The regional primary elections in Italy: a general overview

References

• Aldrich, J. H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246–278. doi:10.2307/2111531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, D. 2013. “Universal Party Primaries and General Election Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay (1999-2009).” Parliamentary Affairs 66: 834–855. doi:10.1093/pa/gss010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. H., and M. Kaase. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Basili, M., and D. Fracchiolla. 2010. “I votanti: il profilo sociologico.” In Il partito democratico di Bersani. Persone, profilo e prospettive, edited by G. Pasquino and F. Venturino, 159–174. Bologna: Bonomia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 2013. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, J., R. Sinnott, and P. Svensson. 1998. People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy, and Legitimacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., and J. E. McNulty. 2011. “Turning Out to Vote: The Costs of Finding and Getting to the Polling Place.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 115–134. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., and J. Polga-Hecimovich. 2006. “Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America.” Journal of Politics 68: 530–543. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartocci, R. 2007. Mappe del tesoro. Atlante del capitale sociale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaramonte, A., and A. Di Virgilio. 2000. “Le elezioni regionali del 2000: la frammentazione si consolida, le alleanze si assestano.” Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. doi:10.1426/1671.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, M., and S. Grimaldi. 2014. “Il profilo sociografico dei selettori e la scelta del candidato.” In Il Partito Democratico secondo Matteo, edited by G. Pasquino and F. Venturino, 117–132. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, M., M. Jones, and M. I. Tula. 2006. “Machine Politics and Party Primaries: The Uses and Consequences of Primaries within a Clientelist Political System.” Paper presented at the Conference of the Mobilizing Democracy Group of the American Political Science Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150. doi:10.1086/257897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini, A., and F. Venturino. 2012. “Le primarie comunali, 2004-2011: una descrizione basata su dati aggregati.” In Primarie per il sindaco. Partiti, candidati, elettori, edited by A. Seddone and M. Valbruzzi, 1–30. Milano: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., and S. B. Hobolt. 2010. “Coalition Government and Electoral Accountability.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. 2013. “Tentativi di rottamazione degli elettori del PD. Il profilo sociologico dei votanti.” In Perdere vincendo. Dal successo delle primarie del 2012 all’impasse post-elettorale, eds B. Gelli, T. Mannarini, and C. Talò, 109–123. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Haspel, M., and H. Knotts. 2005. “Location, Location, Location: Precinct Placement and the Costs of Voting.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 560–573. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichino, N., and N. L. Nathan. 2013. “Do Primaries Improve Electoral Performance? Clientelism and Intra‐Party Conflict in Ghana.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 428–441. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00624.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. 2008. “Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce More Competitive Contests?.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 240–247. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “’Effective’ Number of Parties. A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzone, M. E., and S. Rombi. 2014. “Who Did Participate in the Online Primary Elections of the Five Star Movement (M5s) in Italy? Causes, Features and Effects of the Selection Process.” Partecipazione e Conflitto 7 (1): 170–191.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, L., R. G. Niemi, and P. Norris. 1996. Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. 1995. “Political Parties, Popular Legitimacy and Public Privilege.” West European Politics 18 (3): 40–57. doi:10.1080/01402389508425090.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, L. W. 1965. Political Participation: How and Why do People Get Involved in Politics?. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E. 1992. “The Puzzle Transformed: Explaining Declining Turnout.” Political Behavior 14 (1): 1–43. doi:10.1007/BF00993507.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E., and J. M. Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G. 1976. “Costs of Voting and Nonvoting.” Public Choice 27 (1): 115–119. doi:10.1007/BF01718955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala, C., and S. Rombi. 2014. Fallire per vincere. Il centrosinistra sardo dalle primarie alle elezioni regionali 2014. Novi Ligure: Epoké.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” The American Political Science Review 80 (1): 17–43. doi:10.2307/1957082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/ejpr.1980.8.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H., and P. C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 25–42. doi:10.2307/1953324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rombi, S., and M. Valbruzzi. 2015. “Luci e ombre delle primarie regionali.” In Tripolarismo e destrutturazione. Le elezioni regionali del 2015, edited by S. Bolgherini and S. Grimaldi, 129–154. Bologna: Istituto Cattaneo.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, S. J., and J. M. Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. 1980. “On the Costs, Utilities, and Simple Joys of Voting.” The Journal of Politics 42 (3): 854–863. doi:10.2307/2130557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo, S. 2005. “Le elezioni regionali del 2005. Alternanze, personalizzazione e ricambio.” Le istituzioni del federalismo 6: 987–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Venturino, F. 2007. “Le primarie nazionali dell’Unione: un’analisi della partecipazione con dati aggregati.” Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 37 (3): 435–457. doi:10.1426/25717.
   Google Scholar
• Venturino, F. 2009. “Le primarie comunali dell’Unione, 2004-2007.” In Le primarie comunali in Italia, edited by G. Pasquino and F. Venturino, 7–45. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar