Brain-computer interface for the communication of acute patients: a feasibility study and a randomized controlled trial comparing performance with healthy participants and a traditional assistive device

References

• Vincent JL. Communication in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23(10):1093–1098. 10.1007/s001340050462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig AJ, Katz R, Sahgal V. Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(1):24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank Lopresti EF, Mihailidis A, Kirsch N. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(1-2):5–39. 10.1080/09602010343000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson R, Koester H, LoPresti E. Evaluation of an adaptive row/column scanning system. Technol Disabil. 2006;18(3):127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson RC, Koester HH. Adaptive one-switch row-column scanning. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999;7(4):464–473. 10.1109/86.808950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biswas P, Robinson P. A new screen scanning system based on clustering screen objects. J Assist Technol. 2008;2(3):24–31. 10.1108/17549450200800023
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal JJ. Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1973;2:157-180. Epub 1973/01/01. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.02.060173.001105. PubMed PMID: 4583653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birbaumer N. Breaking the silence: brain?computer interfaces (bci) for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology. 2006;43(6):517-532. Epub 2006/11/02. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00456.x. PubMed PMID: 17076808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(2):164–173 . Epub 2000/07/15 PubMed PMID: 10896178. 10.1109/TRE.2000.847807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teplan M. Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Meas Sci Rev. 2002;2(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Neat GW, et al. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;78(3):252–259 . Epub 1991/03/01 PubMed PMID: 1707798. 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton TW. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;9(4):456–479 . Epub 1992/10/01 PubMed PMID: 1464675. 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaper M, Meinicke P, Grossekathoefer U, et al. BCI competition 2003—data set iib: support vector machines for the p300 Speller Paradigm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(6):1073-1076, 0018-9294. 10.1109/TBME.2004.826698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krusienski DJ, Sellers EW, McFarland DJ, et al. Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;167(1):15.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11(5):449–455. 10.3109/17482961003777470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K-R, Blankertz B. Toward non-invasive brain-computer interfaces. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Grozea C, Voinescu CD, Fazli S. Bristle-sensors–low-cost flexible passive dry EEG electrodes for neurofeedback and BCI applications. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025008. Epub 2011/03/26. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025008. PubMed PMID: 21436526.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu F, Fazli S, Badower Y, et al. Single trial classification of motor imagination using 6 dry EEG electrodes. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(7):e637. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000637
   Google Scholar
• Sellers E, Turner P, Sarnacki W, et al. A novel dry electrode for brain-computer interface. Human-Computer Interaction Novel Interaction Methods Tech. 2009:623-631. 10.1007/978-3-642-02577-8
   Google Scholar
• Hornecker A. Dear customers, dear friends of brain products. Brain. 2009;33.
   Google Scholar
• Renard Y. In the focus. Brain. 2010;37.
   Google Scholar
• Emotiv E. Software Development Kit. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jiang X, Cao T, et al., editors. Implementation of SSVEP based BCI with emotiv EPOC. Virtual Environments Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems (VECIMS), 2012 IEEE International Conference on; 2012: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Duvinage M, Castermans T, Dutoit T, et al., editors. A P300-based quantitative comparison between the emotiv epoc headset and a medical eeg device. biomedical engineering/765: telehealth/766: assistive technologies. ACTA Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stytsenko K, Jablonskis E, Prahm C, editors. Evaluation of consumer EEG device emotiv epoc. MEi: CogSci Conference 2011, Ljubljana; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers EW, Donchin E. A P300-based brain–computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(3):538–548. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubler A, Nijboer F, Mellinger J, et al. Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1775-1777, 0028-3878. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccione F, Giorgi F, Tonin P, et al. P300-based brain computer interface: reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(3):531–537.10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCane L, Vaughan TM, McFarland DJ, et al. Evaluation of individuals with ALS for in-home use of a P300 brain-computer interface. Soc Neurosci, Submitted. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Narayan Raju VN, Sankar R, Arbel Y, Donchin E. Advances and challenges in signal analysis for single trial P300-BCI. foundations of augmented cognition directing the future of adaptive systems. Springer; 2011. p. 87–94. 10.1007/978-3-642-21852-1
   Google Scholar
• Khan OI, Kim S-H, Rasheed T, Khan A, Kim T-S, editors. Extraction of P300 using constrained independent component analysis. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009 EMBC 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rivet B, Souloumiac A, Attina V, et al. xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials: application to brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(8):2035–2043. 10.1109/TBME.2009.2012869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakotomamonjy A, Guigue V, Mallet G, et al. Ensemble of SVMs for improving brain computer interface P300 speller performances. Artificial Neural Netw: Biol Inspirations–ICANN 2005. 2005:45-50.
   Google Scholar
• Patrone M, Lecumberry F, Martín Á, Ramirez I, Seroussi G. EEG Signal Pre-processing for the p300 speller. progress in pattern recognition, image analysis, computer vision, and applications. Springer; 2015. p. 559-66%@ 3319257501.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Furdea A, Halder S, et al. A Brain-computer interface controlled auditory event-related potential (P300) spelling system for locked-in patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1157(1):90–100. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04122.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Xu G, Wang L, Wang J, editors. Research on auditory BCI based on wavelet transform. Virtual Environments Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems (VECIMS), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Vienne J, Lecciso G, Constantinescu IO, et al. Differential effects of sodium oxybate and baclofen on EEG, sleep, neurobehavioral performance, and memory. Sleep. 2012;35(8):1071–1083. 1071-83%@ 0161-8105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugler EM, Ruf CA, Halder S, et al. Design and implementation of a P300-based brain-computer interface for controlling an internet browser. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18(6):599-609. Epub 2010/09/02. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2068059. PubMed PMID: 20805058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayaud L, Filipe S, Pétégnief L, et al. Robust brain-computer interface for virtual keyboard (RoBIK): project results. IRBM; 2013. P. 131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayaud L, Cabanilles S, Azabou E. Patient needs analysis for brain-computer interfaces. In: Clerc M, Bougrain L, Lotte F, editors. Brain computer interfaces. Great Britain: ISTE Editions. Croydon, CR0 4YY; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Renard Y, Lotte F, Gibert G, et al. OpenViBE: an open-source software platform to design, test, and use brain–computer interfaces in real and virtual environments. Presence-Teleop Virt Environ. 2010;19(1):35–53. 10.1162/pres.19.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlögl A. GDF-A general dataformat for biosignals. arXiv preprint cs/0608052. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Congedo M, Korczowski L, Delorme A. Spatio-temporal common pattern: a companion method for ERP analysis in the time domain. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;267:74–88. 74-88%@ 0165-270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congedo M, Gouy-Pailler C, Jutten C. On the blind source separation of human electroencephalogram by approximate joint diagonalization of second order statistics. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(12):2677–2686. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakotomamonjy A, Guigue V, Mallet G, et al. Ensemble of SVMs for improving brain computer interface P300 speller performances. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2005;3696:45–50. PubMed PMID: ISI:000232193800008.
   Google Scholar
• Lotte F, Congedo M, Lécuyer A, et al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. J. Neural Eng. 2007;4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barachant A, Andreev A, Congedo M, editors. The Riemannian Potato: an automatic and adaptive artifact detection method for online experiments using Riemannian geometry. TOBI Workshop lV. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Congedo M. EEG Source Analysis Université de Grenoble; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, et al. Multiclass brain-computer interface classification by Riemannian geometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59(4):920-928. Epub 2011/10/20. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2172210. PubMed PMID: 22010143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, Kübler A. The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain–computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis–a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci. 2010;4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart H, Wilcock A. Improving the communication rate for symbol based, scanning voice output device users. Technol Disabil. 2000;13(3):141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Rencher X. Methods of multivariate data. Analysis. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Pernet CR, Chauveau N, Gaspar C, et al. Limo EEG: a toolbox for hierarchical linear modeling of electroencephalographic data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Sellers E, Mellinger J, et al. A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(8):1909–1916. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccio A, Leotta F, Tiripicchio S, et al. Can severe Acquired Brain Injury users control a communication application operated through a P300-based brain computer interface? Age. 2011;41(46):24.
   Google Scholar
• Cipresso P, Carelli L, Solca F, et al. The use of P300‐based BCIs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from augmentative and alternative communication to cognitive assessment. Brain Behav. 2012; 2:479–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guger C, Daban S, Sellers E, et al. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain? computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci Lett. 2009;462(1):94–98. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvoni S, Volpato C, Cavinato M, et al. P300-based brain–computer interface communication: evaluation and follow-up in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurosci 2009;3(60).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kübler A, Birbaumer N. Brain–computer interfaces and com- munication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2658–2666. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecotti H, Rivet B, Congedo M, et al. A robust sensor-selection method for P300 brain–computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(1):016001. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, et al. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011;2011:156869. Epub 2011/01/22. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869. PubMed PMID: 21253357; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3021840.
   Google Scholar
• Congedo M, Goyat M, Tarrin N, et al., editors. Brain Invaders’: a prototype of an open-source P300-based video game working with the OpenViBE platform. Proceedings of the 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference 2011; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jin SH, Lin P, Hallett M. Abnormal reorganization of functional cortical small-world networks in focal hand dystonia. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28682. Epub 2011/12/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028682. PubMed PMID: 22174867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3236757.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend G, LaPallo BK, Boulay CB, et al. A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121(7):1109-1120. Epub 2010/03/30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.030. PubMed PMID: 20347387; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2879474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congedo M. Introducing the logistic discriminant function in electroencephalography. J Neurother. 2003;7(2):5–23. 10.1300/J184v07n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Serby H, Yom-Tov E, Inbar GF. An improved P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(1):89–98. 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.841878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, Ramoser H, McFarland DJ, et al. EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(3):326–333. 10.1109/86.712231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hosmer DW Jr, Wang CY, Lin IC, et al. A computer program for stepwise logistic regression using maximum likelihood estimation. Comput Prog Biomed. 1978;8(2):121–134 . Epub 1978/06/01 PubMed PMID: 668307. 10.1016/0010-468X(78)90047-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Congedo M, Barachant A, Andreev A A New generation of brain-computer interface based on riemannian geometry. arXiv preprint arXiv:13108115. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Guger C, Krausz G, Allison BZ, et al. Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain–computer interfaces. Front Neurosci. 2012;6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar