Efficient parameter estimation in a macroscopic traffic flow model by discrete mollification

References

• Acosta, C. D., and R. Bürger. 2012. “Difference Schemes Stabilized by Discrete Mollification for Degenerate Parabolic Equations in Two Space Dimensions.” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 32, 1509–1540. doi: 10.1093/imanum/drr049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, C. D., R. Bürger, and C. E. Mejía. 2012. “Monotone Difference Schemes Stabilized by Discrete Mollification for Strongly Degenerate Parabolic Equations.” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 28, 38–62. doi: 10.1002/num.20606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, C. D., R. Bürger, and C. E. Mejía. 2014. “A Stability and Sensitivity Analysis of Parametric Functions in a Sedimentation Model.” DYNA (Colombia) 81, 22–30. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v81n183.36005
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, C. D., and C. E. Mejía. 2008. “Stabilization of Explicit Methods for Convection-Diffusion Problems by Discrete Mollification.” Computers and Mathematics with Applications 55, 363–380. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, R. 1990. “What Does the Entropy Condition Mean in Traffic Flow Theory?” Transportation Research Part B 24, 133–143. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90024-S
   Google Scholar
• Bagnerini, P., R. M. Colombo, and A. Corli. 2006. “On the Role of Source Terms in Continuum Traffic Flow Models.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 44, 917–930. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrone, S., F. De Santi, S. Pieraccini, and M. Marro. 2012. “Coupling Traffic Models on Networks and Urban Dispersion Models for Simulating Sustainable Mobility Strategies.” Computers and Mathematics with Applications 64, 1975–1991. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzoni-Gavage, S., and R. M. Colombo. 2003. “An n-Populations Model for Traffic Flow.” European Journal of Applied Mathematics 14, 587–612. doi: 10.1017/S0956792503005266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., A. Coronel, and M. Sepúlveda. 2006. “A Semi-Implicit Monotone Difference Scheme for an Initial- Boundary Value Problem of a Strongly Degenerate Parabolic Equation Modelling Sedimentation-Consolidation Processes.” Mathematics of Computation 75, 91–112. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01787-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., and K. H. Karlsen. 2001. “On Some Upwind Schemes for the Phenomenological Sedimentation-Consolidation Model.” Journal of Engineering Mathematics 41, 145–166. doi: 10.1023/A:1011935232049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., and K. H. Karlsen. 2003. “On a Diffusively Corrected Kinematic-Wave Traffic Model with Changing Road Surface Conditions.” Mathematial Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 13, 1767–1799. doi: 10.1142/S0218202503003112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., C. Chalons, and L. M. Villada. 2013a. “Anti-Diffusive and Random-Sampling Lagrangian-Remap Schemes for the Multi-Class Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Traffic Model.” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 35, B1341–B1368. doi: 10.1137/130923877
   Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., A. Coronel, and M. Sepúlveda. 2008a. “A Numerical Descent Method for an Inverse Problem of a Scalar Conservation Law Modelling Sedimentation.” In Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications. Proc. of ENUMATH 2007, the 7th Europ. Conf. on Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, Graz, Austria, September 2007, edited by K. Kunisch, G. Of, and O. Steinbach, 225–232. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., A. Coronel, and M. Sepúlveda. 2009. “Numerical Solution of an Inverse Problem for a Scalar Conservation Law Modelling Sedimentation.” In Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics and Applications. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 67, Part 2., edited by E. Tadmor, J.-G. Liu, and A.E. Tzavaras, 445–454. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., A. García, K. H. Karlsen, and J. D. Towers. 2008b. “Difference Schemes, Entropy Solutions, and Speedup Impulse for an Inhomogeneous Kinematic Traffic Flow Model.” Networks and Heterogeneous Media 3, 1–41. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., P. Mulet, and L. M. Villada. 2013b. “A Diffusively Corrected Multiclass Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Traffic Model with Anticipation Lengths and Reaction Times.” Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 5, 728–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürger, R., P. Mulet, and L. M. Villada. 2013c. “Regularized Nonlinear Solvers for IMEX Methods Applied to Diffusively Corrected Multi-Species Kinematic Flow Models.” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 35, B751–B777. doi: 10.1137/120888533
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, B., and G. Gripenberg. 1999. “Continuous Dependence on the Nonlinearities of Solutions of Degenerate Parabolic Equations.” Journal of Differential Equations 151, 231–251. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronel, A., F. James, and M. Sepúlveda. 2003. “Numerical Identification of Parameters for a Model of Sedimentation Processes.” Inverse Problems 19, 951–972. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/19/4/311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, A. C. 1996. “Speed/Flow Relationships within an Urban Area.” Traffic Engineering and Control 8, 393–396.
   Google Scholar
• Engquist, B., and S. Osher. 1981. “One-Sided Difference Approximations for Nonlinear Conservation Laws.” Mathematics of Computation 36, 321–351. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0606500-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evje, S., and K. H. Karlsen. 1999. “Degenerate Convection-Diffusion Equations and Implicit Monotone Difference Schemes.” In Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, Vol. I, edited by M. Fey, and R. Jeltsch, 285–294. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Evje, S., and K. H. Karlsen. 2000. “Monotone Difference Approximations of BV Solutions to Degenerate Convection-Diffusion Equations.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 37, 1838–1860. doi: 10.1137/S0036142998336138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evje, S., K. H. Karlsen, and N. H. Risebro. 2001. “A Continuous Dependence Result for Nonlinear Degenerate Equations with Spatially Dependent Flux Function.” In Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, Vol. I, edited by H. Freistühler and G. Warnecke, 337–346. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, H. 1959. “An Analysis of Traffic Flow.” Operations Research 7, 79–85. doi: 10.1287/opre.7.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., and V. K. Katiyar. 2007. “A New Multi-Class Continuum Model for Traffic Flow.” Transportmetrica 3, 73–85. doi: 10.1080/18128600708685665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, F., and M. Sepúlveda. 1994. “Parameter Identification for a Model of Chromatographic Column.” Inverse Problems 10, 1299–1314. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, F., and M. Sepúlveda. 1999. “Convergence Results for the Flux Identification in a Scalar Conservation Law.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 37, 869–891. doi: 10.1137/S0363012996272722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, W. 2013. “A Multi-Commodity Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Model of Lane-Changing Traffic Flow.” Transportation Research B 57, 361–377. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. T. 1999. “Detection and Remediation of Stagnation in the Nelder-Mead Algorithm Using a Sufficient Decrease Condition.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 10, 43–55. doi: 10.1137/S1052623497315203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagarias, J. C., J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright. 1998. “Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 9, 112–147. doi: 10.1137/S1052623496303470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, L., and S. Moutari. 2007. “Hybridization of a Class of ‘Second Order’ Models of Traffic Flow.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15, 918–934. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Veque, R. J. 2002. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill, M. J., and G. B. Whitham. 1955. “On Kinematic Waves: II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 229, 317–345. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1955.0089
   Google Scholar
• Luersen, M. A., and R. Le Riche. 2004. “Globalized Nelder–Mead Method for Engineering Optimization.” Computers and Structures 82, 2251–2260. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, C. E., C. D. Acosta, and K. I. Saleme. 2011. “Numerical Identification of a Nonlinear Diffusion Coefficient by Discrete Mollification.” Computers and Mathematics with Applications 62, 2187–2199. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murio, D. A. 1993. The Mollification Method and the Numerical Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murio, D. A. 2002. “Mollification and Space Marching.” In Inverse Engineering Handbook, edited by K. Woodbury. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. 2000. “Synchronized Traffic Flow from a Modified Lighthill-Whitham Model.” Physical Review E 61, R6052–R6055. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R6052
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. 2002. “Traveling-Wave Solutions of the Diffusively Corrected Kinematic-Wave Model.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 35, 561–579. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(02)80021-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoduy, D. 2010. “Multiclass First-Order Modelling of Traffic Networks Using Discontinuous Flow-Density Relationships.” Transportmetrica 6, 121–141. doi: 10.1080/18128600902857925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoduy, D. 2011. “Multiclass First-Order Traffic Model Using Stochastic Fundamental Diagrams.” Transportmetrica 7, 111–125. doi: 10.1080/18128600903251334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., I. D. Cooper, and D. Byatt. 2002. “A Convergent Variant of the Nelder-Mead Algorithm.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 113, 5–19. doi: 10.1023/A:1014849028575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, P. I. 1956. “Shock Waves on the Highway.” Operations Research 4, 42–51. doi: 10.1287/opre.4.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouvre, E., and G. Gagneux. 1999. “Solution forte entropique de lois scalaires hyperboliques-paraboliques dégénérées.” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris Série I 329, 599–602.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, C.-W. 1998. “Essentially Non-Oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws.” In Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, edited by B. Cockburn, C. Johnson, C.-W. Shu, E. Tadmor, and A. Quarteroni, 325–432. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, W., S. C. Wong, P. Zhang, and C.-W. Shu. 2011. “A Shock-Fitting Algorithm for the Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Model on Inhomogeneous Highways.” Transportmetrica 7, 163–180. doi: 10.1080/18128600903313936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velan, S., and M. Florian. 2002. “A Note on the Entropy Solutions of the Hydrodynamic Model of Traffic Flow.” Transportation Science 36, 435–446. doi: 10.1287/trsc.36.4.435.548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. C. K., and S. C. Wong. 2002. “A Multi-Class Traffic Flow Model — an Extension of LWR Model with Heterogeneous Drivers.” Transportation Research Part A 36, 827–841.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., C.-W. Shu, G. C. K. Wong, and S. C. Wong. 2003. “A Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Numerical Scheme for a Multi-Class Lighthill-Whitham-Richards Traffic Flow Model.” Journal of Computational Physics 191, 639–659. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00344-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., and R.-X. Liu. 2005. “Generalization of Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method to LWR Traffic Model With Inhomogeneous Road Conditions.” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 21, 80–88. doi: 10.1002/num.20023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q. H., D. Urosevíc, N. Mladenovic, and P. Hansen. 2009. “A Restarted and Modified Simplex Search for Unconstrained Optimization.” Computers & Operations Research 36, 3263–3271. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar