From collective representations to social imaginaries: How society represents itself to itself

References

• Abric, J.-C. (2001). L’approche structurale des représentations sociales: Développements récents. Psychologie et Société, 4(2), 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, S., Blokker, P., Doyle, N. J., Krummel, J. W., & Smith, J. C. (2015). Social imaginaries in debate. Social Imaginaries, 1(1), 15–52. doi: 10.5840/si2015112
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1996). Writings on psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan (O. Corpet & F. Matheron, Eds., J. Mehlman, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1991). Philosophy, politics, autonomy: Essays in political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (2007). The psyche and society anew. In C. Castoriadis (Ed.), Figures of the thinkable (pp. 203–220). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chartier, J.-F., & Meunier, J. G. (2011). Text mining methods for social representation analysis in large corpora. Papers on Social Representations, 20(37), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, F. (2010). On the nature of collective beliefs. L’Année Sociologique, 60(1), 63–91. doi: 10.3917/anso.101.0063
   Google Scholar
• Cormack, P. (1996). The paradox of Durkheim’s manifesto: Reconsidering ‘the rules of sociological method’. Theory and Culture, 25, 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doise, W., Clemence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1893/1953). Suicide ( J. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). The rules of sociological method (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Edited with an introduction by Steven Lukes. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1898). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 6(3), 273–302.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1912/2001). The elementary forms of the religious life ( Carol Cosman, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1978). Note on social morphology. In M. Traugott (Ed. and Trans.), On institutional analysis (pp. 88–90). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falasca-Zamponi, S. (2014). Society as representation: Durkheim, psychology and the ‘dualism of human nature’. Durkheimian Studies, 20, 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In J. W. Bernauer & D. M. Rasmussen (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gafijczuk, D. (2005). The way of the social: From Durkheim’s society to a postmodern sociality. History of the Human Sciences, 18(3), 17–33. doi: 10.1177/0952695105059304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, B., & Seyfert, R. (2016). Collective identities, empty signifiers and solvable secrets. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 111–126. doi: 10.1177/1368431015573364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 375–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. (1982). Raymond Williams and the problem of ideology. Boundary 2, 11(1/2), 145–154. doi: 10.2307/303022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1348/014466605X43777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, P., & Latané, B. (1996). Social representations as dynamic social impact. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on ‘social representations'. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 195–209. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (2001). Écrits: A selection ( A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits ( B. Fink, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (2013). On the names-of-the-father. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahlou, S. (2003). L’exploration des représentations sociales à partir des dictionnaires. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 37–58). Saint-Agne, France: ERES.
   Google Scholar
• Lahlou, S. (2015). Social representations and social construction: The evolutionary perspective of installation theory. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 193–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view (1st ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Memos, C. (2016). Castoriadis and social theory: From marginalization to canonization to re-radicalization. In A. Law & E. Lybeck (Eds.), Sociological amnesia. Cross-currents in disciplinary history (pp. 181–195). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moliner, P., & Tafani, E. (1997). Attitudes and social representations: A theoretical and experimental approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(6), 687–702. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199711/12)27:6<687::AID-EJSP839>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes toward a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis, its image and its public (D. Macey, Trans.) [originally published as ‘Psychoanalysis, Son Image et Son Public’ by Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1961]. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Némedi, D. (1995). Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations: Durkheim's sociology of knowledge, 1894-1900. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 41–56. doi: 10.2307/1389261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Némedi, D. (2000). A change in ideas: Collective consciousness, morphology and collective representations. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 83–97). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogien, A. (2016). Durkheim as a sociologist of knowledge: Rudiments of a reflexive theory of the concept. Journal of Classical Sociology, 16(1), 7–20. doi: 10.1177/1468795X13497139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I. (1987). 'Social representations’: Social psychology's (mis) use of sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17(4), 447–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1987.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peristiany, J. (1906/1974). Introduction (D. F. Pocock, Trans.). In É. Durkheim (Ed.), Sociology and philosophy (pp. i–xxv). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. (1994). On the theory of ideology – Althusser’s politics. In T. Eagleton (Ed.), Ideology (pp. 141–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Randeraad, N. (2010). States and statistics in the nineteenth century: Europe by numbers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., Levine, M., & Rath, R. (2005). Entrepreneurs of hate and entrepreneurs of solidarity: Social identity as a basis for mass communication. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(860), 621–637. doi: 10.1017/S1816383100184462
   Google Scholar
• Roudinesco, É. (1990). Jacques Lacan and Co.: A history of psychoanalysis in France ( J. Mehlman, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Durkheim's dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory, 20(2), 227–247. doi: 10.1111/1467-9558.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmaus, W. (2009). Rethinking Durkheim and his tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. (2014). Psyche. In S. Adams (Ed.), Cornelius Castoriadis: Key concepts (pp. 75–88). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Stedman Jones, S. (1995). Charles Renouvier and Emile Durkheim: “Les règles de la méthode sociologique”. Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 27–40. doi: 10.2307/1389260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1), 91–124. doi: 10.1215/08992363-14-1-91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. (1982). Ideology and the social imaginary: An appraisal of Castoriadis and Lefort. Theory and Society, 11(5), 659–681. doi: 10.1007/BF00182263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. P. (1995). Durkheim's “The Rules of Sociological Method: Is it a Classic?” Sociological Perspectives, 38(1), 1–14. doi: 10.2307/1389258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: A British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11(4), 431–454. doi: 10.1177/1354067X05058586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachelke, J. (2013). Beyond social representation: The conceptual bases of the structural approach on social thinking. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Valencia, J., & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the ‘hot’ stable core social representations – a structural analysis of word associations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 331–351. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (1993). Althusser on ideology: A reassessment. New Political Science, 14(1), 47–66. doi: 10.1080/07393149308429699
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. (1999). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar