References
- Cook, Terry. “‘Many Are Called, but Few Are Chosen’: Appraisal Guidelines for Sampling and Selecting Case Files.” Archivaria 32 (1991): 25–50. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11759/12709.
- Cook, Terry. “‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 32, no. 2 (2011): 173–189. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.
- Eastwood, Terry. “Digital Appraisal: Variations on a Theme.” Paper presented at the Conference on Appraisal in the Digital World, Rome, November 15–16, 2007.
- 4C – Collaboration to Clarify the Cost of Curation. The Digital Curation Sustainability Model (DCSM). Accessed November 6, 2015. http://www.4cproject.eu/dcsm
- Gollins, Timothy, Graham McDonald, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. “On Using Information Retrieval for the Selection and Sensitivity Review of Digital Public Records.” Proceeding of the 1st International Workshop on Privacy-Preserving IR: When Information Retrieval Meets Privacy and Security (PIR 2014), Australia, July 11, 2014. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1225/pir2014_submission_9.pdf.
- Harvey, Ross. “Instalment on ‘Appraisal and Selection’.” DCC Digital Curation Manual, 2007. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/resource/curation-manual/chapters/appraisal-and-selection/appraisal-and-selection.pdf.
- Hull, Felix. The Use of Sampling Techniques in the Retention of Records. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/ramp/html/r9006e/r9006e04.htm
- InterPARES. Appraisal Task Force Report. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.interpares.org/book/interpares_book_e_part2.pdf
- Kepley, David R. “Sampling in Archives: A Review.” The American Archivist 47, no. 3 (1984): 237–242. http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.47.3.kj041746214p6u1v.10.17723/aarc.47.3.kj041746214p6u1v
- Kolish, Evelyn. “Sampling Methodology and Its Application: An Illustration of the Tension Between Theory and Practice.” Archivaria 38 (1994): 61–73.
- The National Archives. “Step 3: Sensitivity Reviews of Selected Records.” Accessed June 25, 2015.http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/manage-information/selection-and-transfer/sensitivity-reviews-on-selected-records/.
- Niu, Jinfang. “Appraisal and Selection for Digital Curation.” International Journal of Digital Curation 9, no. 2 (2014): 65–82. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v9i2.267.
- Paradigm. “Appraising Digital Records: A Worthwhile Exercise?” Chap. 4 in Workbook on Digital Private Papers. 2008. http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/appraisal/digital-appraisal.html.
- Paradigm. “Recommended Approaches to Appraising Personal Archives.” Chap. 4 in Workbook on Digital Private Papers. 2008. http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/appraisal/appraisal-approaches.html.
- Paradigm. “Practical Solutions Advocated by the Paradigm Project.” Chap. 4 in Workbook on Digital Private Papers. 2008. http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/appraisal/practical-appraisal.html.
- Paradigm. “Useful Appraisal Tools.” Chap. 4 in Workbook on Digital Private Papers. 2008. http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/appraisal/directory-tools.html.
- Redwine, Gabriela, Megan Barnard, Kate Donovan, Erika Farr, Michael Forstrom, and Will Hansen. Jeremy Leighton John, Nancy Kuhl, Seth Shaw and Susan Thomas, Born Digital: Guidance for Donors, Dealers, and Archival Repositories. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2013. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub159/pub159.pdf.
- Wellcome Library. “2.3 Phase 3: Assessment Prior to Online Publication.” Access to Personal Data within Our Research CollectionsI, 14–21. London: Wellcome Trust, 2014. http://wellcomelibrary.org/content/documents/policy-documents/access-to-personal-data.pdf.