259
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Composing urban green collaboration: Exploring coordination in long-term civic–municipal greenspace planning

ORCID Icon
Pages 477-501 | Received 23 Jan 2020, Accepted 28 Apr 2020, Published online: 07 Jul 2020

References

  • Agger, A. , & Damgaard, B. (2018). Interactive policy processes: A challenge for street-level bureaucrats. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration , 22 (3), 89–108.
  • Agger, A. , & Lund, D. H. (2017). Collaborative innovation in the public sector – New perspectives on the role of citizens? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration , 21 (3), 17–37.
  • Blok, A. , & Meilvang, M. L. (2015). Picturing urban green attachments: Civic activists moving between familiar and public engagements in the city. Sociology , 49 (1), 19–37. doi: 10.1177/0038038514532038
  • Boltanski, L. , & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bulkeley, H. (2006). Urban sustainability: Learning from best practice? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space , 38 (6), 1029–1044. doi: 10.1068/a37300
  • Christensen, A. G. , Krarup, T. , Juvik, A. K. , & Laage-Thomsen, J. (2020). Fælleshed som bynaturens sted: Metodologiske tilgange til familiært engagement i bygrønne fællesskaber. Dansk Sociologi , 30 , 4.
  • Christensen, A. G. , Laage-Thomsen, J. , & Blok, A. (2019). Urban green communities: Towards a pragmatic sociology of civic commonality in sustainable city-making. In J. Hoff , Q. Gausset , & S. Lex (Eds.), The role of non-state actors in the green transition: Building a sustainable future . London: Routledge.
  • Duvall, P. , Lennon, M. , & Scott, M. (2018). The ‘natures’ of planning: Evolving conceptualizations of nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies , 26 (3), 480–501. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1404556
  • Eranti, V. (2017). Re-visiting NIMBY: From conflicting interests to conflicting valuations. Sociological Review , 65 (2), 285–301. doi: 10.1177/0038026116675554
  • Ferreri, M. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera; Leicester , 15 (1), 181–191.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry , 12 (2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
  • Healey, P. (1996). The Communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial Strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 23 (2), 217–234. doi: 10.1068/b230217
  • Hoff, J. (2016). ‘Think globally, act locally’: Climate change mitigation and citizen participation. In J. Hoff , & Q. Gausset (Eds.), Community governance and citizen driven initiatives in climate change mitigation (pp. 28–54). London : Routledge.
  • Holifield, R. (2018). Just green spaces of urban politics: A pragmatist approach. In K. Ward , A. E. G. Jonas , B. Miller , & D. Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on spaces of urban politics (1st ed., Vol. 1 (pp. 146–156). London : Routledge.
  • Karvonen, A. (2015). Pathways of urban nature: Diversity in the greening of the twenty-first-century city. In J. Hou , B. Spencer , T. Way , & K. Yocom (Eds.), Now Urbanism: The future city is here (pp. 274–286). London : Routledge.
  • Laage-Thomsen, J. , & Blok, A. (2020a). Varieties of green: On aesthetic contestations over urban sustainability pathways in a Copenhagen community garden. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space , doi:10.1177/2514848620902806
  • Laage-Thomsen, J. , & Blok, A. (2020b). Civic modes of greening the city? Urban natures in-between familiar engagement and green critique. Local Environment , 25 (2), 162–178. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1714568
  • Lichterman, P. , & Eliasoph, N. (2014). Civic action. American Journal of Sociology , 120 (3), 798–863. doi: 10.1086/679189
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services . Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Luhtakallio, E. (2019). Group formation, styles, and grammars of commonality in local activism. The British Journal of Sociology , 70 (4), 1159–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12606
  • Meilvang, M. L. , Carlsen, H. B. , & Blok, A. (2018). Methods of engagement: On civic participation formats as composition devices in urban planning. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology , 5 (1–2), 12–41. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2018.1452621
  • Molin, J. F. , & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2014). Between Big ideas and daily Realities – The roles and perspectives of Danish municipal green space managers on public involvement in green space maintenance. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 13 (3), 553–561. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.03.006
  • OECD . (2011). Together for better public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society . OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org .
  • Pink, S. , & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-Term ethnography: Intense Routes to Knowing: Short-term ethnography. Symbolic Interaction , 36 (3), 351–361. doi: 10.1002/symb.66
  • Pløger, J. (2014). Impossible common ground: Planning and reconciliation. In J. Metzger , P. Allmendinger , & S. Oosterlynck (Eds.), Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance (pp. 107–128). New York : Routledge.
  • Qvist, H.-P. Y. , Henriksen, L. S. , & Fridberg, T. (2018). The consequences of weakening Organizational attachment for Volunteering in Denmark, 2004–2012. European Sociological Review , 34 (5), 589–601. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcy030
  • Rosol, M. (2010). Public participation in Post-Fordist urban green space Governance: The case of community Gardens in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 34 (3), 548–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
  • Sørensen, E. , & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces. Urban Affairs Review , 54 (2), 388–418. doi: 10.1177/1078087416651936
  • Tavory, I. (2018). Between situations: Anticipation, Rhythms, and the theory of interaction. Sociological Theory , 36 (2), 117–133. doi: 10.1177/0735275118777007
  • Thévenot, L. (2001a). Organized complexity: Conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements. European Journal of Social Theory , 4 (4), 405–425.
  • Thévenot, L. (2001b). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In T. R. Schatzki , K. Knorr Cetina , & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–73). London : Routledge.
  • Thévenot, L. (2002). Which Road to Follow? The Moral Complexity of an “Equipped” Humanity. In J. Law , A. Mol , B. H. Smith , & E. R. Weintraub (Eds.), Complexities (pp. 53–87). Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
  • Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology , 1 (1), 7–34. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2014.905749
  • Thévenot, L. (2015). Making commonality in the plural, on the basis of binding engagements. In P. Dumouchel , & R. Gotoh (Eds.), Social bonds as freedom: Revising the dichotomy of the universal and the particular (pp. 82–108). New York : Berghahn.
  • Thévenot, L. , Moody, M. , & Lafaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont , & L. Thevenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology (pp. 229–272). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Uggla, Y. (2014). Protecting urban Greenery: The case of Stockholm’s National city park. City & Community , 13 (4), 360–380. doi: 10.1111/cico.12085
  • United Nations . (2019). Sustainable development goals . United Nations Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ .
  • Wachsmuth, D. , & Angelo, H. (2018). Green and gray: New ideologies of nature in urban sustainability policy. Annals of the American Association of Geographers , 108 (4), 1038–1056. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1417819

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.