Brain Painting V2: evaluation of P300-based brain-computer interface for creative expression by an end-user following the user-centered design

References

• Münßinger JI, Halder S, Kleih SC, et al. Brain painting: first evaluation of a new brain–computer interface application with ALS-patients and healthy volunteers. Front Neurosci [Internet] 2010;4:182. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2996245/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, et al. The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e112392. eng.10.1371/journal.pone.0112392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim AA, Hinterberger T, Richter J, et al. Neural internet: Web surfing with brain potentials for the completely paralyzed. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(4):508–515.10.1177/1545968306290661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotrophic Lateral Scler. 2010;11(5):449–455.10.3109/17482961003777470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb R, Perdikis S, Tonin L, et al. Transferring brain–computer interfaces beyond the laboratory: successful application control for motor-disabled users. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59(2):121–132.10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda ER, Magee WL, Wilson JJ, et al. Brain-Computer Music Interfacing (BCMI): from basic research to the real world of special needs. Music Med. 2011;3(3):134–140.10.1177/1943862111399290
   Google Scholar
• van de Laar B, Brugman I, Nijboer F, et al. BrainBrush, a multimodal application for creative expressivity. In: Miller L, editor. Sixth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions (ACHI 2013), nice, France. Redhook, NY, USA: IARIA XPS Press; 2013. p. 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241–210 Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407), (ISO). International Organization for Standardization; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(4):235–248.10.1080/17483100701343665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi YM, Sprigle SH. Approaches for evaluating the usability of assistive technology product prototypes. Assistive Technol. 2011;23(1):36–41.10.1080/10400435.2010.541407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Halder S, Kleih SC, et al. Brain painting: usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59(2):99–110. eng.10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Völker S, Gunesch L, et al. Spelling is just a click away - a user-centered brain-computer interface including auto-calibration and predictive text entry. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:72. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K, Kübler A. Toward brain computer interfacing. Massachusetts Inst Technol. 2007;1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Schulz SM, Grünzinger C, et al. Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(5):056016.10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz EM, Botrel L, Kaufmann T, et al. Long-term independent brain-computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S16–S26.10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botrel L, Reuter P, Holz EM, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference 2014. The Future of Brain-Computer Interaction: Basics, Shortcomings, Users. Graz University of Technology, Austria; 2014. p. 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk G, McFarland DJ, Hinterberger T, et al. BCI2000: a general-purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(6):1034–1043.10.1109/TBME.2004.827072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinegger A, Faller J, Halder S, et al. Control or non-control state: that is the question! An asynchronous visual P300-based BCI approach. J Neural Eng. 2015;12(1):014001. eng.10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/014001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz EM, Kaufmann T, Franz D, et al. Brain drawing: first evaluation results. In: Proceedings of the 3rd TOBI Workshop, Würzburg, Germany; 2012. p. 109–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Schulz SM, Köblitz A, et al. Face stimuli effectively prevent brain–computer interface inefficiency in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(5):893–900.10.1016/j.clinph.2012.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SG. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: HFES; 2006. 904–908.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels RD, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Occup Ther Int [Internet] 1999;6(3):159–175. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.95.10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0703
   Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Riccio A, Leotta F, et al. A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42(4):236–244.10.1177/155005941104200409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Neumann N, Kaiser J, et al. Brain-computer communication, self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1533–1539.10.1053/apmr.2001.26621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SC, Armstrong W, Thomas C. Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy, a control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bull. 1998;123(2):143–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Laar B, Bos D, Reuderink B, et al. How much control is enough? Influence of unreliable input on user experience. Cybern IEEE Trans. 2013;43(6):1584–1592.10.1109/TCYB.2013.2282279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualotto E, Simonetta A, Gnisci V, et al. Toward a usability evaluation of BCIs. Int J Bioelectromagnetism. 2011;13(3):121–122.
   Google Scholar
• Riccio A, Leotta F, Bianchi L, et al. Workload measurement in a communication application operated through a P300-based brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025028. eng.10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloise F, Aricò P, Schettini F, et al. A covert attention P300-based brain-computer interface: Geospell. Ergonomics 2012;55(5):538–551. eng.10.1080/00140139.2012.661084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvinage M, Castermans T, Petieau M, et al. A subjective assessment of a P300 BCI system for lower-limb rehabilitation purposes. Conference proceedings: … Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2012;2012:3845–3849. eng.
   Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Riccio A, Leotta F, et al. A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42(4):236–244.10.1177/155005941104200409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011;12(5):318–324. eng.10.3109/17482968.2011.572978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar