3,727
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The practice of household waste minimisation

ORCID Icon
Pages 355-363 | Received 19 Nov 2019, Accepted 02 Jul 2020, Published online: 11 Aug 2020

References

  • Avfall Sverige. 2019. “Svensk Avfallshantering 2018.” https://www.avfallsverige.se/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationer/SAH_2019.pdf
  • Barnard, A. V. 2011. “‘Waving the Banana’ at Capitalism: Political Theater and Social Movement Strategy among New York’s ‘Freegan’ Dumpster Divers.” Ethnography 12 (4): 419–444. doi:10.1177/1466138110392453.
  • Barr, S., A. W. Gilg, and N. J. Ford. 2001. “Differences between Household Waste Reduction, Reuse and Recycling Behaviour.” Environmental & Waste Management 4 (2): 69–82.
  • Beckman, M. 2015. “Minimeringsmästarna – En Studie Av 29 Familjers Försök Att Minimera Sitt Avfall [Champions of Minimizing - a Study of 29 Families’ Efforts to Minimize Their Waste].” University of Gothenburg.
  • Bissmont, M. 2020. “Reducing Household Waste: A Social Practice Perspective on Swedish Household Waste Prevention.” Univerity of Malmö Dissertation.
  • Bortoleto, A. P., K. H. Kurisu, and K. Hanaki. 2012. “Model Development for Household Waste Prevention Behaviour.” Waste Management 32 (12): 2195.
  • Cherrier, H. 2009. “Anti-Consumption Discourses and Consumer-Resistant Identities.” Journal of Business Research 62 (2): 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.025.
  • Corvellec, H., E. Richard, N. Johansson, A. Svingstedt, P. Zapata, and M. José Zapata Campos. 2018. “Waste Prevention Is about Effective Production and Thoughtful Consumption – Not about Waste. Seven Lessons from the Research Project ‘From Waste Management to Waste Prevention’.” Lund, Sweden.
  • Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Edwards, F., and D. Mercer. 2007. “Gleaning from Gluttony: An Australian Youth Subculture Confronts the Ethics of Waste.” Australian Geographer 38 (3): 279–296. doi:10.1080/00049180701639174.
  • European Parliament. 2008. “Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives (Text with EEA Relevance).” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Gregson, N., A. Metcalfe, and L. Crewe. 2007. “Moving Things Along: The Conduits and Practices of Divestment in Consumption.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32 (2): 187.
  • Halkier, B. 2009. A practice theoretical perspective on everyday dealings with environmental challenges of food consumption. Anthropology of Food. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/aof.6405
  • Hawkins, G. 2006. The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish. Lanham, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Hawkins, G. 2011. “Plastic Bags: Living with Rubbish.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 4: 5–23.
  • Isenhour, C. 2010. “Building Sustainable Societies: Exploring Sustainability Policy and Practices in the Age of High Consumption.” University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. Paper 1.
  • Johnson, B. 2019. “How to Get Started.” Zero Waste Home. https://zerowastehome.com/2011/09/28/how-to-get-started/
  • Kellogg, K. 2020. “What Is Zero Waste?” Going Zero Waste. https://www.goingzerowaste.com/zero-waste-1
  • Kozinets, R. V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Markham, A., and E. Buchanan. 2012. “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0).” https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
  • Oldensjö, E. 2018. “The Practice of Influencing – How Zero Waste YouTubers Try to Influence the Reduction of Waste through Online Communities.” Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
  • Pedersen, M. K. 2017. “The Zero Waste Movement: A Case Study of Mundane Climate Change Activism in Denmark.” Malmö University.
  • Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward A Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
  • Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, and R. Ormston. 2013. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Røpke, I. 2009. “Theories of Practice — New Inspiration for Ecological Economic Studies on Consumption.” Ecological Economics 68: 2490–2497. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015.
  • Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
  • Shove, E. 2017. “CST Fall 2016 Distinguished Speaker - Dr Shove ‘Infrastructures and Practices’.” UK College of Arts & Sciences. https://vimeo.com/204070896
  • Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Thousand Oaks. CA, USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Svingstedt, A., and H. Corvellec. 2018. “When Lock-Ins Impede Value Co-Creation in Service.” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. doi:10.1108/IJQSS-10-2016-0072.
  • Vail, B. 2014. “Ecological Modernization at Work? Environmental Policy Reform in Sweden at the Turn of the Century.” In Environmental Sociology: From Analysis to Action., edited by L. King and D. McCarthy Auriffeille, 73–92. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Veblen, T. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. London, UK: Macmillan.
  • Warde, A. 2005. “Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153. doi:10.1177/1469540505053090.
  • Zamwel, E., O. Sasson-Levy, and G. Ben-Porat. 2014. “Voluntary Simplifiers as Political Consumers: Individuals Practicing Politics through Reduced Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (2): 199–217. doi:10.1177/1469540514526277.
  • Zapata, C., M. José, and P. Zapata. 2017. “Infiltrating Citizen-Driven Initiatives for Sustainability.” Environmental Politics 26 (6): 1055–1078. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1352592.