Artistic brain-computer interfaces: the expression and stimulation of the user’s affective state

References

• Vidal J. Toward direct brain-computer communication. In: Mullins LJ, editor. Annual review of Biophysics and Bioengineering. Vol. 2. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.; 1973. p. 157–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zander TO, Kothe C. Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: applying brain–computer interface technology to human–machine systems in general. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:025005.10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühl C, Allison B, Nijholt A, et al. A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2014;1:66–84.10.1080/2326263X.2014.912881
   Google Scholar
• Gürkök H, Nijholt, A. Affective brain-computer interfaces for arts. 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligence Interaction. IEEE; 2013. p. 827–831.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenboom D, editor. Biofeedback and the arts: results of early experiments. Vancouver: A.R.C. Publications; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Smuts, A. Are video games art? In: Contemporary aesthetics p.3. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick C. Aesthetic theory and the video game. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• van de Laar B, Gürkök H, Plass-Oude Bos D, et al. Experiencing BCI control in a popular computer game. IEEE Trans Comput Intell AI Games. 2013;5:176–184.10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2253778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires G, Torres M, Casaleiro N, et al. Playing Tetris with non-invasive BCI. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2011 IEEE 1st International Conference on. IEEE; 2011, November. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Münßinger JI, Halder S, Kleih SC, et al. Brain painting: first evaluation of a new brain–computer interface application with ALS-patients and healthy volunteers. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plass-Oude Bos D, Reuderink B, Van de Laar BLA, et al. Brain-computer interfacing and games. In: Brain-computer interfaces. Applying our minds to human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction series. London: Springer Verlag; 2010. p. 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Vega KFC, Fuks H. Empowering electronic divas through beauty technology. In: Design, user experience, and usability. User experience in novel technological environments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013, p. 237–245.
   Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Budd J, Jackson MM, et al. A visual feedback design based on a brain-computer interface to assist users regulate their emotional state. In: Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems – CHI EA ’14 2014, 2491–2496.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves B, Nass C. How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan PJ, Vega KFC. Future fashion–at the interface. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Chanel G, Mühl C. Connecting brains and bodies: applying physiological computing to support social interaction. Interact Comput. 2015;27:534–550.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva LC, Morikawa C, Petra IM. State of the art of smart homes. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2012;25:1313–1321.10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabalona R, Grossi F, Tessadri A, et al. Home smart home: brain-computer interface control for real smart home environments. In Proceedings of the 4th international convention on rehabilitation engineering & assistive technology. Singapore Therapeutic, Assistive & Rehabilitative Technologies (START) Centre; 2010. p. 51.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds E, Everitt D, Macaulay M, et al. On physiological computing with an application in interactive art. Interact Comput. 2004;16:897–915.10.1016/j.intcom.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmquist LE, Skog T. Informative art: information visualization in everyday environments. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia. ACM; 2003. p. 229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Allison BZ, Dunne, S, et al. A preliminary survey on the perception of marketability of brain-computer interfaces and initial development of a repository of BCI companies. In: 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference, BCI 2011, 22-24 September 11th, Graz, Austria. 2011. p. 344–347.
   Google Scholar
• Venthur B, Blankertz B, Gugler MF, et al. Novel applications of BCI technology: psychophysiological optimization of working conditions in industry. In Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE; 2010. p. 417–421.
   Google Scholar
• Ducao A, Tseng T, von Kapri A. Transparent: brain computer interface and social architecture. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 posters. ACM; 2012, August. p. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Gluhak A, Bandara U, Presser M, et al. UbiClub – A context-aware environment for nightclub entertainment and management, capturing context and context aware systems and platforms – Joint e-SENSE, MAGNET beyond, DAIDALOS, and CRUISE workshop. Island, Greece: Mykonos; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler R. Computers and art: a dancer's perspective. IEEE Technol Soc Mag. 1997;16:7–14.10.1109/44.605946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan J, Bryan-Kinns N, Reeves S, et al. Graffito: crowd-based performative interaction at festivals. In CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2011. p. 1129–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Michalowski MP, Sabanovic S, Kozima H. A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE; 2007. p. 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bond J. Robot Quadrotors perform James Bond theme [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sUeGC-8dyk
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield G. Robot paintings evolved using simulated robots. In Applications of evolutionary computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006. p. 611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Kudoh S, Ogawara K, Ruchanurucks M, et al. Painting robot with multi-fingered hands and stereo vision. Rob Auton Syst. 2009;57:279–288.10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsson M, Fernaeus Y, Cramer H, et al. Crafting against robotic fakelore: on the critical practice of Artbot artists. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2013. p. 2019–2028.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Yu C, Wang Y, et al. FOCUS: enhancing children’s engagement in reading by using contextual BCI training sessions. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2014. p. 1905–1908.
   Google Scholar
• Andujar M, Gilbert JE. Let’s learn!: enhancing user’s engagement levels through passive brain-computer interfaces. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2013. p. 703–708.
   Google Scholar
• Andujar M, Ekandem JI, Gilbert JE, et al. Evaluating engagement physiologically and knowledge retention subjectively through two different learning techniques. In Human-computer interaction. Applications and services. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Sobell N. Streaming the brain. MultiMedia. 2002;9: 4–8. IEEE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt T, Menschaert L. VALENCE: affective visualisation using EEG. Digital Creativity. 2012;23:272–277.10.1080/14626268.2012.719240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmandt-Besserat D. Tokens: the cognitive significance. Documenta Praehistorica. 1999;21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Vande Moere, A. Beyond the tyranny of the pixel: exploring the physicality of information visualization. In Information Visualisation, 2008. IV’08. 12th International Conference. IEEE; 2008. p. 469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Budd J, Jackson MM, et al. A visual feedback design based on a brain-computer interface to assist users regulate their emotional state. In CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2014. p. 2491–2496.
   Google Scholar
• Heiner JM, Hudson SE Tanaka K. The information percolator: ambient information display in a decorative object. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM; 1999. p. 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Dahley A, Wisneski C, Ishii H. Water lamp and pinwheels: ambient projection of digital information into architectural space. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 1998. p. 269–270.
   Google Scholar
• Artists Uses Brainwaves to Manipulate the Motions of Water. 2013, December 4. Available from: http://neurogadget.com/2013/12/04/artist-uses-brainwaves-to-manipulate-the-motions-of-water/9104
   Google Scholar
• NAODesign. 2006. infornoptix - digital pyrotechnic matrix, URL. Available from: http://www.infernoptix.com/
   Google Scholar