Contention and social order: The historical relation between political and social riot dispositives

References

• Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus and other essays. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (1768). A letter to an august assembly, on the present posture of affairs: Wherein the hard treatment of Mr. Wilkes, and the cause of riots, are duly considered, and remedies provided. London: L. Tomlinson.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bagguley, P., & Hussain, Y. (2008). Riotous citizens: Ethnic conflict in multicultural britain. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, D. G. (2008). Patrick Colquhoun, the Scottish Enlightenment and police reform in Glasgow in the late eighteenth century. Crime, Histoire & Sociétés, 12(2), 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Black, E. C. (1963). The association: British extraparliamentary political organization, 1769–1793. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolingbroke, H. (1967a). The works of Lord Bolingbroke I. London: Frank Cass & Co Ltd. (Original work published 1844).
   Google Scholar
• Bolingbroke, H. (1967b). The works of Lord Bolingbroke II. London: Frank Cass & Co Ltd. (Original work published 1844).
   Google Scholar
• Boonen, C. (2020). At the outer limits of democratic division: On citizenship, conflict and violence in the work of Chantal Mouffe and Étienne Balibar. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 33(2), 529–544.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. (1976). Party ideology and popular politics at the accession of George III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgh, J. (1775). Political disquisitions: Or, an enquiry into public errors, defects, and abuses. London: Edward and Charles Dilly.
   Google Scholar
• Burtt, S. (2006). Virtue transformed: Political argument in England, 1688–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (2003). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, P. (1806a). A treatise on indigence. London: J. Watchard.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, P. (1806b). A treatise on the police of the metropolis (7th ed.). London: Bye and Law.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D., Ward, G., & Owens, P. B. (2019). Configuring political repression: Anti-civil rights enforcement in Mississippi. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 24(3), 319–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. T. (2008). The mob club? The London Corresponding Society and the politics of civility in the 1790s. In M. T. Davis, & P. A. Pickering (Eds.), Unrespectable radicals? (pp. 21–40). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. T. (2015). Reformers no rioters’: British radicalism and mob identity in the 1790s. In M. T. Davis (Ed.), Crowd actions in Britain and France from the Middle Ages to the modern world (pp. 146–162). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1991). The constitution of poverty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., & Villadsen, K. (2016). State phobia and Civil Society: The political legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). What is a dispositif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Philosopher (pp. 159–168). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delpech, Q. (2015). Concealed repressions: Labor organizing campaigns and antiunion practices in the apparel industry of Guatemala. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(3), 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, F. M. (2004). ‘Civic’ police and the condition of liberty: The rationality of governance in eighteenth-century England. Social History, 29(2), 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, F. M. (2007). Police and the prevention of crime: Commerce, temptation and the corruption of the body politic, from Fielding to Colquhoun. British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 439–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, F. M. (2008). The idea of police in eighteenth-century England: Discipline, reformation, superintendence, c. 1780–1800. Journal of the History of Ideas, 69(4), 583–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodsworth, F. M. (2019). The security society: History, patriarchy, protection. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 44–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2004). Controlling protest: New directions for research on the social control of protest. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 25, 55–83.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2011). Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 261–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, H. (1751). An enquiry into the causes of the late increase of robbers, &c (2nd ed.). London: A Millar.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). The confession of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge (pp. 194–228). New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. T. (2015). Austerity and protest: Popular contention in times of economic crisis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (1979). The friends of liberty: The English democratic movement in the age of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, J. (2021). The political signification of riots: A dispositive perspective on the 2011 England riots. Journal of Sociology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/14407833211037399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, J. (2022a). A sociological perspective on the experience of contention. Sociological Theory. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/07352751221097115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, J. (2022b). The constitution of political contention: The case of protests and riots at the turn of the 19th century. Current Sociology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/00113921221084359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. (2020, June 4). What is the goal of the protests, and which tactics are morally justified and strategically wise? The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2020/06/04/what-is-the-goal-of-the-protests-and-which-tactics-are-morally-justified-and-strategically-wise/
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, T., & Shoemaker, R. (2015). London lives: Poverty, crime and the making of a modern city, 1690–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hörnqvist, M. (2016). Riots in the welfare state: The contours of a modern-day moral economy. European Journal of Criminology, 13(5), 573–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, O. (1771). An historical essay on the English constitution. London: Edward and Charles Dilly.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, A. (1999). Governing morals: A social history of moral regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. (2009). Inferior politics: Social problems and social policies in eighteenth-century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W. (1782). An inquiry into the legal mode of suppressing riots. London: C. Dilly.
   Google Scholar
• Kienscherf, M. (2016). Beyond militarization and repression: Liberal social control as pacification. Critical Sociology, 42(7–8), 1179–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M., & Waddington, D. (2004). Coping with disorder? The changing relationship between police public order strategy and practice—a critical analysis of the burnley riot. Policing and Society, 14(2), 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• LCS. (2002a). The London Corresponding society’s addresses and resolutions. In M. T. Davis (Ed.), London Corresponding Society I (pp. 77–81). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1792).
   Google Scholar
• LCS. (2002b). Narrative of the proceedings at a general meeting of the London Corresponding society. In M. T. Davis (Ed.), London Corresponding Society II (pp. 67–81). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1795).
   Google Scholar
• LCS. (2002c). Reformers no rioters. In M. T. Davis (Ed.), London Corresponding Society I (pp. 289–296). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1794).
   Google Scholar
• LCS. (2002d). The report &c. In M. T. Davis (Ed.), London Corresponding Society I (pp. 335–349). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1794).
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, I. M., & Gabay, N. (2018). Tax policy and tax protest in 20 rich democracies, 1980–2010. The British Journal of Sociology, 69(3), 647–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, M. (2012). Supporting the civil power: Citizen soldiers and the Gordon Riots. The London Journal, 37(1), 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. R. (1999). Cops and bobbies: Police authority in New York and London, 1830–1870 (2nd ed.). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Abindon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neocleous, M. (2000). The fabrication of social order: A critical theory of police power. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nippel, W. (1985). “Reading the riot act”: The discourse of law-enforcement in 18th century England. History and Anthropology, 1(2), 399–426.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. (2008). Repression and crime control: Why social movement scholars should pay attention to mass incarceration as a form of repression. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 13(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, M. (2020). Agonistic democracy: Rethinking political institutions in pluralist times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, A., & Wahlström, M. (2015). Repression: The governance of domestic dissent. In D. Della Porta, & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 634–652). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1992). Normalizing collective protest. In A. Morris, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 301–325). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1993). Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1971).
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (1985). Virtue, commerce, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raffnsøe, S., Gudmand-Høyer, M., & Thaning, M. S. (2016). Foucault’s dispositive: The perspicacity of dispositive analytics in organizational research. Organization, 23(2), 272–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, A. (2006). Riotous assemblies: Popular protest in Hanoverian England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. A. (1998). Before the bobbies: The night watch and police reform in metropolitan London, 1720–1830. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, C. (1968). The eighteenth century commonwealthman. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, N. (1998). Crowds, culture, and politics in Georgian Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudé, G. (1962). Wilkes and liberty: A social study of 1763 to 1774. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudé, G. (2005). The crowd in history: A study of popular disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848. London: Serif.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, A. (1967). The demand for order in civil society: A review of some themes in the history of urban crime, police, and riot. In S. Poole (Ed.), The police: Six sociological essays (pp. 1–24). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2010). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprunt, B. (2020, May 29). The history behind ‘when the looting starts, the shooting starts’. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/05/29/864818368/the-history-behind-when-the-looting-starts-the-shooting-starts
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. (1992). Popular Disturbances in England 1700-1832. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thale, M. (1983). Selections from the papers of the London Corresponding Society 1792–1799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, J. (1795). Peaceful discussion and not tumultuary violence the means of redressing national grievance. London: J. Thelwall.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (1991). Customs in common. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. (2013). The making of the English working class. London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Thörn, H., Mayer, M., & Thörn, C. (2016). Re-thinking urban social movements, ‘riots’ and uprisings: An introduction. In M. Mayer, C. Thörn, & H. Thörn (Eds.), Urban uprisings: Challenging neoliberal urbanism in Europe (pp. 3–55). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain 1750–1834. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Towers, J. (1769). Observations on public liberty, patriotism, ministerial despotism, and national grievances with some remarks on riots, petitions, loyal addresses and military execution. London: J. Towers.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1969). The public perception of protest. American Sociological Review, 34(6), 815–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale, A. S. (2017). The End of Policing. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K. (2021). ‘The dispositive’: Foucault’s concept for organizational analysis? Organization Studies, 42(3), 473–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2015). Everyday politics, social practices and movement networks: Daily life in Barcelona’s social centres. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 236–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar