176
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Understanding public perceptions of wood-based electricity production in Wisconsin, United States: the place-based dynamics of social representations

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 381-393 | Received 11 May 2016, Accepted 12 Dec 2016, Published online: 23 Jan 2017

References

  • Andreouli, E., and C. Howarth. 2013. “National Identity, Citizenship and Immigration: Putting Identity in Context.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (3): 361–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00501.x.
  • Assefa, G., and B. Frostell. 2007. “Social Sustainability and Social Acceptance in Technology Assessment: A Case Study of Energy Technologies.” Technology in Society 29 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007.
  • Barbose, G., L. Bird, J. Heeter, F. Flores-Espino, and R. Wiser. 2015. “Costs and Benefits of Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52: 523–533. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.175.
  • Barry, J., G. Ellis, and C. Robinson. 2008. “Cool Rationalities and Hot Air: A Rhetorical Approach to Understanding Debates on Renewable Energy.” Global Environmental Politics 8 (2): 67–98. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.67.
  • Batel, S., and P. Castro. 2009. “A Social Representations Approach to the Communication between Different Spheres: An Analysis of the Impacts of Two Discursive Formats.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (4): 415–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00412.x.
  • Batel, S., and P. Devine-Wright. 2015. “Towards a Better Understanding of People’s Responses to Renewable Energy Technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1177/0963662513514165.
  • Batel, S., P. Devine-Wright, and T. Tangeland. 2013. “Social Acceptance of Low Carbon Energy and Associated Infrastructures: A Critical Discussion.” Energy Policy 58: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018.
  • Becker, D. R., K. Skog, A. Hellman, K. E. Halvorsen, and T. Mace. 2009. “An Outlook for Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Production in the Lake States.” Energy Policy 37: 5687–5693. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.033.
  • Bell, D., T. Gray, and C. Haggett. 2005. “The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses.” Environmental Politics 14 (4): 460–477. doi:10.1080/09644010500175833.
  • Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods & Research 10 (2): 141–163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205.
  • Bridge, G., S. Bouzarovski, M. Bradshaw, and N. Eyre. 2013. “Geographies of Energy Transition: Space, Place and the Low-Carbon Economy.” Energy Policy 53: 331–340. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.
  • Burningham, K. 2000. “Using the Language of NIMBY: A Topic for Research, Not an Activity for Researchers.” Local Environment 5 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1080/135498300113264.
  • Castro, P., and S. Batel. 2008. “Social Representation, Change and Resistance: On the Difficulties of Generalizing New Norms.” Culture & Psychology 14 (4): 475–497. doi:10.1177/1354067X08096512.
  • Castro, P., and C. Mouro. 2011. “Psycho‐Social Processes in Dealing with Legal Innovation in the Community: Insights from Biodiversity Conservation.” American Journal of Community Psychology 47 (3–4): 362–373. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9391-0.
  • Census Bureau, U. S. 2010. “Ashland County in American Factfinder.” http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
  • Cross, J. E. 2015. “Processes of Place Attachment: An Interactional Framework.” Symbolic Interaction 38 (4): 493–520. doi:10.1002/symb.198.
  • Dear, M. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (3): 288–300. doi:10.1080/01944369208975808.
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2011. “Place Attachment and Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Tidal Energy Case Study.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (4): 336–343. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.001.
  • Devine‐Wright, P. 2005. “Beyond Nimbyism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy.” Wind Energy 8 (2): 125–139. doi:10.1002/we.124.
  • Devine‐Wright, P. 2009. “Rethinking Nimbyism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place‐Protective Action.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6): 426–441. doi:10.1002/casp.1004.
  • Devine-Wright, P., and Y. Howes. 2010. “Disruption to Place Attachment and the Protection of Restorative Environments: A Wind Energy Case Study.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (3): 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008.
  • Dincer, I. 2000. “Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development: A Crucial Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 4 (2): 157–175. doi:10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8.
  • Ebers, A., R. W. Malmsheimer, T. A. Volk, and D. H. Newman. 2016. “Inventory and Classification of United States Federal and State Forest Biomass Electricity and Heat Policies.” Biomass and Bioenergy 84: 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.024.
  • Ellis, G., J. Barry, and C. Robinson. 2007. “Many Ways to Say ‘No’, Different Ways to Say ‘Yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4): 517–551. doi:10.1080/09640560701402075.
  • Evans, B., J. Parks, and K. Theobald. 2011. “Urban Wind Power and the Private Sector: Community Benefits, Social Acceptance and Public Engagement.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (2): 227–244. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.505829.
  • Gieryn, T. F. 2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 463–496. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463.
  • Gross, C. 2007. “Community Perspectives of Wind Energy in Australia: The Application of a Justice and Community Fairness Framework to Increase Social Acceptance.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2727–2736. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
  • Halfacree, K. H. 1994. “The Importance of ‘The Rural’in the Constitution of Counterurbanization: Evidence from England in the 1980s.” Sociologia Ruralis 34 (2–3): 164–189. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1994.tb00807.x.
  • Hands, D. E., and R. D. Brown. 2002. “Enhancing Visual Preference of Ecological Rehabilitation Sites.” Landscape and Urban Planning 58 (1): 57–70. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00240-7.
  • Hindmarsh, R., and C. Matthews. 2008. “Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 10 (3): 217–232. doi:10.1080/15239080802242662.
  • Hoggart, K., and H. Buller. 1995. “Retired British Home Owners in Rural France.” Ageing and Society 15 (3): 325–353. doi:10.1017/S0144686X00002580.
  • Jobert, A., P. Laborgne, and S. Mimler. 2007. “Local Acceptance of Wind Energy: Factors of Success Identified in French and German Case Studies.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2751–2760. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005.
  • Jovchelovitch, S. 1996. “In Defence of Representations.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (2): 121–135. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00525.x.
  • Jovchelovitch, S. 2007. Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Jovchelovitch, S., and M.-C. Gervais. 1999. “Social Representations of Health and Illness: The Case of the Chinese Community in England.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 9 (4): 247–260. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199907/08)9:4<247::AID-CASP500>3.0.CO;2-E.
  • Kivimäki, M., and R. Kalimo. 1993. “Risk Perception among Nuclear Power Plant Personnel: A Survey.” Risk Analysis 13 (4): 421–424. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00742.x.
  • Lauri, M. A. 2009. “Metaphors of Organ Donation, Social Representations of the Body and the Opt‐Out System.” British Journal of Health Psychology 14 (4): 647–666. doi:10.1348/135910708X397160.
  • Leucht, M., T. Kölbel, P. Laborgne, and N. Khomenko. 2010. “The Role of Societal Acceptance in Renewable Energy Innovations Breakthrough in the Case of Deep Geothermal Technology.” In Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. Bali, Indonesia.
  • Moloney, G., and I. Walker. 2002. “Talking about Transplants: Social Representations and the Dialectical, Dilemmatic Nature of Organ Donation and Transplantation.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41 (2): 299–320. doi:10.1348/014466602760060264.
  • Monroe, M. C., and A. Oxarart. 2011. “Woody Biomass Outreach in the Southern United States: A Case Study.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35 (4): 1465–1473. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.064.
  • Moscovici, S. 1988. “Notes Towards a Description of Social Representations.” European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (3): 211–250. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180303.
  • Moscovici, S. 2000. Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology, edited by G. Duveen. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Owens, S., and L. Driffill. 2008. “How to Change Attitudes and Behaviours in the Context of Energy.” Energy Policy 36 (12): 4412–4418. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031.
  • Pachauri, R. K., M. R. Allen, V. R. Barros, J. Broome, W. Cramer, R. Christ, J. A. Church et al. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.151.
  • Pedersen, E., and K. P. Waye. 2004. “Perception and Annoyance Due to Wind Turbine Noise—A Dose–Response Relationship.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (6): 3460–3470. doi:10.1121/1.1815091.
  • Perlack, R., L. Wright, A. Turhollow, R. Graham, B. Stokes, and D. Erbach. 2005. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply. Oak Ridge, TN: Oakridge National Laboratory.
  • Pidgeon, N., and C. C. Demski. 2012. “From Nuclear to Renewable: Energy System Transformation and Public Attitudes.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (4): 41–51. doi:10.1177/0096340212451592.
  • Pinch, T., and W. Bijker. 1987. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Poumadère, M., R. Bertoldo, and J. Samadi. 2011. “Public Perceptions and Governance of Controversial Technologies to Tackle Climate Change: Nuclear Power, Carbon Capture and Storage, Wind, and Geoengineering.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 (5): 712–727. doi:10.1002/wcc.134.
  • Real, E., C. Arce, and J. Manuel Sabucedo. 2000. “Classification of Landscapes Using Quantitative and Categorical Data, and Prediction of Their Scenic Beauty in North-Western Spain.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20 (4): 355–373. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0184.
  • REN21. 2015. Renewables 2015 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat.
  • Roni, M. S., S. D. Eksioglu, E. Searcy, and K. Jha. 2014. “A Supply Chain Network Design Model for Biomass Co-Firing in Coal-Fired Power Plants.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 61: 115–134. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.007.
  • Sathre, R., and J. O’Connor. 2010. “Meta-Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Displacement Factors of Wood Product Substitution.” Environmental Science & Policy 13 (2): 104–114. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005.
  • Schelly, C. 2014. “Implementing Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in a Two-State Comparison.” Energy Policy 67: 543–551. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.075.
  • Tongco, M. D. 2007. “Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection.“ Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5: 147–158. doi:10.17348/era.5.0.147-158.
  • Tonnies, F., and C. P. Loomis. 1957. Community and Society. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc.
  • Upham, P., and S. Shackley. 2006. “The Case of a Proposed 21.5 Mwe Biomass Gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for Governance of Renewable Energy Planning.” Energy Policy 34 (15): 2161–2172. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.001.
  • Van Der Horst, D. 2007. “NIMBY or Not? Exploring the Relevance of Location and the Politics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2705–2714. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
  • Wagner, W., F. Elejabarrieta, and I. Lahnsteiner. 1995. “How the Sperm Dominates the Ovum—Objectification by Metaphor in the Social Representation of Conception.” European Journal of Social Psychology 25 (6): 671–688. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250606.
  • Wagner, W., N. Kronberger, and F. Seifert. 2002. “Collective Symbolic Coping with New Technology: Knowledge, Images and Public Discourse.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41 (3): 323–343. doi:10.1348/014466602760344241.
  • Warren, C. R., C. Lumsden, S. O’Dowd, and R. V. Birnie. 2005. “‘Green on Green’: Public Perceptions of Wind Power in Scotland and Ireland.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48 (6): 853–875. doi:10.1080/09640560500294376.
  • Wiser, R., G. Barbose, J. Heeter, T. Mai, L. Bird, M. Bolinger, A. Carpenter, et al. 2016. A Retrospective Analysis of the Benefits and Impacts of US Renewable Portfolio Standards. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65005.pdf
  • Wolsink, M. 2000. “Wind Power and the NIMBY-Myth: Institutional Capacity and the Limited Significance of Public Support.” Renewable Energy 21 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5.
  • Wolsink, M. 2006. “Invalid Theory Impedes Our Understanding: A Critique on the Persistence of the Language of NIMBY.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (1): 85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x.
  • Wolsink, M. 2007. “Planning of Renewables Schemes: Deliberative and Fair Decision-Making on Landscape Issues Instead of Reproachful Accusations of Non-Cooperation.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2692–2704. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002.
  • Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, and M. J. Bürer. 2007. “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2683–2691. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.