Italian parties and the digital challenge: between limits and opportunities

References

• Asbjørn., F., M. R. Johannessen, and L. Marika. 2014. “The Role of a Political Party Website: Lessons Learnt from the User Perspective.” In Electronic Participation. ePart 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and F. Bannister. Vol. 8654, 52–63. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Philippi, J. 2015. Using Technology, Building Democracy. Digital Campaigning and the Construction of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S., and P. Mair. 2001. “Challenges to Contemporary Political Parties.” In Political Parties and Democracy, edited by L. Diamond and R. Guhnter, 327–343. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W., and A. Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action. Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentivegna, S. 1999. La Politica in Rete. Roma: Meltemi.
   Google Scholar
• Bentivegna, S. 2001. “La prova generale del 2001: Candidati ed elettori nel mare di Internet.” Comunicazione Politica II (2): 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bentivegna, S. 2006. Campagne elettorali in rete. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. 2003. Information and American Democracy. Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biorcio, R., ed. 2015. Gli attivisti del Movimento 5 stelle: Dal web al territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Biorcio, R., and P. Natale. 2013. Politica a 5 stelle: Idee, storia e strategie del Movimento di Grillo. Milano: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Bordignon, F., and L. Ceccarini. 2019. “Five Stars, Five Years, Five (Broken) Taboos.” In The Italian General Election of 2018. Italy in Uncharted Territory, edited by L. Ceccarini and J. L. Newell, 139–163. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2018. If … Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., and E. Pavan. 2019. ““Designing Anticipatory Policies through the Use of ICTs.” Policy and Society 38 (1): 96–117. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1511194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepernich, C. 2009. “The New Technologies: The First Internet 2.0 Election.” In The Italian General Election of 2008. Berlusconi Strikes Back, edited by J. L. Newell, 171–189. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cepernich, C. 2017. Le campagne elettorali al tempo della networked politics. Laterza: Bari-Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Ceri, P., and F. Veltri. 2017. Il movimento nella rete: Storia e struttura del Movimento 5 Stelle. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2007. “Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity.” Political Communication 24 (3): 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., and D. Freelon, ed. 2015. Handbook of Digital Politics. Cheltenham, Northampton: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, P., and E. Gualmini. 2013. Il partito di Grillo. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Cristopher., C., and R. Bracciale. 2019. “Digital Hyperleaders: Communication Strategies on Social Networks at the 2019 European Elections.” Italian Political Science 14 (2): 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., and M. P. Wattenberg, ed. 2000. Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Landtsheer, C., N. Krasnoboka, and C. Neuner. 2005. “Participation Friendliness of Political Websites in Eastern and Western Europe.” In Democratization, Europeanization and Globalization Trends, edited by R. F. Farnen, H. Dekker, C. De Landtsheer, H. Sünker, and D. B. German, 325–360. Berlin: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosa, R. 2000. Fare Politica in Internet. Milano: Apogeo.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and L. Mosca. 2009. “SEARCHING THE NET: Web Sites’ Qualities in THE Global Justice Movement.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (6): 771–792. doi:10.1080/13691180802109063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deseriis, M. 2020. “Two Variants of the Digital Party: The Platform Party and the Networked Party.” Partecipazione e Conflitto 13 (1): 896–917. doi:10.1285/i20356609v13i1p896.898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2019a. The Digital Party. Political Organisation and Online Democracy. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2019b. “Are Digital Parties More Democratic than Traditional Parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle’s Online Decision-making Platforms.” Party Politics, November 2019: 1–13. doi:10.1177/1354068819884878.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., K. Gillan, F. Greffet, B. J. Lee, and S. Ward. 2012. “Party Organizational Change and ICTs: The Growth of a Virtual Grassroots?” New Media & Society 15 (1): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., P. Nixon, and S. Ward, ed. 2003. Political Parties and the Internet. Net Gain? London-New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., and S. Ward. 2009. “Parties in the Digital Age — A Review Article.” Representation 45 (9): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Helmond, A. 2015. “The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready.” Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., S. Vissers, D. Stolle, and M. Valérie-Anne. 2010. “The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts.” Political Communication 27 (4): 406–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson, F., S. Le, and J. Pagès. 2017. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Karolina, K.-M., and D. G. Lilleker. 2018. Digital Politics: Mobilization, Engagement and Participation. London–New. York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. 2012. The MoveOn Effect. The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and J. Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17 (8): 1241–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2012. Taking Our Country Back. The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2016. Prototype Politics. Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. New York-London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., and S. C. Mcgregor. 2018. “Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with Campaigns during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle.” Political Communication 35 (2): 155–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, G., and P. J. Maarek. 2015. Political Parties in the Digital Age. The Impact of News Technologies in Politics. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter–Oldenboourg.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, R. 2016. “La modernisation du porte-à-porte au Parti Socialiste. Réinvention d’un répertoire de campagne et inerties militantes.” Politix 113 (1): 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Liégey, G., A. Muller, and V. Pons. 2013. Port-á-port. Reconquérir la démocratie sur le terrain. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., K. Koc-Michalska, E. J. Schweitzer, M. Jacunski, N. Jackson, and T. Vedel. 2011. “Informing, Engaging, Mobilizing or Interacting: Searching for a European Model of Web Campaigning.” European Journal of Communication 26 (3): 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., and M. Casilda. 2010. “Levels of Interactivity in the 2007 French Presidential Candidates’ Websites.” European Journal of Communication 25 (1): 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobera, J., and M. Portos. April 2020.“Decentralizing Electoral Campaigns? New-old Parties, Grassroots and Digital Activism, Information.” Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. 1999. “New Frontiers in Political Professionalism.” Political Communication 7 (3): 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. 2015. Il postpartito. La fine delle grandi narrazioni. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. Social Structure and Social Theory. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, L. 2009. Joining Political Organizations. Institutions, Mobilisation and Participation in Western Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, L., and C. Vaccari, ed. 2015. Nuovi media, nuova politica? Partecipazione e mobilitazione online da MoveOn al Movimento 5 stelle. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2001. “Digital Parties. Civic Engagement & Online Democracy.” Paper at ECPR Joint Sessions, Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., D. Hilgers, and M. Rapp. 2019. “Political Innovation, Digitalisation and Public Participation in Party Politics.” Policy & Politics 47 (3): 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E. J. 2008. “Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning?: A Longitudinal Content and Structural Analysis of German Party Websites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections.” European Journal of Communication 23 (4): 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorey, S., and P. N. Howard. 2016. “Automation, Algorithms, and Politics.” International Journal of Communication 10: 24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solo, A. M. G. 2015. “The New Fields of Public Policy Engineering, Political Engineering, Computational Public Policy, and Computational Politics.” In Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2250–2257. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. 2014. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. 2014. “Engineering the Public. Engineering the Public: Big Data, Surveillance and Computational Politics.” First Monday 19 (7). doi:10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. 2008a. “Research Note: Italian Parties’ Websites in the 2006 Elections.” European Journal of Communication 23 (1): 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. 2008b. “Più informazione che partecipazione: I siti Internet dei partiti nella campagna elettorale 2008.” Comunicazione Politica IX (2): 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. 2012. La politica online: Internet, partiti e cittadini nelle democrazie occidentali. Bologna: il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., T. Poell, and M. de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society. Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., and J.-W. Jang. 2012. “Communication Processes in Participatory Websites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (1): 2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. 1998. “High-Tech Politics. The Impact of Information Communication Technologies.” Convergence 4 (4): 42–58.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. C., and P. N. Howard. 2018. “Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents.” International Journal of Communication 10: 4882–4890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar