Porousness and Peru’s moratorium on genetically modified organisms: stakeholder epistemologies and neoliberal science

References

• Avilés, W., and Y. R. Rosas. 2017. “Low-Intensity Democracy and Peru’s Neoliberal State: The Case of the Humala Administration.” Latin American Perspectives 44 (5): 162–182. doi:10.1177/0094582X17705867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, C., and E. G. Nolte 2015. “Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Report.” Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. (translated by M. Ritter). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Branford, S. 2013. “Peru: A 10-year Ban on GMOs.” Latin America Bureau, June 13. https://lab.org.uk/peru-a-10-year-ban-on-gmos/
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–32. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, C. 2017. “Neoliberalism as an Object of Political Analysis: An Ideology, a Mode of Regulation or a Governmentality?” Policy & Politics 45 (3): 343–360. doi:10.1332/030557316X14800750043260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso, G. 2013. “Justice, Equality and Conviviality: The World Social Forum’s Cosmopolitan Vision.” Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 5 (2): 78–97.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, S. 2017. “Dos De Cada 100 Denunciados Por Corrupción Van a Prisión [Two Out of Every 100 Reported for Corruption Go to prison].” Radio Programas del Peru, August 8. http://rpp.pe/politica/estado/dos-de-cada-100-denunciados-por-corrupcion-van-a-prision-noticia-1068877
   Google Scholar
• Center for Food Safety. 2000. “The Hidden Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Food.” Food Safety Review. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/campaign/genetically-engineered-food/crops/other-resources
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. 2016. The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Delborne, J. A. 2011. “Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy.” Social Epistemology 25 (1): 67–95. doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.534565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, G. M. 2014. “As Corruption Runs Riots, Peru Unleashes Secret Police to Infiltrate.” Panam Post, June 8. https://panampost.com/marcela-estrada/2014/05/27/as-corruption-runs-riot-peru-unleashes-secret-police-to-infiltrate/?cn-reloaded=1
   Google Scholar
• Dona, A., and I. Arvanitoyannis. 2009. “Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 49 (2): 91–124. doi:10.1080/10408390701855993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. L. 2015. “By the Gun or by the Bribe: Firm Size, Environmental Governance and Corruption among Mining Companies in Guatemala.” U4 Issue Paper 2015:17, Chr. Bergen, Norway: Michelsen Institute. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. L., and T. D. Olsen. 2014. ““They Have Good devices”: Trust, Mining, and the Microsociology of Environmental Decision-Making.” Journal of Cleaner Production 84: 183–192. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, K. 2015. “Disciplining Regions: Subnational Contention in Neoliberal Peru.” Territory, Politics, Governance 3 (2): 124–146. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1005126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewen, S. W., and A. Pusztai. 1999. “Effects of Diets Containing Genetically Modified Potatoes Expressing Galanthus Nivalis Lectin in Rat Intestine.” Lancet 354 (9187): 1353–1354. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05860-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, J. M., and D. M. Turner. 2011. “Introduction.” In Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies, edited by M. J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, and M. D. Turner, 1–23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. A. 2015. “Slowing the Nanotechnology Treadmill: Impact Science versus Production Science for Sustainable Technological Development.” Environmental Sociology 1 (3): 143–151. doi:10.1080/23251042.2015.1041211.
   Google Scholar
• Graddy, T. G. 2013. “Regarding Biocultural Heritage: In Situ Political Ecology of Agricultural Biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes.” Agriculture and Human Values 30 (4): 587–604. doi:10.1007/s10460-013-9428-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Rosatti, A. 2009. “Informe: Monitoreo De Transgenes En Cosechas Nacionales De Maiz Amarillo Duro- Año 2008 [Report: Monitoring of Transgenes in National Crop of Hard Yellow Corn - Year 2008].” http://pe.biosafetyclearinghouse.net/actividades/2009/reporte2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society; Student Protest, Science, and Politics. (Translated by J.J. Shapiro). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Originally published 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. R. 2002. “Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in guatemala.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34 (03): 485–524. doi:10.1017/S0022216X02006521.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. 2007. “Multi-Sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS.” Science, Technology & Human Values 32 (6): 652–671. doi:10.1177/0162243907303598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA). 2010. Verificación De La Presencia De Cultivos De Maíz Transgénico En El Valle De Barranca [Verification of the Presence of Transgenic Corn Crops in the Valley of barranca]. Lima, Peru: Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, S. 2013. “Qualitative Secondary Data Analysis: Ethics, Epistemology and Context.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 295–306. doi:10.1177/1464993413490479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A. 2012. Seeds, Science, and Struggle. The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A., D. L. Kleinman, and R. Autry. 2008. “Against Free Markets, against Science? Regulating the Socio-Economic Effects of Biotechnology.” Rural Sociology 73 (2): 147–179. doi:10.1526/003601108784514570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, R., P. Mirowski, and S. Randalls. 2010. Introduction: STS and Neoliberal Science. Social Studies of Science 40(5): 659-675. doi: 10.1177/0306312710378549.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., G. Sundqvist 2010. “Sociology of Risk.” In Essentials of Risk Theory, edited by S. Roeser et al., 75–106. Springer Briefs in Philosophy. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, N. 2009. “Los Transgénicos Se Acercan Más [Gmos Approach more].” El Comercio, July 14. http://elcomercio.pe/impresa/notas/transgenicos-se-acercan-mas/20090713/313337
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 1995. “Ethnography In/Of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, F., and T. Pinzás. 2014. “Moratorium on the Entry of GMOs to Peru.” ETC Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio del Ambiente (MINAM). n.d. “Reglamento De La Ley No 29811, Ley Que Establece La Moratoria Al Ingreso Y Producción De Organismos Vivos Modificados Al Territorio Nacional Por Un Período De 10 Años.” [Regulation of Law No. 29811, Law that Establishes the Moratorium on the Entry and Production of Living Organisms Modified to the National Territory for a Period of 10 years].” Government of Peru, Lima, Peru.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, B. 2006. “Infringing and Trespassing Plants: Patented Seeds at Dispute in Canada’s Courts.” Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 48: 83–98. doi:10.3167/092012906780646361.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, E. G. 2016. “Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Report.” Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, E. G., and J. M. Beillard 2014. “Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Report.” Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, M. 2007. “En El Valle De Barranca Ya Existen Cultivos Transgénicos [In the Barranca Valley There are Already Transgenic crops].” El Comercio, November 7. https://elcomercio.pe/edicionimpresa/Html/2007-11-17/en_el_valle_de_barranca_ya_exi.html
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier, D. L. 2005. “Science, Law, and Politics in FDA’s Genetically Engineered Food Policy: Scientific Concerns and Uncertainties.” Nutrition Reviews 63 (6): 201–223. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00139.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, D. L. 2006. “FDA’s Regulation of Genetically Engineered Foods: Scientific, Legal, and Political Dimensions.” Food Policy 31 (6): 570–591. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. F. 2017. “Agnotology and the New Politicization of Science and Scientization of Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science, Edited by David Tyfield, Rebecca Lave, Samuel Randalls and Charles Thorpe. 341–350. New York and Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaiberg, A. 1977. “Obstacles to Environmental Research by Scientists and Technologists: A Social Structural Analysis.” Social Problems 24 (5): 500–520. doi:10.2307/800121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M., and J. Barandiarán. 2014. “Neoliberalism as Political Technology: Expertise, Energy, and Democracy in Chile.” In Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America, Edited by Eden Medina, Ivan da Costa Marques, and Christina Holmes., 305-330. MIT Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2018. “Corruption Perceptions Index 2018.” Transparency International, The Global Coalition Against Corruption, January 31. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, D. 2018. Liberalism 2.0 And the Rise of China: Global Crisis, Innovation and Urban Mobility. New York and Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Concerned Scientists. 2002. “Risks of Genetic Engineering.” http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/impacts_genetic_engineering/risks-of-genetic-engineering.html
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, E. T., and D. C. Abanto. 2015. “Conocimiento Y Actitud De La Población De La Ciudad De Cajamarca Sobre Los Alimentos Transgénicos [Knowledge and Attitude of the Population of the City of Cajamarca on Transgenic foods].” Revista Perspectiva 15 (1–2): 103-114.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva Ramirez, R. 2011. “Características De La Cuenca Del Río Santo [Characteristics of the Santo River basin].” Accessed 30 July 2019 http://mountain.pe/recursos/attachments/article/68/Folleto-1-Caracteristicas-Cuenca-Rio-Santa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, S. J. 2018. “Recent Trends in GE Adoption.” United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, July 16. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Winickoff, D., S. Jasanoff, L. Busch, R. Grove-White, and B. Wynne. 2005. “Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 30: 81–123.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F., and P. W. Butz. 2004. The Future of Genetically Modified Crops: Lessons from the Green Revolution. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar