Police casework recordkeeping in England and Wales: an archival denial of evidence

Bibliography

• [APP Archiving] College of Policing. APP on Archiving of Records in the Public Interest. Coventry: College of Policing, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• [APP Review] College of Policing. Review, Retention and Disposal. Authorized Professional Practice (APP), 2023. Coventry: College of Policing, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Barrie, and George Ellison. Police Procedure and Evidence in the Criminal Justice System, edited by Tony Blockley. St Albans: Critical Publishing, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, Teresa. “Heritage Maturity Model.” National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) Portfolio (2022): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Katherine. “Evidence from the Archive: Implementing the Court Information Act in NSW.” Sydney Law Review 33 (2013): 575–598.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Katherine. In Crime’s Archive: The Cultural Afterlife of Evidence. Abingdon UK: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Katherine, and Trish Luker. “Evidence and the Archive: Ethics, Aesthetics, and Emotion.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 40, no. 1 (2014): 1–14. doi:10.1080/13200968.2014.937893.
   Google Scholar
• College of Policing. Management of Police Information (MOPI). Coventry: College of Policing, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• [FSR-C-100] The Forensic Science Regulator. Codes of Practice and Conduct for Forensic Science Providers and Practitioners in the Criminal Justice System (FSR-C-100) Issue 7. Birmingham: FSR, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, Peter. “The Case File: Problems of Acquisition and Access from the Federal Perspective.” Archivaria no. 6 (1978): 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Polledo, E. J., and Silvia Posocco. “Archives, Promises, Values: Forensic Infrastructures in Times of Austerity.” Critique of Anthropology 41, no. 1 (2021): 3–20. doi:10.1177/0308275X20974079.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. “A Hillsborough Legacy: The Government’s Response to Bishop James Jones’ Report to Ensure the Pain and Suffering of the Hillsborough Families Is Never Repeated.” 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. “Forensic Science Strategy. A National Approach to Forensic Science Delivery in the Criminal Justice System(Cm 9217).” (March 2016a).
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. “A Review of the Functions, Efficiency and Governance of FAL.” (April 2016b): 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• The House of Commons. “The Patronizing Disposition of Unaccountable Power.” a Report to Ensure the Pain and Suffering of the Hillsborough Families Is Not Repeated.” 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ilerbaig, Juan. “Specimens as Records: Scientific Practice and Recordkeeping in Natural History Research.” The American Archivist 73, no. 2 (2010): 463–482. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.607470v482172220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katherine, Biber, Trish Luker, and P. Vaughan Law’s Documents. Authority, Materiality, Aesthetics. London: Routledge, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, Carole, and Louise Shorter. “Police Retention and Storage of Evidence in England and Wales.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 22, no. 2 (2020): 123–136. doi:10.1177/1461355719891741.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, Carole, and Louise Shorter “‘You Don’t Know What You’ve Got ‘Til it’s Gone’: Police Retention of Investigative Materials.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 26, no. 1 (2023): 94–106. doi:10.1177/14613557231203493.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan, Jennifer. “Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.” Archivaria 61 (2006): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• The National Archives. Operational Selection Policy (OSP48) – Case Files. 2009. Accessed June 13, 2024. https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/osp48.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The National Archives (TNA). Principles for Determining the Access Status of Records on Transfer (May 2016: June 2019). Accessed June 13, 2024. https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/principles-for-determining-the-access-status-of-records-on-transfer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The National Archives (TNA). Access to Public Records. December. 2015. Accessed June 13, 2024. https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The National Archives (TNA). Archive Service Accreditation Standard. June 2018. Accessed June 13, 2024. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archive-service-accreditation/#:~:text=Archive%20Service%20Accreditation%20is%20the,overview%20of%20Archive%20Service%20Accreditation.
   Google Scholar
• [NPCC-2] Marshall, S. Retention, Storage and Destruction of Materials and Records Relating to Forensic Examination. National Police Chiefs’: Council, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• The Public Records Act 1958 (1958 c. 51 6 and 7 Eliz 2). Accessed March 2, 2023. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/6-7/51.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Paul. Criminal Evidence. 2nd ed. USA: OUP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmanith, Kate. “Plots and Artefacts: Courts and Criminal Evidence in the Production of True Crime Writing.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 40, no. 1 (2014): 97–111. doi:10.1080/13200968.2014.931903.
   Google Scholar
• Second Report of Session 2013. Forensic Science, #610.Science and Technology Committee
   Google Scholar
• Scully, Kelly “[NPCC-1] National Digital and Physical Evidence Retention Guidance. NPCC Digital and Physical Evidence Group.” (2021): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Nigel. “Access to Records of Crime at the National Archives.” Legal Information Management 16, no. 2 (2016): 99–101. doi:10.1017/S1472669616000244.
   Google Scholar