Incorporating within link dynamics in an agent-based computationally faster and scalable queue model

References

• Agarwal, A., and B. Kickhöfer. 2016. “The Correlation of Externalities in Marginal Cost Pricing: Lessons Learned from a Real-world Case Study.” Transportation. doi:doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9753-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., and G. Lämmel. 2015. “Seepage of Smaller Vehicles Under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions.” Procedia Computer Science 52 (C): 890–895. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.147
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., and G. Lämmel. 2016. “Modeling Seepage Behavior of Smaller Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Conditions Using an Agent Based Simulation.” Transportation in Development Economics 2 (2): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., G. Lämmel, and K. Nagel. 2016. “Modelling of Backward Travelling Holes in Mixed Traffic Conditions.” In Traffic and Granular Flow '15, edited by Victor L. Knoop and Winnie Daamen, 1st ed., Chapter 53, 419–426. Delft: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., M. Zilske, K. R. Rao, and K. Nagel. 2013. “Person-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment for Mixed Traffic Conditions.” In Conference on Agent-Based Modeling in Transportation Planning and Operations, Blacksburg, VA. Also VSP WP 12-11, see http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., M. Zilske, K. R. Rao, and K. Nagel. 2015. “An Elegant and Computationally Efficient Approach for Heterogeneous Traffic Modelling using Agent Based Simulation.” Procedia Computer Science 52 (C): 962–967. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.173
   Google Scholar
• Balijepalli, N. C., D. Ngoduy, and D. P. Watling. 2014. “The Two-regime Transmission Model for Network Loading in Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 10 (7): 563–584. doi: 10.1080/18128602.2012.751680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, M., N. Cetin, K. Nagel, and B. Raney. 2004. “Towards Truly Agent-Based Traffic and Mobility Simulations.” In Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'04), New York, NY, July. www.aamas-conference.org.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, M., B. Raney, and K. Nagel. 2005. “Adjustment of Activity Timing and duration in an Agent-Based Traffic Flow Simulation.” In Progress in Activity-Based Analysis, edited by H. J. P. Timmermans, 91–114. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, M., M. Rieser, K. Meister, D. Charypar, N. Lefebvre, K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen. 2009. “MATSim-T: Architecture and Simulation Times.” In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, edited by A. L. C. Bazzan and F. Klügl, 57–78. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., and M. Maciejewski. 2014. “Agent-based Simulation of Electric Taxicab Fleets.” Transportation Research Procedia 4: 191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.015
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., and M. Maciejewski. 2016. “Simulation of City-wide Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin.” Procedia Computer Science 83: 237–244. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050916301442. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121
   Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M.. 2007. “Dynamic Queuing and Spillback in Analytical Multiclass Dynamic Network Loading Model.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2029 (C): 14–21. doi: 10.3141/2029-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin, N., A. Burri, and K. Nagel. 2003. “A Large-Scale Agent-Based Traffic Microsimulation Based On Queue Model.” In Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC), Monte Verita, Switzerland. , http://www.strc.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Charypar, D., K. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. 2007. “Event-Driven Queue-Based Traffic Flow Microsimulation.” Transportation Research Record 2003: 35–40. doi: 10.3141/2003-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F.. 1994. “The Cell Transmission Model: A Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with the Hydrodynamic Theory.” Transportation Research B 28B (4): 269–287. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C. F. 1995. “The Cell Transmission Model, Part II: Network Traffic.” Transportation Research B 29B (2): 79–93. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R
   Google Scholar
• Eissfeldt, N., D. Krajzewicz, K Nagel, and P. Wagner. 2006. “Simulating Traffic Flow with Queues.” http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/publications
   Google Scholar
• Flötteröd, G. 2016. “Queueing Representation of Kinematic Waves.” In The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, edited by A. Horni, K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen, Chapter 50. Ubiquity, London. http://matsim.org/the-book
   Google Scholar
• Frederix, R., F. Viti, and C. M. J. Tampère. 2010. “A density-based dynamic OD estimation method that reproduces within-day congestion dynamics.” In 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 694–699.
   Google Scholar
• Gawron, C. 1998. “An Iterative Algorithm to Determine the Dynamic User Equilibrium in a Traffic Simulation Model.” International Journal of Modern Physics C 9 (3): 393–407. doi: 10.1142/S0129183198000303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., B. Piccoli, and W. Y. Szeto. 2015. “Continuous-time Link-based Kinematic Wave Model: Formulation, Solution Existence, and Well-posedness.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 4 (3): 187–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horni, A., K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen. 2016. The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim. London: Ubiquity. http://matsim.org/the-book
   Google Scholar
• Hurdle, V. F., and B. Son. 2001. Shock Wave and Cumulative Arrival and Departure Models: Partners without Conflict. Annual Meeting Preprint 01-2189. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Kickhöfer, B. 2014. “Economic Policy Appraisal and Heterogeneous Users.” Ph.D. diss., TU Berlin, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Y. Lim, and K. Lim. 2003. “Two Traffic Flow Models for Dynamic Network Loading.” Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill, M. J., and G. B. Whitham. 1955. “On Kinematic Waves. I: Flow Movement in Long Rivers.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 229: 281–345. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1955.0088
   Google Scholar
• Maerivoet, S., and B. De Moor. 2005. “Transportation Planning and Traffic Flow Models.” ArXiv Physics e-prints.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, K. 2008. “Towards Simulation-based Sketch Planning: Some Results Concerning the Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle WA.” VSP Working Paper 08-22. TU Berlin: Transport Systems Planning and Transport Telematics. http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/publications, https://svn.vsp.tu-berlin.de/repos/public-svn/publications/vspwp/2008/08-22.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, K. 2011. “Towards Simulation-based Sketch Planning, Part II: Some Results Concerning a Freeway Extension in Berlin”. VSP Working Paper 11-18. TU Berlin: Transport Systems Planning and Transport Telematics. See http://www.vsp.tu-berlin.de/publications, https://svn.vsp.tu-berlin.de/repos/public-svn/publications/vspwp/2011/11-18.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. F. 1993. “A Simplified Theory of Kinematic Waves in Highway Traffic. I: General Theory. II: Queueing at Freeway Bottlenecks. III: Multi-destination Flows.” Transportation Research B 27B: 281–313. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90038-C
   Google Scholar
• Nie, X., and H. M. Zhang. 2005. “A Comparative Study of Some Macroscopic Link Models used in Dynamic Traffic Assignment.” Networks and Spatial Economics 5 (1): 89–115. doi: 10.1007/s11067-005-6663-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, B., and K. Nagel. 2004. “Iterative Route Planning for Large-Scale Modular Transportation Simulations.” Future Generation Computer Systems 20 (7): 1101–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, B., and K. Nagel. 2006. “An Improved Framework for Large-scale Multi-agent Simulations of Travel Behaviour.” In Towards Better Performing European Transportation Systems, edited by P. Rietveld, B. Jourquin, and K. Westin, 305–347. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raovic, N., O. A. Nielsen, and C. G. Prato. 2017. “Dynamic Queuing Transmission Model for Dynamic Network Loading.” Transport 32 (2): 146–159. doi: 10.3846/16484142.2015.1062417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, P. I.. 1956. “Shock Waves on the Highway.” Operations Research 4 (1): 42–51. doi: 10.1287/opre.4.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, P. M., J. Esser, and K. Nagel. 1999. “Simple Queueing Model Applied to the City of Portland.” International Journal of Modern Physics 10 (5): 941–960. doi: 10.1142/S0129183199000747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, P. M., and K. Nagel. 1999. “Simple Queueing Model Applied to the City of Portland.” Annual Meeting Preprint 99-0861. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, E.-S., M. Bliemer, and B. van Arem. 2011. “Dynamic Network Loading of Multiple User-classes with the Link Transmission Model.” In 2nd International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Sumalee, A., R. X. Zhong, T. L. Pan, and W. Y. Szeto. 2011. “Stochastic Cell Transmission Model (SCTM): A Stochastic Dynamic Traffic Model for Traffic State Surveillance and Assignment.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (3): 507–533. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tordeux, A., M. Roussignol, J.-P. Lebacque, and S. Lassarre. 2014. “A Stochastic Jump Process Applied to Traffic Flow Modelling.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 10 (4): 350–375. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2013.769648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiber, M., and A. Kesting. 2013. Traffic Flow Dynamics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2014. “World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights.” Technical Report ST/ESA/SER.A/352. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
   Google Scholar
• van Wageningen-Kessels, F., H. van Lint, S. Hoogendoorn, and K. Vuik. 2014. “A New Generic Multi-class Kinematic Wave Traffic Flow Model: Model Development and Analysis of its Properties.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2422: 50–60. doi: 10.3141/2422-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan, K., A. Gowri, and R. Sivanandan. 2008. “Development of Microscopic Simulation Model for Heterogeneous Traffic using Object Oriented Approach.” Transportmetrica 4 (3): 227–247. doi: 10.1080/18128600808685689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P. 2017. “Microsimulation Travel Models in Practice in the US and Prospects for Agent-Based Approach.” In Highlights of Practical Applications of Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems: International Workshops of PAAMS 2017, Porto, Portugal, June 21-23, 2017, Proceedings, edited by Javier et al. Bajo, Cham, 52–68. Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60285-1_5.
   Google Scholar
• Yperman, I. 2007. “The Link Transmission Model for Dynamic Network Loading.” Ph.D. diss., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and W. Jin. 2002. “Kinematic Wave Traffic Flow Model for Mixed Traffic.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1802: 197–204. doi: 10.3141/1802-22
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. M., and Y. Nie. 2005. “Modeling Network Flow with and without Link Interaction: Properties and Implication.” Presented at the 84th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. M., Y. (Marco) Nie, and Z. (Sean) Qian. 2013. “Modelling Network Flow With and Without Link Interactions: The Cases of Point Queue, Spatial Queue and Cell Transmission Model.” Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 1 (1): 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., J. Taylor, and F. Pratico. 2014. “DTALite: A Queue-based Mesoscopic Traffic Simulator for Fast Model Evaluation and Calibration.” Cogent Engineering 1 (1): 961345. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2014.961345
   Google Scholar