Environmental public interest litigation: new roles for civil society organizations in environmental governance in China

References

• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyninckx, H. 2009. “Environmental Evaluation Practices and the Issue of Scale.” New Directions for Evaluation 2009 (122): 31–39. doi:10.1002/ev.293.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and V. Castán Broto. 2013. “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3): 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, K., and R. L. Gruby. 2019. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (4): 927–952. doi:10.1111/psj.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geall, S., and I. Hilton. 2014. “China’s Environmental Governance Challenge.” In State of the World 2014, edited by L. Mastny, 129–137. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, D., O. Young, Y. Jing, B. Bramble, M. Bu, C. Chen, K. Furst, et al. 2018. “Environmental Governance in China: Interactions between the State and “Nonstate Actors””. Journal of Environmental Management 220: 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Journal of Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, G., Y. Lu, A. P. J. Mol, and T. Beckers. 2012. “Changes and Challenges: China’s Environmental Management in Transition.” Environmental Development 3: 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2012.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L. T., J. Van Vliet, and B. J. M. Van Vliet. 2007. “Niche Management and Its Contribution to Regime Change: The Case of Innovation in Sanitation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (6): 729–746. doi:10.1080/09537320701711215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S. 2008. “From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China’s Distinctive Policy Process.” The China Journal 59: 1–30. doi:10.1086/tcj.59.20066378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S., L. Shih, and A. Hofem. 2013. “National Planning and Local Technology Zones: Experimental Governance in China’s Torch Programme.” The China Quarterly 216: 896–919. doi:10.1017/S0305741013001057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. J. 2009. “Experimenting with Climate Governance.” Amsterdam Human Dimensions of Environmental Change Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2011. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. 2012. “Environmental Protests in China on Dramatic Rise, Expert Says.” South China Morning Post, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., M. Hildén, D. Huitema, A. Jordan, and J. Newig. 2017. “Experiments in Climate Governance–a Systematic Review of Research on Energy and Built Environment Transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. 2000. “Legal Reform in China: A Role for Nongovernmental Organizations.” Yale J. Int’l L 25: 363.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B., and F. Lijie. 2018. “Social Organizations and Community Service Delivery in China.” UNRISD Working paper, No, 2018-14. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/207014/1/166804773X.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., ed. 2016. Review of Public Interest Litigation in Environment Protection. China: Law Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., Y. Liu, S. Lin, Y. Liu, and Y. Xie. 2019. “Soil Pollution Management in China: A Brief Introduction.” Sustainability 11 (3): 556. doi:10.3390/su11030556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. 2018. “Constructing Legitimacy: How Do Chinese NGOs Become Legitimate Participants in Environmental Governance? The Case of Environmental Protection Law Revision.” The Journal of Chinese Sociology 5 (6). doi:10.1186/s40711-018-0076-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The Science Of” Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. 2014. “The Lost Innocence of Transparency in Environmental Politics.” In Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: A Critical Perspective, edited by A. Gupta and M. Mason, 39–59. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munck Af Rosenschöld, J., and S. A. Wolf. 2017. “Toward Projectified Environmental Governance?” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (2): 273–292. doi:10.1177/0308518X16674210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• The Project Report to MEP. 2017 on “Protecting Environmental Rights and Interests Project (2016)” (Internal document of FoN). 环境保护部政策法规司2016年环境权益维护项目验收总结报告
   Google Scholar
• Rooij, B. 2010. “The People Vs. Pollution: Understanding Citizen Action against Pollution in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 19 (63): 55–77. doi:10.1080/10670560903335777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2008. “Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU.” European Law Journal 14 (3): 271–327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2012. “Experimentalist Governance.” The Oxford Handbook of Governance 1: 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon, S. 2014. “Chinese Strategies of Experimental Governance. The Underlying Forces Influencing Urban Restructuring in the Pearl River Delta.” Cities 41: 194–199. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. 2016. China’s Environmental Challenges. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Spires, A. J. 2011. “Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China’s Grassroots NGOs.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (1): 1–45. doi:10.1086/660741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassey, G. 2014. “Innovation in Innovation Policy Management: The Experimental Technology Incentives Program and the Policy Experiment.” Science & Public Policy 41 (4): 419–424. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Teets, J. 2013. “Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China.” The China Quarterly 213 (March): 19–38. doi:10.1017/S0305741012001269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teets, J. C. 2015. “The Evolution of Civil Society in Yunnan Province: Contending Models of Civil Society Management in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 24 (91): 158–175. doi:10.1080/10670564.2014.918417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rooij, B., R. E. Stern, and K. Fürst. 2016. “The Authoritarian Logic of Regulatory Pluralism: Understanding China’s New Environmental Actors: Authoritarian Logic of Regulatory Pluralism.” Regulation & Governance 10 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1111/rego.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “White Paper on China’s Environmental Resource Trial. 2016, 2017, 2018). “Supreme Court of the People’s Republic of China.”
   Google Scholar
• Wilmsen, C. 2012. “Participation, Reciprocity, and Empowerment in the Practice of Participatory Research.” University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 23 April, 611–629.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. A. 2011. “Network Governance as Adaptive Institutional Response: The Case of Multifunctional Forested Landscapes.” Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3 (3): 223–235. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.591760.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., F. Berkhout, G. C. Gallopin, M. A. Janssen, E. Ostrom, and S. Van Der Leeuw. 2006. “The Globalization of Socio-ecological Systems: An Agenda for Scientific Research.” Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., A. P. J. Mol, and G. He. 2016. “Transparency and Information Disclosure in China’s Environmental Governance.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18: 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., and H. Zhao. 2018. “Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central–local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China.” Policy Studies Journal49 (1): 13–36.
   Google Scholar