 2019;200:465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Nielsen JCO, Bolmsvik R, et al. Under sleeper pads-influence on dynamic train-track interaction. Wear. 2008;265(9–10):1479–1487. DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakuši S, Ahac M, Haladin I Experimental investigation of railway track with under sleeper pad. Proceedings of the 10th Slovenian road and transportation congress. Portorož, Slovenia. 2010. p. 386–393.
   Google Scholar
• Sol-Sanchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez MC. The use of deconstructed tire rail pads in railroad tracks: impact of pad thickness. Mater Des. 2014;58:198–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadi T, Le Pen L, Zervos A, et al. Measuring the area and number of ballast particle contacts at sleeper/ballast and ballast/subgrade interfaces. Int J Railw Technol. 2015;4(2):45–72. DOI:10.4203/ijrt.4.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Navaratnarajah SK Application of rubber inclusions to enhance the stability of ballasted rail track under cyclic loading [PhD Thesis]: School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Sun Q, Grant J. Behaviour of subballast reinforced with used tyre and potential application in rail tracks. Transp Geotech. 2017;12:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Woodward PK, Medero G, et al. Reducing railway track settlement using three-dimensional polyurethane polymer reinforcement of the ballast. Constr Build Mater. 2013;44:615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya C, Indraratna B, Ngo TN. Experimental study to examine the role of under sleeper pads for improved performance of ballast under cyclic loading. Transp Geotech. 2019;19:61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol-Sánchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez M, et al. Full-scale study of Neoballast section for its application in railway tracks: optimization of track design. Mater Struct. 2018;51(2):1–11. DOI:10.1617/s11527-018-1167-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Q, Indraratna B, Grant J. Numerical simulation of the dynamic response of ballasted track overlying a tire-reinforced capping layer. Front Built Environ. 2020;6:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili M, Shamohammadi A, Farsi S. Effect of deconstructed tire under sleeper pad on railway ballast degradation under cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;136:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili M, Aela P, Hosseini A. Experimental assessment of cyclic behavior of sand-fouled ballast mixed with tire derived aggregates. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2017;98:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Salim W, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Advanced rail geotechnology: ballasted track. 1st ed. Rotterdam, Netherlands: CRC press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Selig ET, Waters JM. Track geotechnology and substructure management. London: Thomas Telford; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Nimbalkar S, Ngo NT, et al. Performance improvement of rail track substructure using artificial inclusions – experimental and numerical studies. Transp Geotech. 2016;8:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu M, McDowell G. The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method. Granul Matter. 2007;9(1–2):69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesh A, Palassi M, Mirghasemi AA. Evaluating the influence of ballast degradation on its shear behaviour. Int J Rail Transp. 2018;6(3):145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno L, Horvat M, Raffaele L. Windblown sand along railway infrastructures: a review of challenges and mitigation measures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2018;177:340–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z-H Z, Xiao H, Wang M, et al. Mechanical behavior and deformation mechanism of ballast bed with various fouling materials. J Cent South Univ. 2021;28(9):2857–2874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman F, Nissen D, editors Alternative testing method for the measurement of ballast fouling: percentage void contamination. CORE 2002, Cost Efficient Railways through Engineering, Conference on Railway Engineering, Wollongong, New South Wales; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tennakoon NC Geotechnical study of engineering behaviour of fouled ballast [PhD Thesis]: School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Shah S, Moaveni M, et al. Railway ballast permeability and cleaning considerations. Transp Res Rec. 2017;2607(1):24–32. DOI:10.3141/2607-05
   Google Scholar
• Ho CL, Humphrey D, Hyslip JP, et al. Use of recycled tire rubber to modify track–substructure interaction. Transp Res Rec. 2013;2374(1):119–125. DOI:10.3141/2374-14
   Google Scholar
• Nimbalkar S, Indraratna B. Improved performance of ballasted rail track using geosynthetics and rubber shockmat. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2016;142(8):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JCO, Johansson A. Out-of-round railway wheels - a literature survey. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2000;214(2):79–91. DOI:10.1243/0954409001531351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira F, Indraratna B. Deformation and degradation response of railway ballast under impact loading–effect of artificial inclusions. In Zhai, W, Wang, KC editors. ICRT 2017: railway Development, Operations, and Maintenance. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2018. p. 1090–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Alves Ribeiro C, Paixão A, Fortunato E, et al. Under sleeper pads in transition zones at railway underpasses: numerical modelling and experimental validation. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2014;11(11):1432–1449. DOI:10.1080/15732479.2014.970203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Sajjad MB, Ngo T, et al. Improved performance of ballasted tracks at transition zones: a review of experimental and modelling approaches. Transp Geotech. 2019;21:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Davis D. Transition of railroad bridge approaches. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2005;131(11):1392–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo TN, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Improved performance of ballasted tracks under impact loading by recycled rubber mats. Transp Geotech. 2019;20:100239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira P, López-Pita A. Numerical modeling of high-speed train/track system to assess track vibrations and settlement prediction. J Transp Eng. 2013;139(3):330–337.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakos K Influence of rail pad stiffness on track stressing, life-cycle and noise emission. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies: Università Politecnica delle Marche; 2010. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Grassie S, Cox S. The dynamic response of railway track with flexible sleepers to high frequency vertical excitation. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng. 1984;198(2):117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kaewunruen S, Remennikov AM. Sensitivity analysis of free vibration characteristics of an in situ railway concrete sleeper to variations of rail pad parameters. J Sound Vib. 2006;298(1–2):453–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent N, Bouvet P, Thompson D, et al. Theoretical optimization of track components to reduce rolling noise. J Sound Vib. 1996;193(1):161–171. DOI:10.1006/jsvi.1996.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt S. The influence of under sleeper pads on railway track dynamics. Sweden: Linköping University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pålsson BA, Nielsen JC. Dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness–field measurements and validation of a simulation model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(6):734–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol-Sanchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez MC. The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: a state of the art review. Constr Build Mater. 2015;75:293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadi T, Pen LL, Zervos A, et al. Effect of sleeper interventions on railway track performance. J Geotech Geoenviron. 2019;145(4):1–17. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari Baghsorkhi M, Laryea S, McDowell G, et al. An investigation of railway sleeper sections and under sleeper pads using a box test apparatus. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;230(7):1722–1734. DOI:10.1177/0954409715613818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol-Sanchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Rubio-Gámez MC. Viability of using end-of-life tire pads as under sleeper pads in railway. Constr Build Mater. 2014;64:150–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl W Improvement of balasted tracks using sleeper pads - investigations and experiences in Germany. Proceedings of the international conferences on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields. Trondheim, Norway; 2005. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg T. Railway track stiffness variations - consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civil Eng. 2010;8(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insa R, Salvador P, Inarejos J, et al. Analysis of the influence of under sleeper pads on the railway vehicle/track dynamic interaction in transition zones. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2012;226(4):409–420. DOI:10.1177/0954409711430174
   Google Scholar
• Ngamkhanong C, Kaewunruen S. Effects of under sleeper pads on dynamic responses of railway prestressed concrete sleepers subjected to high intensity impact loads. Eng Struct. 2020;214:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paixão A, Varandas JN, Fortunato E, et al. Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges. Eng Struct. 2018;164:169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewunruen S, Aikawa A, Remennikov AM. Vibration attenuation at rail joints through under sleeper pads. Procedia Eng. 2017;189:193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider P, Bolmsvik R, Nielsen JCO. In situ performance of a ballasted railway track with under sleeper pads. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011;225(3):299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Zakeri JA, Esmaeili M, Heydari-Noghabi H. A field investigation into the effect of under sleeper pads on the reduction of railway-induced ground-borne vibrations. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;230(3):999–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer F, Potvin R, Godart P, et al. Under sleeper pads in track – the UIC project. European Railway Review. 2013;19(2):2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bolmsvik R. Influence of USP on track response - a literature survey. Sweden: Abetong Teknik ABVäxjö; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Loy H. Under sleeper pads: improving track quality while reducing operational costs. European Railway Review. 2008;4:46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsworth B. Reducing groundborne vibrations: state-of-the-art study. J Sound Vib. 2000;231(3):703–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momoya Y, Takahashi T, Nakamura T. A study on the deformation characteristics of ballasted track at structural transition zone by multi-actuator moving loading test apparatus. Transp Geotech. 2016;6:123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves Costa P, Calçada R, Silva Cardoso A. Ballast mats for the reduction of railway traffic vibrations. numerical study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2012;42:137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auersch L. Dynamic axle loads on tracks with and without ballast mats: numerical results of three-dimensional vehicle-track-soil models. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2006;220(2):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettschureck R Ballast mats in tunnels-analytical model and measurements. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Munich, Germany. Vol. 1985: Institute of Noise Control Engineering; 1985. p. 721–724.
   Google Scholar
• Fontserè V, Pita AL, Manzo N, et al. NEOBALLAST: new high-performance and long-lasting ballast for sustainable railway infrastructures. Transp Res Proc. 2016;14:1847–1854.
   Google Scholar
• Sol-Sanchez M, Thom N, Moreno-Navarro F, et al. A study into the use of crumb rubber in railway ballast. Constr Build Mater. 2015;75:19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol-Sánchez M, Moreno-Navarro F, Martínez-Montes G, et al. An alternative sustainable railway maintenance technique based on the use of rubber particles. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:3850–3858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Qi Y, Heitor A. Evaluating the properties of mixtures of steel furnace slag, coal wash, and rubber crumbs used as subballast. J Mater Civ Eng. 2018;30(1). DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Indraratna B, Heitor A, et al. The influence of rubber crumbs on the energy absorbing property of waste mixtures. Geotechnics for transportation infrastructure. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Indraratna B. Energy-based approach to assess the performance of a granular matrix consisting of recycled rubber, steel-furnace slag, and coal wash. J Mater Civ Eng. 2020;32(7):04020169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohmishi M, Azarhoosh A. Hydraulic conductivity of fresh railway ballast mixed with crumb rubber considering size and percentage of crumb rubber as well as aggregate gradation. Constr Build Mater. 2020;241:118133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Chang J, Feng H. Laboratory study on degradation of ballast mixed with crumb rubber under impact loads. Int J Rail Transp. 2022;1–23. DOI:10.1080/23248378.2022.2108151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili M, Siahkouhi M. Tire‐derived aggregate layer performance in railway bridges as a novel impact absorber: numerical and field study. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019;26(10):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq MA, Nimbalkar S, Fatahi B. Sustainable applications of tyre-derived aggregates for railway transportation infrastructure. Sustainability. 2022;14(18):11715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Indraratna B. Influence of rubber inclusion on the dynamic response of rail track. J Mater Civ Eng. 2022;34(2):04021432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili M, Ataei S, Siahkouhi M. A case study of dynamic behaviour of short span concrete slab bridge reinforced by tire-derived aggregates as sub-ballast. Int J Rail Transp. 2020;8(1):80–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Sun Q, Heitor A, et al. Performance of rubber tire-confined capping layer under cyclic loading for railroad conditions. J Mater Civ Eng. 2018;30(3):1–7. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boler H. On the shear strength of polyurethane coated railroad ballast. University of Illinois; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dersch MS, Tutumluer E, Peeler CT, et al. Polyurethane coating of railroad ballast aggregate for improved performance. Joint Rail Conference. Urbana, Illinois, USA. 2010. p. 337–342.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Lee SJ, Park JG, et al. An experimental study on the characteristics of polyurethane-mixed coarse aggregates by large-scale triaxial test. Constr Build Mater. 2017;145:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundavaram D, Hussaini SKK. Performance evaluation of polyurethane-stabilized railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Constr Build Mater. 2020;255:119304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing G, Zhang X, Jia W. Lateral resistance of polyurethane-reinforced ballast with the application of new bonding schemes: laboratory tests and discrete element simulations. Constr Build Mater. 2019;221:627–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene A, Edil T, Tinjum J. Mitigating ballast fouling and enhancing rail freight capacity. Madison, Wisconsin: National Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education (US); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Keene A, Tinjum J, Edil T. Mechanical properties of polyurethane-stabilized ballast. Geotechnical Engineering Journal. 2014;45(1):66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward P, Kennedy J, Medero G, et al. Application of in situ polyurethane geocomposite beams to improve the passive shoulder resistance of railway track. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2012;226(3):294–304. DOI:10.1177/0954409711423460
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S, Woodward P, Laghrouche O. Influence of stiffening ballasted track bed overlying a masonry arch bridge using a polyurethane polymer material. Constr Build Mater. 2015;92:111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling X, Xiao H, Cui X. Analysis of mechanical properties of polyurethane-mixed ballast based on energy method. Constr Build Mater. 2018;182:10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling X, Xiao H, Liu G, et al. Discrete element modeling of polyurethane-stabilized ballast under monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading. Constr Build Mater. 2020;255:119370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward PK, Thompson D, Banimahd M Geocomposite technology: reducing railway maintenance. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport. Vol. 160: Thomas Telford Ltd; 2007. p. 109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglikov A, Yavna V, Ermolov Y, et al. Strengthening of the railway ballast section shoulder with two-component polymeric binders. Transp Geotech. 2017;11:133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing G, Qie L, Markine V, et al. Polyurethane reinforced ballasted track: review, innovation and challenge. Constr Build Mater. 2019;208:734–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol-Sánchez M, D’Angelo G. Review of the design and maintenance technologies used to decelerate the deterioration of ballasted railway tracks. Constr Build Mater. 2017;157:402–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundavaram D, Hussaini SKK. Polyurethane-based stabilization of railroad ballast–a critical review. Int J Rail Transp. 2019;7(3):219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward P, Kennedy J, Laghrouche O, et al. Study of railway track stiffness modification by polyurethane reinforcement of the ballast. Transp Geotech. 2014;1(4):214–224. DOI:10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Zhai W, Wang K, Lin J. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib. 2004;270(4–5):673–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Ngo T, Ferreira FB, et al. Laboratory examination of ballast deformation and degradation under impact loads with synthetic inclusions. Transp Geotech. 2020;25:100406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Lackenby J, Christie D. Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading. Geotechnique. 2005;55(4):325–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig ET, Li D. Track modulus: its meaning and factors influencing it. Transp Res Rec. 1994;(1470):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pita AL, Teixeira PF, Robusté F. High speed and track deterioration: the role of vertical stiffness of the track. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2004;218(1):31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germonpré M, Nielsen J, Degrande G, et al. Contributions of longitudinal track unevenness and track stiffness variation to railway induced vibration. J Sound Vib. 2018;437:292–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombaert G, Degrande G, François S. Ground-borne vibration due to railway traffic: a review of excitation mechanisms, prediction methods and mitigation measures. In: Nielsen J, Anderson D Gautier P-E, et al., editors. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Vol. 126. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. pp. 253–287.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson GP, Saurenman HJ, Nelson JT. Control of ground-borne noise and vibration. J Sound Vib. 1983;87(2):339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves Costa P, Calçada R, Silva Cardoso A. Track–ground vibrations induced by railway traffic: in-situ measurements and validation of a 2.5D FEM-BEM model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2012;32(1):111–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIC. Recommendations for the use of under ballast mats. In: UIC Code 719-1. 1st ed. VII Way and Works. Paris, France: International Union of Railways. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Marsal R. Mechanical properties of rockfill, in embankment-dam engineering. Hirschfeld R Poulos S, editors. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1973. pp. 109–200.
   Google Scholar
• Arachchige CM, Indraratna B, Qi Y, et al. Geotechnical characteristics of a rubber intermixed ballast system. Acta Geotech. 2022;17(5):1847–1858. DOI:10.1007/s11440-021-01342-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Markine V, Qiang W, et al. Effects of crumb rubber size and percentage on degradation reduction of railway ballast. Constr Build Mater. 2019;212:210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai X, Zhong Y, Hao X, et al. Dynamic behavior of a polyurethane foam solidified ballasted track in a heavy haul railway tunnel. Adv Struct Eng. 2019;22(3):751–764. DOI:10.1177/1369433218799154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Wang F, Wang P, et al. Effect of temperature-and frequency-dependent dynamic properties of rail pads on high-speed vehicle–track coupled vibrations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(3):351–370. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2016.1267371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Cai C, Luo Z, et al. A frequency and amplitude dependent model of rail pads for the dynamic analysis of train-track interaction. Sci China Technol Sci. 2015;58(2):191–201. DOI:10.1007/s11431-014-5686-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainz-Aja JA, Carrascal IA, Ferreño D, et al. Influence of the operational conditions on static and dynamic stiffness of rail pads. Mech Mater. 2020;148:103505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setsobhonkul S, Kaewunruen S, Sussman JM. Lifecycle assessments of railway bridge transitions exposed to extreme climate events. Front Built Environ. 2017;3:35.
   Google Scholar
• Simón D, Borreguero A, De Lucas A, et al. Recycling of polyurethanes from laboratory to industry, a journey towards the sustainability. Waste Manage. 2018;76:147–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Qi Y, Malisetty RS, et al. Recycled materials in railroad substructure: an energy perspective. Railw Eng Sci. 2022;30(3):304–322. DOI:10.1007/s40534-021-00267-6
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna B, Qi Y, Tawk M, et al. Advances in ground improvement using waste materials for transportation infrastructure. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv. 2022;175(1):3–22. DOI:10.1680/jgrim.20.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohajerani A, Burnett L, Smith JV, et al. Recycling waste rubber tyres in construction materials and associated environmental considerations: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;155:104679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualtieri M, Andrioletti M, Vismara C, et al. Toxicity of tire debris leachates. Environ Int. 2005;31(5):723–730. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizian MF, Nelson PO, Thayumanavan P, et al. Environmental impact of highway construction and repair materials on surface and ground waters: case study: crumb rubber asphalt concrete. Waste Manage. 2003;23(8):719–728. DOI:10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00024-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imteaz M, Mohammadinia A, Arulrajah A. Environmental suitability, carbon footprint and cost savings of recycled plastic for railway applications. Int J Sustain Eng. 2021;14(4):725–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar