REFERENCES
- Abraham, T., S.Balzarini, and A.Frantilla. “What is Backlog is Prologue: A Measurement of Archival Processing.” American Archivist48 (1985): 31–44.
- Bearman, David. Archival Methods. Pittsburgh PA: Archives and Museums Informatics, 1989.
- Bulow. “Collection Management Using Preservation Risk Assessment.” Journal of the Institute of Conservation33 (2010): 65–78.
- Chapman, A. “Collection-level Descriptions: Joining up the Domains.” Journal of the Society of Archivists25, no. 2 (2004): 149–174.
- Cook, Michael. The Management of Information from Archives. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.
- Cook, Terry. “Viewing the World Upside Down: Reflections on the Theoretical Underpinnings of Archival Public Programming.” Archivaria31 (1990): 123–134.
- Cosgrave, R. “The AIM25 Project.” Journal of the Society of Archivists24, no. 2 (2003): 159–174.
- Cox, Robert. “Maximal Processing, or, Archivist on a Pale Horse.” Journal of Archival Organisation8 (2010): 134–148.
- Crowe, S., and K.Spilman. “MPLP @ 5: More Access, Less Backlog?” Journal of Archival Organisation8 (2010): 110–133.
- Duff, Wendy, and AllysonFox. ““You're a Guide rather than an Expert:” Archival Reference from an Archivist's Point of View.” Journal of the Society of Archivists27, no. 2 (2006): 129–153.
- Eriksen, P., and R.Shuster. “Beneficial Shocks: The Place of Processing-Cost Analysis in Archival Administration.” American Archivist58 (1995): 32–52.
- Gorzalski, M. “Minimal Processing: Its Context and Influence in the Archival Community.” Journal of Archival Organisation6, no. 3 (2008): 186–200.
- Greene, M., and D.Meissner. “More Product, Less Process: Revamping Traditional Archival Processing.” American Archivist68 (2005): 208–263.
- McCrea, D. “Getting More for Less: Testing a New Processing Model at the University of Montana.” American Archivist69 (2006): 284–290.
- Methven, Patricia. “Performance Measurement and Standards.” Journal of the Society of Archivists11, no. 3 (1990): 78–84.
- Ness, Carl van. “Much Ado about Paper Clips: “More Product, Less Process” and the Modern Manuscript Repository.” American Archivist73 (2010): 129–145.
- Procter, Margaret, and MichaelCook. Manual of Archival Description, 3rd ed.Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited, 2000.
- Prom, C. “Optimum Access? Processing in College and University Archives.” American Archivist73 (2010): 146–174.
- Sabre, J., and S.Hamburger. “A Case for Item-Level Indexing: The Kenneth Burke Papers at the Pennsylvania State University.” Journal of Archival Organisation6 (2008): 24–46.
- Strom, M. “Texas-sized Progress: Applying Minimum-Standards Processing Guidelines to the Jim Wright Papers.” Archival Issues29 (2005): 105–112.
- Weideman, C. “Accessioning as Processing.” American Archivist69 (2006): 274–283.
- Williams, Caroline. Managing Archives: Foundations, Principles and Practice. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2006.
- Yakel, Elizabeth. “Archival Representation.” Archival Science3 (2003): 1–25.
- Yakel, Elizabeth. “Hidden Collections in Archives and Libraries.” OCLC Systems & Services21, no. 2 (2005): 95–99.