Domesticating startup culture in Finland

References

• Research material
   Google Scholar
• Helaniemi, K., Kuronen, A., & Väkeväinen, V. (2018). Kutsuvat sitä pöhinäksi. Tositarinoita kasvuyrittäjyydestä. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Järvilehto, L. (2018). Kiitorata. Startup-maailman molemmat puolet. Helsinki: Tammi.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., & Kari, M. (2017). Yritä, erehdy, onnistu. Helppo opas yrittäjyyteen. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Kormilainen, V. (2015). Kukaan ei puhu Fruugosta. Tarinoita startup-Suomesta. Kauppakamari: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusela, S. (2013). Hupparhörhö ja bisnesmies. Opas startup-kulttuurin ymmärtämiseen. Finnish Business & Policy Forum: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Saloranta, A. (2018). No exit. Kuinka tapoin rakkaani ja muita tarinoita startup-maailmasta. Oulu: Luova Laboratorio.
   Google Scholar
• Vimma, T. (2018). Enkeleitä ja yksisarvisia. Startup-Suomen tarina. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Literature
   Google Scholar
• Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562. doi: 10.1177/1350508412448695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Introduction. In P. Alasuutari, & A. Qadir (Eds.), National Policy making: Domestication of global trends (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atomico. (2019). The State of European Tech 2019. Retrieved from https://2019.stateofeuropeantech.com/chapter/key-findings/.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Rannikko, H., Handelberg, J., & Kiuru, P. (2014). Analyses on the Finnish high-growth entrepreneurship ecosystem. Aalto University: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, S. (2006). The four steps to the Epiphany. Successful Strategies for products that Win. Pescadero, CF: K&S Ranch.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup Owner’s Manual. Step-by-step guide for building a Great company. Pescadero, CF: K&S Ranch.
   Google Scholar
• Brockling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth revolution. New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, C., & Dahlberg, S. (2018). The Law of Jante and Generalized Trust. Acta Sociologica, 61(4), 419–440. doi: 10.1177/0001699317717319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. (2018). Brotopia. Breaking Up the Boys’ Club of Silicon Valley. New York: Portfolio Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong, & S. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages. technology, politics and ethics as Anthropological problems (pp. 3–22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Egan-Wyer, C., Muhr, S. L., & Rehn, A. (2018). On startups and doublethink – resistance and conformity in negotiating the meaning of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(1–2), 58–80. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2017.1384959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, D. (2010). Constellations of Another other: The case of Aquarian nation. In F. Bill, B. Bjerke, & A. W. Johansson (Eds.), De-mobilizing the entrepreneurship discourse. Exploring entrepreneurial thinking and action (pp. 179–197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–555. doi: 10.1086/660866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. M. (2008). Post-mao professionalism. self-enterprise and patriotism. In L. Zhang, & A. Ong (Eds.), Privatizing China: socialism from Afar (pp. 168–181). New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyrkäs, A. (2016). Startup complexity. Tracing the conceptual shift behind disruptive entrepreneurship. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, A. (2014). Unholy Alliances: Competitiveness as a domestic power Strategy. In P. Alasuutari, & A. Qadir (Eds.), National policy making: Domestication of global trends (pp. 44–60). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, A., & Kuusela, H. (2019). Huipputuloiset. Suomen rikkain promille. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. (2011a). The sellers of labour power as social citizens – A Utopian wage work society in the Nordic visions of welfare. In H. Blomberg, & N. Kildal (Eds.), Workfare and welfare state legitimacy. NordWel studies in historical welfare state research I (pp. 16–45). Jyväskylä: Bookwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. (2011b). Welfare nationalism and competitive community. In A. Suszycki (Ed.), Welfare citizenship and welfare nationalism. NordWel studies in historical welfare state research II (pp. 79–117). Jyväskylä: Bookwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. (2012). Kansallinen toimijuus suomalaisessa politiikassa. In K. Paakkunainen (Ed.), Suomalaisen politiikan murroksia ja muutoksia (pp. 75–98). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlenberger, J. (2015). The new formula for cool. science, technology, and the popular in the American Imagination. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, H., & Saarinen, A. (2019). Innovaatioita, kasvua ja yrittäjämäisiä kansalaisia. Yrittäjyyspuhe suomalaisissa hallitusohjelmissa 1979–2015. Sosiologia, 56(2), 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, A., & Ester, P. (2016). Silicon Valley, Planet startup. disruptive innovation, passionate entrepreneurship and hightech startups. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maliranta, M., Pajarinen, M., & Rouvinen, P. (2018). Startups in the economy. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2018). Geopolitics of the knowledge-based economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. (2010). Contemporary political sociology. Globalization, politics, and power. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta, V. (2013). The Helsinki Spring: An Essay on entrepreneurship and cultural change. Research on Finnish Society, 6, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 32(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perren, L., & Jennings, P. (2005). Government discourses on entrepreneurship: Issues of legitimization, subjugation, and power. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 173–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2011). The Lean startup. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2017). The startup way. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global Modernities (pp. 22–44). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salmenniemi, S., & Adamson, M. (2015). New heroines of labor: Domesticating post-feminism and neoliberal capitalism in Russia. Sociology, 49(1), 88–105. doi: 10.1177/0038038513516830
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional Advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (2006). The new Argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, C. (2016). The Psychic life of neoliberalism: Mapping the contours of entrepreneurial subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107–122. doi: 10.1177/0263276415590164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. ((2010) [1943]). Capitalism, socialism & democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovska, A., & Swiatek, D. (2010). Domesticating neo-liberalism. spaces of economic practice and social reproduction in post-socialist cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Syväterä, J. (2016). Creation and domestication of global Policy trends. Tampere: University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Tiyanen-Qadir, T., & Salmenniemi, S. (2017). Self-help as a glocalised therapeutic assemblage. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(4), 381–396. doi: 10.1177/1367549417718205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, T. (2014). Success of Angry Birds Reflects Growth of Young Entrepreneurship in Finland. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/sep/08/finland-entrepreneurship-young-social-problems-lifestyle-angry-birds.
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2012). Dimensions of innovationism. In P. Nynäs, M. Lassander, & T. Utriainen (Eds.), Post-secular society (pp. 129–156). London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2013). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2014). Enhancing Europe’s Competitiveness. Fostering Innovation-driven Entrepreneurship in Europe. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EuropeCompetitiveness_FosteringInnovationDrivenEntrepreneurship_Report_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. (2019). The role of scientific knowledge in dealing with complex policy problems under conditions of uncertainty. Policy & Politics, 48(2), 259–276. doi: 10.1332/030557319X15707904457648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Ong, A. (eds.). (2008). Privatizing China: Socialism from Afar. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar