Should we adapt nature to climate change? Weighing the risks of selective breeding in Pacific salmon

References

• Anderson, J.H., Warheit, K.I., Craig, B.E., Seamons, T.R., Haukenes, A.H. 2020. A review of hatchery reform science in Washington State. Washington: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
   Google Scholar
• Asayama, S., M. Sugiyama, and A. Ishii. 2017. “Ambivalent Climate of Opinions: Tensions and Dilemmas in Understanding Geoengineering Experimentation.” Geoforum 80: 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 1 (3): 385–405. doi:10.1177/146879410100100307.
   Google Scholar
• Beacham, T. D., C. Wallace, K. Jonsen, B. McIntosh, J. R. Candy, D. Willis, C. Lynch, J. Moore, L. Bernatchez, and R. E. Withler. 2019. “Comparison of Coded‐wire Tagging with Parentage‐based Tagging and Genetic Stock Identification in a Large‐scale Coho Salmon Fisheries Application in British Columbia, Canada.” Evolutionary Applications 12 (2): 230–254. doi:10.1111/eva.12711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., J. Lezaun, and J. Palmer. 2017. “Public Perceptions of Geoengineering Research Governance: An Experimental Deliberative Approach.” Global Environmental Change 45: 194–202. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berseth, V. 2022. “In Pursuit of Wildness: Genomic Science, Risk, and the Production of Wild Salmon.” PhD Diss., University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Berseth, V., and R. Matthews. 2021. “How ‘Wild’ are Hatchery Salmon? Conservation Policy and the Contested Framing of Nature in Canada and the United States.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4 (3): 1077–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Bissett, K. 2019. “Atlantic Salmon Federation raises concernsafter escape of farmed salmon.“ CTV News.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, G., and D. Davidson. 2021. “Co-producing Uncertainty in Public Science: The Case of Genomic Selection in Forestry.” Public Understanding of Science 30 (4): 455–469. doi:10.1177/0963662520982540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, G. 2017. “An Environmental Sociology for the Anthropocene.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 54 (1): 48–68. doi:10.1111/cars.12138.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R., and A. Stirling. 2014. “‘Maintaining Planetary Systems’ or ‘Concentrating Global Power?’ High Stakes in Contending Framings of Climate Geoengineering.” Global Environmental Change 28: 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, L., A. Mankad, E. V. Hobman, and N. B. Porter. 2021. “Playing God and Tampering with Nature: Popular Labels for Real Concerns in Synthetic Biology.” Transgenic Research 30 (2): 155–167. doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00233-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie M.R., Ford M.J. and Blouin M.S. 2014. “On the reproductive success of early‐generation hatchery fish in the wild“ Evolutionary Applications 7 (8): 883–896. doi:10.1111/eva.12183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, M.R., Marine, M.L., Fox, S.E., French, R.A. and Blouin, M.S. 2016. “A single generation of domestication heritably alters the expression of hundreds of genes.“ Nature Communications 7 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1038/ncomms10676.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, S., and R. J. Standish. 2018. “Novel Ecosystems: Governance and Conservation in the Age of the Anthropocene.” Journal of Environmental Management 208: 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombi, B. J. 2012. “Salmon and the Adaptive Capacity of Nimiipuu (Nez Perce) Culture to Cope with Change.” American Indian Quarterly 36 (1): 75–97. doi:10.5250/amerindiquar.36.1.0075.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. 2020. “Frankenfish or Food of the Future? The Risks and Rewards of Canada’s Genetically Engineered Salmon.” The Narwhal, December 22.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1996. “The Trouble with Wilderness.” Environmental History 1 (1): 20–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafoe, A. 2015. “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and A Mechanism.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (6): 1047–1076. doi:10.1177/0162243915579283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrset, G., L. Margaryan, and S. Stensland. 2022. “Local Knowledge, Social Identity and Conflicts around Traditional Marine Salmon fisheries–A Case from Mid‐Norway.” Fisheries Management and Ecology 29 (2): 131–142. doi:10.1111/fme.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbin, S. A. 2011. “The Problem with Problem Definition: Mapping the Discursive Terrain of Conservation in Two Pacific Salmon Management Regimes.” Society and Natural Resources 24 (2): 148–164. doi:10.1080/08941920903468639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 1983. “Salmon Enhancement in Newfoundland and Labrador.” https://waves-vagues.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/library-bibliotheque/103979.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2005. Wild Salmon Policy. Vancouver: Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2018. “Major SEP projects.” https://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sep-pmvs/projects-projets/index-eng.html
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, K. E., and M. Hulme. 2018. “Geoengineering at the ‘Edge of the World’: Exploring Perceptions of Ocean Fertilisation through the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation.” Geo: Geography and Environment 5 (1): e00054.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, S. M., and T. Satterfield. 2014. “Agreed but Not Preferred: Expert Views on Taboo Options for Biodiversity Conservation, Given Climate Change.” Ecological Applications 24 (3): 548–559. doi:10.1890/13-0400.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. 2006. “Tampering with Nature: ‘Nature’ and ‘Natural’ in Media Coverage of Genetics and Biotechnology.” Media Culture & Society 28: 811–834. doi:10.1177/0163443706067026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, H. L., J. Hauer, J. Ø. Nielsen, and Ø. Aas. 2019b. “Disputing Nature in the Anthropocene: Technology as Friend and Foe in the Struggle to Conserve Wild Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar).” Ecology and Society 24 (3): 13. doi:10.5751/ES-10945-240313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, H. L., S. Kochalski, R. Arlinghaus, and Ø. Aas. 2019a. “How We Talk about Hatcheries: What Discourses Can Tell Us about Conflict over the River Wye Salmon Stocking Debate, and Why Some Disagreements Get Worse over Time.” People and Nature 14.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, T. J. 2019. “Debating Nature: Science and Decision-making in Pacific Salmon Hatcheries.” MSc Diss., University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, G., B. Sütterlin, and M. Siegrist. 2021. “Tampering with Nature: A Systematic Review.” Risk Analysis 41 (1): 141–156. doi:10.1111/risa.13619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. A., H. Ross, T. Lynam, and P. Perez. 2014. “Eliciting Mental Models: A Comparison of Interview Procedures in the Context of Natural Resource Management.” Ecology and Society 19 (1): 13–20. doi:10.5751/ES-06248-190113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kai, L., M. C. M. Beveridge, and M. Mangel. 2012. “Cultured Fish: Integrative Biology and Management of Domestication and Interactions with Wild Fish.” Biological Reviews 87 (3): 639–660. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00215.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochalski, S., C. Riepe, M. Fujitani, Ø. Aas, and R. Arlinghaus. 2019. “Public Perception of River Fish Biodiversity in Four European Countries.” Conservation Biology 33 (1): 164–175. doi:10.1111/cobi.13180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, P. A., D. Brossard, D. A. Scheufele, and M. A. Xenos. 2019. “Public Views about Editing Genes in Wildlife for Conservation.” Conservation Biology 33 (6): 1286–1295. doi:10.1111/cobi.13310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, R. T. 2003. “Pacific Northwest Salmon: Forecasting Their Status in 2100.” Reviews in Fisheries Science 11 (1): 35–88. doi:10.1080/16226510390856529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., and C. Waterton. 2016. “Anthropocene–a Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology?” Environmental Sociology 2 (4): 395–406. doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841.
   Google Scholar
• Lill, A. F. 1985. “Salmonid Enhancement in B.C.-Past, Present, and Future.” Canadian Water Resources Journal 10 (2): 11–18. doi:10.4296/cwrj1002011.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, S. B., R. Clausen, and B. Clark. 2015. The Tragedy of the Commodity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinlay, D. D., S. Lehmann, J. Bateman, and R. Cook. 2004. “Pacific Salmon Hatcheries in British Columbia.” American Fisheries Society Symposium 44: 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Meffe, G. K. 1992. “Techno‐arrogance and Halfway Technologies: Salmon Hatcheries on the Pacific Coast of North America.” Conservation Biology 6 (3): 350–354. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030350.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minteer, B. A., and S. J. Pyne, eds. 2015. After Preservation: Saving American Nature in the Age of Humans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naish, K. A., J. E. Taylor III, P. S. Levin, T. P. Quinn, J. R. Winton, D. Huppert, and R. Hilborn. 2007. “An Evaluation of the Effects of Conservation and Fishery Enhancement Hatcheries on Wild Populations of Salmon.” Advances in Marine Biology 53: 61–194. doi:10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53002-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission (NPAFC). 2018. “NPAFC Statistics: Pacific Salmonid Catch and Hatchery Release Data.” https://npafc.org/statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Pecl, G. T., M. B. Araújo, J. D. Bell, J. Blanchard, T. C. Bonebrake, I.-C. Chen, T. D. Clark, et al. 2017. “Biodiversity Redistribution under Climate Change: Impacts on Ecosystems and Human well-being.” Science 355 (6332): 1–9. DOI:10.1126/science.aai9214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimi, K. T., K. S. Wolske, P. Sol Hart, and V. Campbell‐Arvai. 2020. “The Aversion to Tampering with Nature (ATN) Scale: Individual Differences in (Dis)comfort with Altering the Natural World.” Risk Analysis 40: 638–656. doi:10.1111/risa.13414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, D. and Renn, O. 2014. ”Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate.” Climatic Change 125 (3): 305–318. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1177-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, B. G. 2000. “A Case History: The Kokanee Stocks of Okanagan Lake.” In Proceedings of a Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk, 15-19 Feb. 1999, 2 Kamloops, edited by L. M. Darling, 609–616. Victoria: B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2017. “Cultivating the Wild.” In Wildness: Relations of People and Place, edited by G. Van Horn and J. Hausdoerffer, 228–232. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siipi, H. 2008. “Dimensions of Naturalness.” Ethics and the Environment 71–103. doi:10.2979/ETE.2008.13.1.71.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, J. J., D. K. Okamoto, D. Armitage, S. M. Alexander, C. Atleo, J. M. Burt, R. Jones, et al. 2022. “Fish, People, and Systems of Power: Understanding and Disrupting Feedback between Colonialism and Fisheries Science.” The American Naturalist 200 (1): 168–180. doi:10.1086/720152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. J. 2005. These Mountains are Our Sacred Places: The Story of the Stoney People. Calgary: Fifth House.
   Google Scholar
• Surprise, K. 2020. “Stratospheric Imperialism: Liberalism,(eco) Modernization, and Ideologies of Solar Geoengineering Research.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (1): 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. E. 1999. Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. E. 2016. The Rise of the American Conservation Movement: Power, Privilege, and Environmental Protection. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., N. Pidgeon, and E. Roberts. 2018. “Ambivalence, Naturalness and Normality in Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage in Biomass, Fossil Energy, and Industrial Applications in the United Kingdom.” Energy Research & Social Science 46: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, T., D. Deur, and H. Kitka. 2015. “Cultivation of Salmon and Other Marine Resources on the Northwest Coast of North America.” Human Ecology 43 (2): 189–199. doi:10.1007/s10745-015-9747-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P., and A. Vannini. 2016. Wilderness. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., J. Shi, M. Siegrist, and J. Arvai. 2017. “Beliefs and Values Explain International Differences in Perception of Solar Radiation Management: Insights from a cross-country Survey.” Climatic Change 142: 531–544. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1970-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M. L., and S. Lockie. 2018. “Sociology, Risk and the Environment: A material-semiotic Approach.” Journal of Risk Research 21 (9): 1077–1092. doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1422783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuerthner, G., E. Crist, and T. Butler, eds. 2014. Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. 2016. “Living in the Anthropocene: Towards a risk-taking Society.” Environmental Sociology 2 (4): 385–394. doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1233605.
   Google Scholar