Improving regional waste management using the circular economy as an epistemic object

References

• Abson, D. J., H. von Wehrden, S. Baumgärtner, J. Fischer, J. Hanspach, W. Härdtle, H. Heinrichs, et al. 2014. “Ecosystem Services as a Boundary Object for Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 103: 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, N., M. Elmquist, and F. Norrgren. 2009. “The Challenge of Managing Boundary-Spanning Research Activities: Experiences from the Swedish Context.” Research Policy 38: 1136–1149. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. 2001. “University-To-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions.” International Journal of Management Reviews 3: 285–302. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2001.3.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. S. 2007. “An Introductory Note on the Environmental Economics of the Circular Economy.” Sustainability Science 2: 133–140. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., R. Putnam, and D. M. Smith. 1985. Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Avfall Sverige. 2015. Kommunernas roller i den cirkulära ekonomin. Malmö: Avfall Sverige. Accessed October 13 2016. http://www.mynewsdesk.com/material/document/50779/download?resource_type=resource_document13.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, R. U., and L. Ayres. 2002. A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, W. C., P. M. Leonardi, and D. E. Bailey. 2012. “Engineering Objects for Collaboration: Strategies of Ambiguity and Clarity at Knowledge Boundaries.” Human Communication Research 38: 280–308. doi:10.1111/hcre.2012.38.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. 2003. “Sharing Meaning across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor.” Organization Science 14: 312–330. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergbäck, B., A.-C. Bayard, and L. Sörme. 2015. Avfall i Småland-en resursgruva. Accessed April 27 2017. http://www.http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:912727/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H. 2001. “Learning with the Natural Step: Action Research to Promote Conversations for Sustainable Development.” In The Handbook of Action Research, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 236–242. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, F. S., and K. Jax. 2007. “Focusing the Meaning(S) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object.” Ecology and Society 12: 16. doi:10.5751/ES-02029-120123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13: 442–455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15: 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8086–8091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K. 1997. “Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies.” Theory, Culture & Society 14: 1–30. doi:10.1177/026327697014004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2011. “The Persistence of Epistemic Objects through Scientific Change.” Erkenntnis 75: 413–429. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9340-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman Philips, M., and T. Huzzard. 2007. “Developmental Magic? Two Takes on a Dialogue Conference.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 20: 8–25. doi:10.1108/09534810710715252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen Macarthur Foundation. 2012. “Towards the Circular Economy.” Accessed September 13 2016. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., and J. Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as ‘Epistemic Objects’.” Organization Studies 30: 7–30. doi:10.1177/0170840608083014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FUSION. 2014. “What Do Europe’s Small and Medium Sized Businesses Think about the Circular Economy? Fusion Observatory.” Accessed September 13 2016. http://www.ecoconnect.org.uk/publications/what-do-europes-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-think-about-the-circular-economy/.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., and B. Doberstein. 2008. “Developing the Circular Economy in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Achieving ‘Leapfrog Development’.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 15: 231–239. doi:10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., Q. Zhu, B. Doberstein, and T. Fujita. 2009. “Implementing China’s Circular Economy Concept at the Regional Level: A Review of Progress in Dalian, China.” Waste Management 29: 996–1002. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati. 2016. “A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to A Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems.” Journal of Cleaner Production 114: 11–32. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graedel, T. E. 1996. “On the Concept of Industrial Ecology.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 21: 69–98. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.69.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., and M. Levin. 2007. Introduction to Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., and N. Chrisman. 1998. “Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology.” Environment and Planning A 30: 1683–1694. doi:10.1068/a301683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, L. 2015. “Biogas as a Boundary Object for Policy Integration – The Case of Stockholm.” Journal of Cleaner Production 98: 185–193. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. 2015. “Closing the Loop or Squaring the Circle? Locating Generative Spaces for the Circular Economy.” Progress in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0309132514566342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M. 2013. “Sustainability Indicator Systems within Urban Governance: Usability Analysis of Sustainability Indicator Systems as Boundary Objects.” Ecological Indicators 32: 89–96. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. 2003. “Theorizing Collaboration Practice.” Public Management Review 5: 401–423. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964.
   Google Scholar
• Huzzard, T., B. M. Ahlberg, and M. Ekman. 2010. “Constructing Interorganizational Collaboration: The Action Researcher as Boundary Subject.” Action Research 8: 293–314. doi:10.1177/1476750309335206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N., and E. Vaaste. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Information Systems’ Implementation Use.” MIS Quarterly 29: 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, A. 2011. “Epistemic Objects as Interactive Loci.” Axiomathes 21: 57–66. doi:10.1007/s10516-010-9132-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieder, M., and A. Rashid. 2016. “Towards Circular Economy Implementation: A Comprehensive Review in Context of Manufacturing Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 115: 36–51. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, A. B., M. Braungart, W. R. Stahel, J. Birkeland, S. Goerner, D. Spicer, C. Tuppen, et al. 2013. A New Dynamic Effective Business in a Circular Economy. Ellen Cowes: MacArthur Foundation Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A., and H. Tan. 2011. “Progress toward a Circular Economy in China.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 15: 435–457. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., L. Neij, O. Mont, C. Ryan, H. Rodhe, and R. Orsato. 2016. “Advancing Sustainable Solutions: An Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Research Agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. 2010. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and J. Virkkunen. 2005. “Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change.” Organization 12: 437–456. doi:10.1177/1350508405051279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A., K. Skene, and K. Haynes. 2017. “The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context.” Journal of Business Ethics 140: 369-380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, J. P., and J. J. Cousins. 2015. “The Boundaries of Urban Metabolism: Towards a Political-Industrial Ecology.” Progress in Human Geography 39: 702–728. doi:10.1177/0309132514558442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., J. Mengis, and J. Swan. 2012. “Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration.” Organization Science 23: 612–629. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, F. 2012. “A Global Redesign? Shaping the Circular Economy.” Energy, Environment and Resource Governance. Accessed October 13 2016. https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/182376.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury, eds. 2006. The Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, F., and A. Wallo. 2013. “The Interactive Researcher as a Virtual Participant: A Habermasian Interpretation.” Action Research 11: 194–212. doi:10.1177/1476750313484503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvé, S., S. Bernard, and P. Sloan. 2016. “Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Development and Circular Economy: Alternative Concepts for Trans-Disciplinary Research.” Environmental Development 17: 48–56. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, U. G. 2013. “New Business Models for a Radical Change in Resource Efficiency.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 9: 43–47. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., and B. Gustavsen. 1999. The Role of “Dialogue Conferences” in the Development of “Learning Regions”: Doing “From Within” Our Lives Together What We Cannot Do Apart. Stockholm: Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35: 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., P. J. Crutzen, and J. R. McNeill. 2007. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature.” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36: 614–621. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, et al. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347: 1259855. doi:10.1126/science.1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, L., P.-E. Ellström, and G. Brulin. 2007. “Introduction – On Interactive Research.” International Journal of Action Research 3: 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Boundary Objects: The Case of Ecological Indicators.” Science and Public Policy 36: 403–412. doi:10.3152/030234209X442007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wijk, R., J. J. Jansen, and M. A. Lyles. 2008. “Inter‐ and Intra‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Management Studies 45: 830–853. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, B. 2015. “Toward Social Material Flow Analysis: On the Usefulness of Boundary Objects in Urban Mining Research.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 19: 742–752. doi:10.1111/jiec.12361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westblom, C. 2015. “Towards a Circular Economy in Sweden-Barriers for New Business Models and the Need for Policy Intervention.” IIIEE master thesis. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, P. G., and P. Reason. 2009. “Initiating Action Research: Challenges and Paradoxes of Opening Communicative Space.” Action Research 7: 243–262. doi:10.1177/1476750309336715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., N. Schäpke, F. van Steenbergen, and I. Omann. 2014. “Making Sense of Sustainability Transitions Locally: How Action Research Contributes to Addressing Societal Challenges.” Critical Policy Studies 8: 465–485. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.957336.
   Google Scholar
• Zhijun, F., and Y. Nailing. 2007. “Putting a Circular Economy into Practice in China.” Sustainability Science 2: 95–101. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0018-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar