Natural waste: canine companions and the lure of inattentively pooping in public

References

• Archer, M. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arhant, C., and J. Troxler. 2009. “Dog Litter in an Urban Environment: Factors Associated with Owners’ Decision not to Pick Up their Dogs’ Droppings.” Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 4 (2): 62. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., and P. Wehling. 2012. “The Politics of Non-Knowing: An Emerging Area of Social and Political Conflict in Reflexive Modernity.” In The Politics of Knowledge, edited by F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, 33–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, A. 2012. “Entscheiden Trotz Nichtwissen: Das Beispiel Der Sanierung Kontaminierter Flächen.” Soziale Welt 63 (2): 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A., and T. E. Jensen. 2011. Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, K.-W. 2010. “Social Practices and Sustainable Consumption: Benefits and Limitations of a New Theoretical Approach.” In Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges, edited by M. Gross and H. Heinrichs, 217–235. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brandow, M. 2008. New York’s Poop Scoop Law: Dogs, the Dirt, and Due Process. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browdie, B. 2012. “America’s Dogs Poop 10 Million Tons a Year, a Potential Health Hazard, Waste Firm Finds.” New York Daily News, April 21. http://www.nydailynews.com
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M. 1982. “When is Disguise Justified? Alternatives to Covert Participant Observation.” Qualitative Sociology 5 (4): 251–264. doi:10.1007/BF00986753.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, T. 2012. “Bags of Dog Poo Left Hanging on Trees.” Kent Online, February 3. http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/home/2012/february/3/dog_poo.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. 2010. Towards Relational Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derr, M. 2004 [1997]. Dog‘s Best Friend: Annals of the Dog-Human Relationship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, W. J. 2008. “Dogs: A Continuing and Common Neighborhood Nuisance of New Providence, the Bahamas.” Society and Animals 16 (1): 61–73. doi:10.1163/156853008X269890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. 1999. Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2005. “Co-Evolution of Technology and Society: The Transition in Water Supply and Personal Hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) – A Case Study in Multi-Level Perspective.” Technology in Society 27 (3): 363–397. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2010. Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2012. “‘Objective Culture’ and the Development of Nonknowledge: Georg Simmel and the Reverse Side of Knowing.” Cultural Sociology 6 (4): 422–437. doi:10.1177/1749975512445431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, T. 2013. “Trans-Species Urban Politics: Stories from a Beach.” Space and Culture 16 (1): 28–42. doi:10.1177/1206331212452365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, D. 2001. A Sociological History of Excretory Experience: Defecatory Manners and Toiletry Technologies. Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. 2012. “Situated Activities in a Dog Park: Identity and Conflict in Human-Animal Space.” Society and Animals 20 (3): 254–272. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A., A. M. Beck, and S. McCune, eds. 2011. The Health Benefits of Dog Walking for People and Pets: Evidence and Case Studies. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauri, V. 2012. “Poop, Scoop and Hang: The Doo-Doos and Don’ts of Dealing with your Dog’s Droppings.” National Post, May 12. http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/05/12/poop-scoop-and-hang-the-doo-doos-and-donts-of-dealing-with-your-dogs-droppings/.
   Google Scholar
• Kneist, S. 2011. “Dauerärgernis Hundekot: Haufenweise gute Tipps.” Der Tagesspiegel, June 7. http://www.tagesspiegel.de.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. 2003. “Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool.” Ethnography 4 (3): 455–485. doi:10.1177/146613810343007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2012. “Collateral Realities.” In The Politics of Knowledge, edited by F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, 156–178. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. 2001. “Barking Mad? Risk Regulation and the Control of Dangerous Dogs in Germany.” German Politics 10 (3): 65–82. doi:10.1080/714001159.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. 2012. “The Logic of Strategic Ignorance.” The British Journal of Sociology 63 (3): 533–576. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01424.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menache, S. 1997. “Dogs: God’s Worst Enemies?” Society and Animals 5 (1): 23–44. doi:10.1163/156853097X00204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2000. Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., and L. Norén, eds. 2010. Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norén, L. 2010. “Only Dogs are Free to Pee: New York Cabbies’ Search for Civility.” In Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing, edited by H. Molotch and L. Norén, 93–114. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. Chicago, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passoth, J.-H., B. Peuker, and M. Schillmeier, eds. 2012. Agency Without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C., and F. Dépelteau 2013. Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Power, E. 2008. “Furry Families: Making a Human-Dog Family through Home.” Social & Cultural Geography 9 (5): 535–555. doi:10.1080/14649360802217790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2013. “Organizational Ignorance: Towards a Managerial Perspective on the Unknown.” Management Learning 44 (3): 215–236. doi:10.1177/1350507612443208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. 1999. Understanding Dogs: Living and Working With Canine Companions. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayes, E. 2014. “Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does it Mean to Say that Nonhumans Have Agency?” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. doi:10.1177/0306312713511867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2010. “Materiality and Social Life.” Nature and Culture 5 (2): 123–149. doi:10.3167/nc.2010.050202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Organization of Normality. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smithers, R. 2012. “UK Beaches Blighted by Balloons and Discarded Bags of Dog Poo.” The Guardian, March 22.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. 2011. “Theories of Practices: Agency, Technology, and Culture – Exploring the Relevance of Practice Theories for the Governance of Sustainable Consumption Practices in the New World-Order.” Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 813–822. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. 2001. Bathing: The Body and Community Care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vitek, B., and W. Jackson, eds. 2008. The Virtues of Ignorance: Complexity, Sustainability, and the Limits of Knowledge. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, M., and B. Peukert, eds. 2006. Verschwindet Die Natur? Die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie in der umweltsoziologischen Diskussion. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, P., and C. Siviter. 2000. “Why Do Some Owners Allow Their Dogs to Foul the Pavement? The Social Psychology of a Minor Rule Infraction.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 (7): 1371–1380. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02525.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, D. L. 2006. “Factors Influencing Owners’ Reactions to Their Dogs’ Fouling.” Environment and Behavior 38 (5): 707–714. doi:10.1177/0013916505284794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H. L. 2012. “A Socio-Cultural Analysis of Changing Household Electricity Consumption in India.” In Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems: The Contributions of Social Science, edited by D. Spreng, T. Flüeler, D. L. Goldblatt, and J. Minsch, 97–115. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, L. 2000 [1960]. Clean and Decent: The Fascinating History of the Bathroom and the Water-Closet. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar