Covariates-dependent random parameters regret–rejoice models of choice behavior: specification and performance assessment using experimental design data

References

• Abbe, E., M. Bierlaire, and T. Toledo. 2007. “Normalization and Correlation of Cross-Nested Logit Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 41 (7): 795–808. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M., C. G. Chorus, J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. 2013a. “Random Regret and Random Utility in the Household Purchase of a Motor Vehicle.” Proceedings annual TRB meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, M. J., C. G. Chorus, J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. 2013b. “Vehicle Purchasing Behaviour of Individuals and Groups: Regret or Reward?” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 47 (3): 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., C. G. Chorus, and T. Toledo. 2012. “Stochastic User Equilibrium for Route Choice Model Based on Random Regret Minimization.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2284: 100–108. doi: 10.3141/2284-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E. 1982. “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.” Operations Research 30 (5): 961–981. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., and J. Swait. 1986. “The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index.” Transportation Science 20 (2): 133–136. doi: 10.1287/trsc.20.2.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Elia, E., R. Ishaq, and Y. Shiftan. 2013. “If Only I had Taken the Other Road … : Regret, Risk and Reinforced Learning in Informed Route-Choice.” Transportation 40: 269–293. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9426-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. 2008. “The Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model: Role of Utility Function Parameters, Identification Considerations, and Model Extensions.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42: 274–303. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. 2011. “The Maximum Approximate Composite Marginal Likelihood (MACML) Estimation of Multinomial Probit-Based Unordered Response Choice Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45: 923–939. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., S. Astroza, R. Sidharthan, and P. C. Bhat. 2014. “A Multivariate Hurdle Count Data Model with an Endogenous Multiple Discrete–Continuous Selection System.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 63: 77–97. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., S. Astroza, R. Sidharthan, M. J. Bin Alam, and W. H. Khushefati. 2014. “A Joint Count-Continuous Model of Travel Behavior with Selection Based on a Multinomial Probit Residential Density Choice Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 68: 31–51. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., M. Castro, and M. Khan. 2013. “A New Estimation Approach for the Multiple Discrete–Continuous Probit (MDCP) Choice Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 55: 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., and S. K. Dubey. 2014. “A New Estimation Approach to Integrate Latent Psychological Constructs in Choice Modeling.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 67: 68–85. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., and R. Sidharthan. 2012. “A New Approach to Specify and Estimate non-Normally Mixed Multinomial Probit Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46: 817–833. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeri, M., A. Longo, J. M. Grisolia, W. G. Hutchinson, and F. Kee. 2013. “The Role of Regret Minimization in Lifestyle Choices Affecting the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease.” Journal of Health Economics 32 (1): 253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeri, M., and L. Masiero. 2014. “Regret Minimisation and Utility Maximisation in a Freight Transport Context.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 10: 548–560. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2013.809818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, A. W. J., and H. J. P. Timmermans. 1987. “Choice Model Specification, Substitution and Spatial Structure Effects.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 29–47. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(87)90067-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownstone, D., D. Bunch, and K. Train. 2000. “Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34: 315–338. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhara, P. V. S., C. M. Capra, S. Moore, C. Noussair, and G. S. Berns. 2008. “Neurobiological Regret and Rejoice Functions for Aversive Outcomes.” NeuroImage 39: 1472–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoniti, E., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2017. “Context-driven Regret Based Model of Travel Behavior Under Uncertainty: A Latent Class Approach.” Transportation Research Procedia 24: 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.073
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G. 2010. “A New Model of Random Regret Minimization.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 10: 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G. 2014. “A Generalized Random Regret Minimization Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 68: 224–238. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., T. A. Arentze, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2008a. “A Random Regret-Minimization Model of Travel Choice.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42: 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., T. A. Arentze, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2008b. “A Comparison of Regret-Minimization and Utility-maximization in the Context of Travel Mode-choices.” Proceedings 87th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., T. A. Arentze, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2009. “Spatial Choice: A Matter of Utility or Regret?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36 (3): 538–551. doi: 10.1068/b34092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., and M. Bierlaire. 2013. “Travel Choice Models that Generate Preferences for Compromise Alternatives: An Empirical Comparison.” Proceedings 92nd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., and G. C. de Jong. 2011. “Modeling Experienced Accessibility for Utility-Maximizers and Regret-Minimizers.” Journal of Transport Geography 19 (6): 1155–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., S. van Cranenburgh, and T. Dekker. 2014. “Random Regret Minimization for Consumer Choice Modeling: Assessment of Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Business Research 67: 2428–2436. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., M. J. Koetse, and A. Hoen. 2013. “Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Comparing a Utility Maximization and a Regret Minimization Model.” Energy Policy 61: 901–908. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., and J. M. Rose. 2013. “Selecting a Date: A Matter of Regret and Compromises.” In Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice, edited by S. Hess, and A. Daly, 229–242. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Chapter 11.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., J. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. 2013a. “Hybrid Models of Random Utility Maximization and Random Regret Minimization: Results from Two Empirical Studies.” Proceedings annual meeting TRB, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. 2013b. “Regret Minimization or Utility Maximization: It Depends on the Attribute.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 154–169. doi: 10.1068/b38092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A., and M. Bierlaire. 2006. “A General and Operational Representation of Generalised Extreme Value Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (4): 285–305. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bekker-Grob, E. W., and C. G. Chorus. 2013. “Random Regret-Based Discrete Choice Modelling: An Application to Health Care.” PharmacoEconomics 31 (7): 623–634. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0059-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, T., and C. G. Chorus. 2018. “Consumer Surplus for Random Regret Minimisation Models”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (3): 269–286. doi: 10.1080/21606544.2018.1424039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonzone, A., J.-D. Schmocker, J. S. Ma, and D. Fukuda. 2012. “Link Based Route Choice Considering Risk Aversion and Regret.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, Y., M. Okura, and Y. Osaki. 2016. “Regret, Rejoicing and Mixed Insurance.” Economic Modelling 58: 126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., W. H. Greene, and C. G. Chorus. 2013. “Random Regret Minimization or Random Utility Maximization: An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Automobile Fuel Choice.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 47: 667–678. doi: 10.1002/atr.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and A. Stathopoulos. 2013. “A Mixed Random Utility – Random Regret Model Linking the Choice of Decision Rule to Latent Character Traits.” Journal of Choice Modeling 9: 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., A. Stathopoulos, and A. Daly. 2012. “Allowing for Heterogeneous Decision Rules in Discrete Choice Models: An Approach and Four Case Studies.” Transportation 39: 565–591. doi: 10.1007/s11116-011-9365-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2017a. “Incorporating Psycho-Physical Mapping into Random Regret Choice Models: Model Specifications and Empirical Performance Assessments.” Transportation 44: 999–1019. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9691-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2017b. “Bias in Random Regret Models due to Measurement Error: Formal and Empirical Comparison with Random Utility Model.” Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 13: 405–434. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2017.1285366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1984. “Choices, Values and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and C. G. Prato. 2012. “The Application of the Random Regret Minimization Model to Drivers’ Choice of Crash Avoidance Maneuvers.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15 (6): 699–709. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2014a. “Expanding Scope of Hybrid Choice Models Allowing for Mixture of Social Influences and Latent Attitudes: Application to Intended Purchase of Electric Cars.” Transportation Research Part A 69: 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., S. Rasouli, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2014b. “Hybrid Choice Models: Principles and Recent Progress Incorporating Social Influence and Nonlinear Utility Functions.” Procedia Environmental Sciences 22: 20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., O. Netzer, and V. Srinivasan. 2004. “Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect.” Journal of Marketing Research 41: 237–257. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.237.35990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, W., and D. Hensher. 2012. “Embedding Multiple Heuristics into Choice Models: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Choice Modeling 5: 131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, W., and D. Hensher. 2015. “Contrasts of Relative Advantage Maximization with Random Utility Maximization and Regret Minimisation.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 49: 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1982. “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty.” The Economic Journal 92: 805–824. doi: 10.2307/2232669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1987. “Some Implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory.” Journal of Economic Theory 41: 270–287. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(87)90020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., and A. Papola. 2008. “On the Covariance Structure of the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42 (2): 83–98. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, V., A. Papola, F. Simonelli, and R. Vitillo. 2013. “A Practically Tractable Expression of the Covariances of the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Transportation 57: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson, L.-G., J. G. Weibull, and P. O. Lindberg. 2014. “Extreme Values, Invariance and Choice Probabilities.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 59: 81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice-Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. J., and T. C. Eagle. 1982. “Context-Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate-Stochastic Model of Store Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 19: 62–71. doi: 10.2307/3151531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. P. 2008. “Normalization of Network Generalized Extreme Value Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 42 (10): 958–969. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedercorn, J. H., and B. V. Bechdolt. 1969. “An Economic Derivation of the “Gravity Law” of Spatial Interaction.” Journal of Regional Science 9: 273–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1969.tb01340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P. 1975. “Reflections on Gravity and Entropy Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 5: 203–225. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(75)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe, A. 1976. “A Theoretical Comparison of the Opportunity and Gravity Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6: 381–397. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(76)90032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papola, A. 2004. “Some Developments on the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38 (11): 833–851. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2003.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Pinjari, A. R. 2011. “Generalized Extreme Value (GEV)-Based Error Structures for Multiple Discrete–Continuous Choice Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (2): 474–489. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Pinjari, A. R., and C. R. Bhat. 2010. “A Multiple Discrete–Continuous Nested Extreme Value (MDCNEV) Model: Formulation and Application to Non-Worker Activity Time-use and Timing Behavior on Weekdays.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44: 562–583. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prato, C. P. 2014. “Expanding the Applicability of Random Regret Minimization for Route Choice Analysis.” Transportation 41: 351–375. doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9489-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiggin, J. 1982. “A Theory of Anticipated Utility.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–343. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiggin, J. 1994. “Regret Theory with General Choice Sets.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8 (2): 153–65. doi: 10.1007/BF01065370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, G., W. Daamen, and S. P. Hoogendoorn. 2011. “Comparative Analysis on Purpose of Expected Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Predict Route Choice Behavior.” Proceedings TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2014. “Regret-based Models of Consumer Choice of Shopping Center.” In Proceedings 21th RARCS conference, Bucharest, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds. 2015. Bounded Rational Choice Behaviour: Applications in Transport. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2017. “Specification of Regret-Based Models of Choice Behaviour: Formal Analyses and Experimental Design Based Evidence.” Transportation 44: 1555–1576. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9714-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2018. “Issues in the Specification of Regret-Only Choice Models: A Rejoinder to Chorus and Van Cranenburgh.” Transportation 45: 257–263. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9740-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, G. 1969. “Analysis of Spatial Behavior by Revealed Space Preference.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 59: 391–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1969.tb00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E. 1975a. “An Axiomatic Theory of Spatial Discounting Behavior.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 35: 31–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01947466
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E. 1975b. “A Choice Theory of Spatial Interaction.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 5: 137–176. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(75)90002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E. 1976. “Spatial Discounting and the Gravity Hypothesis.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6: 331–356. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(76)90030-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theine, M., M. Boeri, and C. G. Chorus. 2012. “Random Regret Minimization: Exploration of a new Choice Model for Environmental and Resource Economics.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51 (3): 413–429. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9505-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H. J. P., and G. Rushton. 1979. “Revealed Space Preference Theory: A Rejoinder.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 70: 309–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.1979.tb01890.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tom, S. M., C. R. Fox, C. Trepel, and R. A. Poldrack. 2007. “The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk.” Science 315: 515–518. doi: 10.1126/science.1134239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and I. Simonson. 1993. “Context-dependent Preferences.” Management Science 39 (10): 1179–1189. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–1061. doi: 10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cranenburgh, S., C. S. Guevara, and C. G. Chorus. 2015. “New Insights on Random Regret Minimization Models.” Transportation Research Part A 74: 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., and M. Ben-Akiva. 2002. “Generalized Random Utility Model.” Mathematical Social Sciences 43: 303–343. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedell, D. H., and U. Bockenholt. 1994. “Contemplating Single Versus Multiple Encounters of a Risky Prospect.” The American Journal of Psychology 107: 499–518. doi: 10.2307/1422997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C. H., and F. S. Koppelman. 2001. “The Generalized Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 (11): 627–641. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00045-X
   Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., J. Beattie, J. van der Pligt, and N. K. de Vries. 1996. “Consequences of Regret Aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65 (2): 148–158. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., W. W. van Dijk, A. S. R. Manstead, and J. van der Pligt. 2000. “On Bad Decisions and Disconfirmed Expectancies: The Psychology of Regret and Disappointment.” Cognition and Emotion 14 (4): 521–541. doi: 10.1080/026999300402781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., H. J. P. Timmermans, A. W. J. Borgers, and D. Wang. 2004. “Modeling Traveler Choice Behavior Using the Concepts of Relative Utility and Relative Interest.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38: 215–234. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar