Individual action, world society, and environmental change: 1993–2010

References

• Beck, U. (2014). Individualization is eroding traditions worldwide: A comparison between Europe and China. In U. Beck (Ed.), Ulrich beck. Pioneer in cosmopolitan sociology and risk society (pp. 91–99). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization. Institutionalised individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beckfield, J. (2010). The social structure of the world polity. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1018–1068. doi: 10.1086/649577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, H., & Mayerl, J. (2013). Postmaterialism and the environment: A multilevel analysis on the ‘objective problems, subjective values’ hypothesis using the ISSP. Paper presented at the WSSF, October, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. (2005). Female genital cutting: Cultural conflict in the global community. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E., McMorris, B. J., & Gómez, M. (2002). Local conformity to international norms: The case of female genital cutting. International Sociology, 17, 5–33. doi: 10.1177/0268580902017001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechin, S. R. (1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation. Social Science Quarterly, 80(4), 793–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discourse in history, civics, and social studies textbooks. Comparative Education Review, 55, 517–545. doi: 10.1086/660797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483–530. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, M., & Kalamas, M. (2014). Environmental locus of control. In J. Robertson & J. Barlings (Ed.), The psychology of Green organisations (pp. 187–212). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2013). Conditional decoupling assessing the impact of national human rights institutions, 1981 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 78, 702–725. doi: 10.1177/0003122413492762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington: QCPress.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., & Rohrschneider, R. (Ed.). (2015). Environmental concerns during a time of distress. Environmental Politics. Special Issue. 24/4.
   Google Scholar
• Deeming, C., & Jones, K. (2015). Investigating the macro determinants of self-rated health and well-being using the European social survey: Methodological innovations across nations and time. International Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 256–285. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2015.1098175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 335–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Downes, D., Hunold, C., Schlosberg, D., & Hernes, H.-K. (2003). Green states and social movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway and environmental politics in Japan, Germany and the United States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482–524). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. (2013). Rich people, poor people, and environmental concern: Evidence across nations and time. European Sociological Review, 29, 910–922. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcs068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, D., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96–116. doi: 10.2307/2657291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1001–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillham, P. (2008). “Participation in the environmental movement: Analysis of the European union”. International Sociology, 23, 67–93. doi: 10.1177/0268580907084386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens, J., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2013). Individual environmental concern in the world polity: A multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 42, 418–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M., & Telesiene, A. (Eds.). (2016). Green European: Environmental behaviour and attitudes in Europe in a historical and cross-cultural comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, G., & Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadler, M. (2012). The influence of world societal forces on social tolerance. A time comparative study of individual prejudices in 32 countries. The Sociological Quarterly, 53, 211–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01232.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadler, M., & Haller, M. (2011). Globally motivated activists and nationally driven recyclers. The influence of global linkages and national contexts on individual environmental behavior. International Sociology, 26, 315–345. doi: 10.1177/0268580910392258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights practices in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1373–1411. doi: 10.1086/428442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2008). Dispositions to act in favor of the environment: Fatalism and readiness to make sacrifices in a cross-national perspective. In Sociological Forum, 23(2), 281–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate. Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 3859, 1243–1248.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M., and Reynolds, J. (2004). Incorporating categorical information into regression models. The utility of dummy variables. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 229–255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hironaka, A. (2002). The globalization of environmental protection: The case of environmental impact assessment. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 65–78. doi: 10.1177/002071520204300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hironaka, A. (2014). Greening the globe. World society and environmental change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 677–694. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 28, 57–72. doi: 10.1017/S1049096500056080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R., & Meyer, J. (1991). The public order and the construction of formal organisations. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The New institutionalism in organisational analysis (pp. 204–231). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, A., Dick, C., & Mahutga, M. (2007). Foreign investment dependence and the environment: An ecostructural approach. Social Problems, 54, 371–394. doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, A., Dick, C., & Shandra, J. (2011). World economy, world society, and environmental harms in less-developed countries. Sociological Inquiries, 81, 53–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2010.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle, M., Rau, H., & Fahy, F. (2016). Different shades of green? Unpacking habitual and occasional pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 35(2015), 368–378.
   Google Scholar
• Longhofer, W., & Schofer, E. (2010). National and global origins of environmental association. American Sociological Review, 75, 505–533. doi: 10.1177/0003122410374084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2012). Contextual influence on environmental concern cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social Science Research, 41, 1085–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsson, J., & Lundqvist, L. J. (2010). Ecological citizenship: Coming out ‘clean’ without turning ‘green’?. Environmental Politics, 19(4), 518–537. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2010.489709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk-activism. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90. doi: 10.1086/228463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. (2007). Reflections on institutional theories of organisations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Shalin-Andersson (Eds.), Handbook of organisational institutionalism (pp. 788–809). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., & Ramirez, F. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181. doi: 10.1086/231174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierotti, R. (2013). Increasing rejection of intimate partner violence. Evidence of global cultural diffusion. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 240–265. doi: 10.1177/0003122413480363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. O. (2012). The world society perspective: Concepts, assumptions, and strategies. Comparative Education, 48(4), 423–439. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2012.693374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66, 806–828. doi: 10.2307/3088874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Hironaka, A. (2005). World society and environmental protection outcomes. Social Forces, 84, 25–47. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., Hironaka, A., Frank, D., & Longhofer, W. (2012). Sociological institutionalism and world society. In E. Amenta, K. Nash, & A. Scott (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 57–68). Oxford: Blackwell Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. 1. (2014). Institutions and organisations. Ideas, interests, and identities. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shandra, J., Esparza, L., & London, B. (2012). Nongovernmental organisations, democracy, and deforestation: A cross-national analysis. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 251–269. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.573841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandra, J., Leckband, C., McKinney, L., & London, B. (2009). Ecologically unequal exchange, world polity, and biodiversity loss: A cross-national analysis of threatened mammals. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50, 285–310. doi: 10.1177/0020715209105143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorette, K. (2012). Outcomes of global environmentalism: Longitudinal and cross-national trends in chemical fertilizer and pesticide use. Social Forces, 91, 299–325. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Wiest, D. (2012). Social movements in the world-system. The politics of crisis and transformation. New York: Russel Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 748–761. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, K. (2004). Global civil society and ethnic social movements in the contemporary world. Sociological Forum, 19(1), 63–87. doi: 10.1023/B:SOFO.0000019648.21481.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, K., & Shin, H.-J. (2008). Global norms, local activism and social movement outcomes: Global human rights and resident Koreans in Japan. Social Problems, 55, 391–418. doi: 10.1525/sp.2008.55.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2015). United Nations Statistical Databases. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/databases.htm
   Google Scholar
• UN Conference on Trade and Development. (2015). Retrieved from http://unctad.org/
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2014). United Nations Environment Program. Geodata portal. Retrieved from http://geodata.grid.unep.ch/
   Google Scholar
• Union of International Associations. (various years). Yearbook of international organisations. Munich: K.G. Saur.
   Google Scholar
• Vasi, B. (2007). Thinking globally, planning nationally, and acting locally. Nested organisational fields and the adoption of environmental practices. Social Forces, 86, 113–136. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velitchkova, A. (2015). World culture, uncoupling, institutional logics, and recoupling: practices and self-identification as institutional microfoundations of political violence. Sociological Forum, 30(3), 698–720. doi: 10.1111/socf.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, C., and McCright, A. (2012). A test of the biographical availability argument for gender differences in environmental behaviors. Environment and Behavior. Published online before print August 9, 2012. doi: 10.1177/0013916512453991ch
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. (2013). Public support for international human rights institutions: A cross-national and multilevel analysis. Sociological Forum, 28(3), 525–548. doi: 10.1111/socf.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar