The steep and slippery slope of politics: Civic spirit, empowerment, and politicisation in citizen committees

References

• Alexander, J., & Smith, P. (1993). The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural Studies. Theory and Society, 22(2), 151–207.
   Google Scholar
• Bacqué, M.-H., & Biewener, C. (2013). The politics of urban renewal in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 2198–2213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, M. (2000). Associations. Un nouvel âge de la participation. Paris: Presses de la FNSP.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1963/1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A., Klein, T. P., Savell, S., & Baiocchi, G. (2013). Disavowing politics: Civic engagement in an Era of political scepticism. American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 518–548. doi: 10.1086/674006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. (1998). Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3, 4), 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (1993). La souffrance à distance. Morale humanitaire, média et politique. Paris: Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De La justification: Les economies de La grandeur. Paris: Gallimard Nrf Essais.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, P. L. (2000). The Neo-liberal uses of the social economy: Non-profit organizations and workfare in ontario. In E. Shragge, & J.-M. Fontan, (Eds.), Social economy: International debates and perspectives (pp. 65–80). Montréal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Céfaï, D. (2011). Remarques conclusives : Vers une ethnographie (du) politique. Décrire des ordres d’interaction, analyser des situations sociales. In M. Berger, D. Céfaï, & C. Gayet-Viaud (Eds.), Du civil au politique. Ethnographies du vivre-ensemble (pp. 545–598). Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, P., & Uslaner, E. (2001). Social capital and participation in everyday life. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donzel, A. (2001). Métropolisation, gouvernance et citoyenneté dans La région urbaine marseillaise. Aix-en-Provence: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Duchesne, S., & Haegel, F. (2002). Avoiding or accepting conflict in public talk. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 1–22. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000014
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, R. (2003). Studying civic culture ethnographically and what it tels us about social capital : Communities in the west of Ireland. In P. Dekker, & E. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 59–72). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare's End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2016). The mantra of empowerment talk. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 247–265. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1215895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N., & Lichterman, P. (2003). Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794. doi: 10.1086/367920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezop-Québec. (1981). Une ville à vendre. Laval, Québec: Éditions coopératives Albert Saint-Martiné.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, R., & Moscovici, S. (1984). Social representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1985). What's critical about critical theory? New German Critique, 35, 97–131. doi: 10.2307/488202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, A. (2010). The case for multinational federalism: Beyond the All-encompassing nation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrow, E., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2014). Institutional logics, moral frames, and advocacy: Explaining the purpose of advocacy among nonprofit human-service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 80–98. doi: 10.1177/0899764012468061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. (1989). Contextualization and Understanding. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report 59.
   Google Scholar
• Hamidi, C. (2003). Lire le capital social. Autour de robert putnam. Revue Française de Science Politique, 53(4), 607–613. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.534.0607
   Google Scholar
• Hamidi, C. (2006). Eléments pour une approche interactionniste de la politisation. Engagement associatif et rapport au politique dans des associations locales issues de l’immigration. Revue Française de Science Politique, 56(1), 5–25. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.561.0005
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in america: An interpretation of American political thought since the revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Huard, R. (2000). Political association in nineteenth century France: Legislation and practice. In N. Bermeo & P. Nord (Eds.), Civil society before democracy: Lessons from nineteenth century Europe (pp. 135–153). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jetté, C. (2011). The role of community organizations in the transformation of the social development model in québec. Canadian Journal of Non-Profit and Social Economy Research, 2(1), 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2003). Who counts as ‘them?’ racism and virtue in the United States and France. Contexts, 2(6), 36–41. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2003.2.4.36
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (eds.). (1992). Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Politics and repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Presses de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J.-L., Lévesque, B., & Mendell, M. (2007). The social economy: Diverse approaches and practices in Europe and in Canada. Montréal: Cahiers de l’ARUC-ÉS.
   Google Scholar
• Law. (1901). Loi du 1er juillet 1901 relative au contrat d’association. [In French]. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006069570
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P. (2006). Social capital or group style? Rescuing tocqueville’s insights on civic engagement. Theory and Society, 35, 529–563. doi: 10.1007/s11186-006-9017-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P., & Céfai, D. (2006). The idea of political culture. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextuatical analysis (pp. 392–414). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P., & Eliasoph, N. (2014). Civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 129(3), 798–863. doi: 10.1086/679189
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1986). Historical traditions and national characteristics. A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 11(2), 113–155. doi: 10.2307/3340795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhtakallio, E. (2012). Practicing democracy. Local activism and politics in France and Finland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, N. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 265–291. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattina, C. (2007). Changes in clientelism and urban government: A comparative case study of naples and marseilles. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 73–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, J., & Neal, Z. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozouf, M. (2014). Jules ferry. La liberté et la tradition. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Patsias, C. (2016). Une chronique de la démocratie ordinaire. Les comités de citoyens au Québec et en France. Montréal: Les Presses Universitaires de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political Theory, 9(3), 327–352. doi: 10.1177/009059178100900304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2003). Culture is Not just in your head. In J. Goodwin & J. Jasper (Eds.), Rethinking social movements (pp. 97–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1177/0951692891003003001
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki, F., & Siméant, J. (2009). Décloisonner la sociologie de l’engagement militant. Note critique sur quelques tendances récentes des travaux français. Sociologie du travail 51(1), 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘New institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1989). How culture works: Perspective from media studies on the efficacy of symbols. Theory and Society, 18(2), 153–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00160753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shragge, E. (2003). Activism and social change: Lessons for community and local organizing. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silber, I. (2003). Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology. Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 427–449. doi: 10.1177/13684310030064004
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociology Review, 51(2), 273–286. doi: 10.2307/2095521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (2001). What anchors cultural practices. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practical turn (pp. 83–101). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Thede, N. (1998). L'identité ethnique des Gitans de la basse Andalousie. Doctoral Dissertation, Université de Montréal, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1986). La France conteste de 1600 à nos jours. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A. (1831/1969). Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. K. (2012). Putting inequality in Its place: Rural consciousness and the power of perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 517–532. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (1999). Democratic theory and trust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 310–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. (2006). Governing Advocacy and Dissent in the Partnership State: Canadian Stories. Paper for the International Conference of the International Society for the Third Sector Research, Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. (1987). Impartiality and the civic public. Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp.56–76). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar