References
- Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(2):164–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TRE.2000.847807.
- Vaughan TM, Heetderks WJ, Trejo LJ, et al. Guest editorial brain-computer interface technology: a review of the second international meeting. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11(2):94–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814799.
- Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. The third international meeting on brain-computer interface technology: making a difference. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14(2):126–127.
- Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. Special issue containing contributions from the fourth international brain-computer interface meeting. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):020201–2560/8/2/020201. Epub 2011 Mar 24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/020201.
- Huggins JE, Guger C, Allison B, et al. Workshops of the fifth international brain-computer interface meeting: defining the future. Brain-Comput Interface J. 2014;1(1):27–49.
- Huggins JE, Wolpaw JR. Papers from the fifth international brain-computer interface meeting. preface. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(3):030301–2560/11/3/030301. Epub 2014 May 19.
- Daly JJ, Huggins JE. Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S1–7.
- Huggins JE, Guger C, Ziat M, et al. workshops of the sixth international brain-computer interface meeting: Brain-Computer Interfaces past, present, and future. Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2017;4(1–2):3–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1275488.
- Huggins JE, Müller-Putz G, Wolpaw JR. The sixth international brain-computer interface meeting: advances in basic and clinical research. Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2017;4(1–2):1–2.
- Huggins JE, Guger C, Aarnoutse E, et al. Workshops of the seventh international brain-computer interface meeting: not getting lost in translation. Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2019;6(3):71–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2019.1697163.
- Huggins JE, Slutzky MW. Articles from the seventh international brain-computer interface meeting. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2019;6(4):103–105.
- Besio WG, Koka K, Aakula R, et al. Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for laplacian electroencephalography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53(5):926–933. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2005.863887.
- Koka K, Besio WG. Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;165(2):216–222.
- Liu X, Makeyev O, Besio W. Improved spatial resolution of electroencephalogram using tripolar concentric ring electrode sensors. J Sens. 2020.
- Besio WG, Martinez-Juarez IE, Makeyev O, et al. High-frequency oscillations recorded on the scalp of patients with epilepsy using tripolar concentric ring electrodes. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2014;2:2000111.
- Toole C, Martinez-Juárez IE, Gaitanis JN, et al. Source localization of high frequency activity in tripolar electroencephalography of epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;101:106519.
- Besio W, Cao H, Zhou P. Application of tripolar concentric electrodes and pre-feature selection algorithm for brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2008;16(2):191–194.
- Boudria Y, Feltane A, Besio W. Significant improvement in one dimensional cursor control using laplacian electroencephalography over electroencephalography. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(3):35014.
- Alzahrani SI, Anderson CW. A comparison of conventional and tri-polar eeg electrodes for decoding real and imaginary finger movements from one hand. Int J Neural Syst. 2021;31(9):2150036.
- Besio W, Sharma V, Spaulding J. The effects of concentric ring electrode electrical stimulation on rat skin. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(3):1111–1118.
- Rogel-Salazar G, Luna-Munguía H, Stevens KE, et al. Transcranial focal electrical stimulation via tripolar concentric ring electrodes does not modify the short- and long-term memory formation in rats evaluated in the novel object recognition test. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27(1):154–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.01.006.
- Besio WG, Koka K, Cole AJ. Effects of noninvasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. Epilepsia. 2007;48(12):2273–2279.
- Besio WG, Makeyev O, Medvedev A, et al. Effects of transcranial focal electrical stimulation via tripolar concentric ring electrodes on pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in rats. Epilepsy Res. 2013;105(1–2):42–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.12.002.
- Makeyev O, Liu X, Luna-Munguia H, et al. Toward a noninvasive automatic seizure control system in rats with transcranial focal stimulations via tripolar concentric ring electrodes. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20(4):422–431. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2197865.
- Makeyev O, Luna-Munguia H, Rogel-Salazar G, et al. Noninvasive transcranial focal stimulation via tripolar concentric ring electrodes lessens behavioral seizure activity of recurrent pentylenetetrazole administrations in rats. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21(3):383–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2198244.
- Besio WG, Liu X, Wang L, et al. Transcutaneous focal electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes reduces synchrony induced by pentylenetetrazole in beta and gamma bands in rats. Int J Neural Syst. 2011;21(2):139–149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065711002729.
- Valdes-Cruz A, Villasana-Salazar B, Williams B, et al. Transcranial focal electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes in freely moving cats: antiepileptogenic and postictal effects. Exp Neurol. 2019;320:113012.
- Besio W, Cuellar-Herrera M, Luna-Munguia H, et al. Effects of transcranial focal electrical stimulation alone and associated with a sub-effective dose of diazepam on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus and subsequent neuronal damage in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;28(3):432–436. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.06.021.
- Santana-Gomez CE, Alcántara-González D, Luna-Munguía H, et al. Transcranial focal electrical stimulation reduces the convulsive expression and amino acid release in the hippocampus during pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;49:33–39.
- Perez-Perez D, Castañeda-Cabral JL, Orozco-Suárez S, et al. Noninvasive transcranial focal stimulation affects the convulsive seizure-induced P-glycoprotein expression and function in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;115:107659.
- Hansen N, Kahn AK, Zelle D, et al. Amplitudes of pain-related evoked potentials are useful to detect small fiber involvement in painful mixed fiber neuropathies in addition to quantitative sensory testing an electrophysiological study. Front Neurol. 2015;6:244.
- Oh KJ, Kim SH, Lee Y-H, et al. Pain-related evoked potential in healthy adults. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(1):108–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.108.
- Ozgul OS, Maier C, Enax-Krumova EK, et al. High test-retest-reliability of pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2017;647:110–116.
- Papagianni A, Siedler G, Sommer C, et al. Capsaicin 8% patch reversibly reduces A-delta fiber evoked potential amplitudes. Pain Rep. 2018;3(2):e644. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000644.
- Uceyler N, Kahn A-K, Kramer D, et al. Impaired small fiber conduction in patients with fabry disease: a neurophysiological case-control study. BMC Neurol. 2013;13(1):47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-47.
- Uceyler N, Zeller D, Kahn A-K, et al. Small fibre pathology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Brain. 2013;136(6):1857–1867. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt053.
- Katsarava Z, Ayzenberg I, Sack F, et al. A novel method of eliciting pain-related potentials by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Headache. 2006;46(10):1511–1517. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00446.x.
- Khatoun A, Asamoah B, Mc Laughlin M. Investigating the feasibility of epicranial cortical stimulation using concentric-ring electrodes: a novel minimally invasive neuromodulation method. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:773.
- Miller KJ, Hermes D, Staff NP. The current state of electrocorticography-based brain-computer interfaces. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(1):E2.
- Wang W, Collinger JL, Degenhart AD, et al. An electrocorticographic brain interface in an individual with tetraplegia. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e55344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055344.
- Brunner P, Ritaccio AL, Emrich JF, et al. Rapid communication with a “p300” matrix speller using electrocorticographic signals (ECoG). Front Neurosci. 2011;5:5.
- Vansteensel MJ, Pels EGM, Bleichner MG, et al. Fully implanted brain-computer interface in a locked-in patient with ALS. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2060–2066. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608085.
- Lotte F, Brumberg JS, Brunner P, et al. Electrocorticographic representations of segmental features in continuous speech. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:97.
- Anumanchipalli GK, Chartier J, Chang EF. Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature. 2019;568(7753):493–498.
- Rabbani Q, Milsap G, Crone NE. The potential for a speech brain–computer interface using chronic electrocorticography. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16(1):144–165.
- Dijkstra K, Brunner P, Gunduz A, et al. Identifying the attended speaker using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals. Brain Comput Interfaces. 2015;2(4):161–173. (Abingdon, England). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2015.1063363.
- Miller KJ, Schalk G, Fetz EE, et al. Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4430–4435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913697107.
- Miller KJ, Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, et al. Spectral changes in cortical surface potentials during motor movement. J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2424–2432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3886-06.2007.
- Kapeller C, Ogawa H, Schalk G, et al. Real-time detection and discrimination of visual perception using electrocorticographic signals. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(3):036001. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aaa9f6.
- Miller KJ, Schalk G, Hermes D, et al. Spontaneous decoding of the timing and content of human object perception from cortical surface recordings reveals complementary information in the event-related potential and broadband spectral change. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(1):e1004660. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004660.
- Leuthardt EC, Moran DW, Mullen TR. Defining surgical terminology and risk for brain computer interface technologies. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:599549.
- Ogawa H, Kamada K, Kapeller C, et al. Clinical impact and implication of real-time oscillation analysis for language mapping. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:123–131.
- Kapeller C, Korostenskaja M, Prueckl R, et al. CortiQ-based real-time functional mapping for epilepsy surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(3):e12–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000131.
- Ogawa H, Kamada K, Kapeller C, et al. Rapid and minimum invasive functional brain mapping by real-time visualization of high gamma activity during awake craniotomy. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(5):912 e1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.009.
- Kohler F, Gkogkidis CA, Bentler C, et al. Closed-loop interaction with the cerebral cortex: a review of wireless implant technology. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2017;4(3):146–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1338011.
- Kramer DR, Lamorie-Foote K, Barbaro M, et al. Utility and lower limits of frequency detection in surface electrode stimulation for somatosensory brain-computer interface in humans. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(2):E2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.FOCUS19696.
- Schalk G, Kapeller C, Guger C, et al. Facephenes and rainbows: causal evidence for functional and anatomical specificity of face and color processing in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(46):12285–12290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713447114.
- Brice J, McLellan L. Suppression of intention tremor by contingent deep-brain stimulation. Lancet. 1980;315(8180):1221–1222.
- Lozano AM, Lipsman N. Probing and regulating dysfunctional circuits using deep brain stimulation. Neuron. 2013;77(3):406–424.
- Molina R, Okun MS, Shute JB, et al. Report of a patient undergoing chronic responsive deep brain stimulation for tourette syndrome: proof of concept. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(2):308–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.6.JNS17626.
- Opri E, Cernera S, Molina R, et al. Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(572). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7680.
- Schalk G, McFarland DJ, Hinterberger T, et al. BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(6):1034–1043. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827072.
- Guger C, Schlogl A, Neuper C, et al. Rapid prototyping of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001;9(1):49–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/7333.918276.
- Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, et al. Riemannian geometry applied to BCI classification. Springer; 2010.
- Barachant A, Congedo M. A plug & play p300 bci using information geometry. arXiv. 2014; 1409.0107.
- Kalunga EK, Chevallier S, Barthelemy Q. Using riemannian geometry for ssvep-based brain computer interface. arXiv:1501.03227 [cs, stat]; 2015.
- Li Y, Wong KM, Bruin HD. Electroencephalogram signals classification for sleepstate decision A riemannian geometry approach. IET Signal Process. 2012;6(4):288–299.
- Simar C, Cebolla A-M, Chartier G, et al. Hyperscanning EEG and classification based on riemannian geometry for festive and violent mental state discrimination. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:1225.
- Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, et al. Multiclass brain–computer interface classification by riemannian geometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(4):920–928. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2172210.
- Kalunga EK, Chevallier S, Barthélemy Q. Transfer learning for ssvep-based bci using riemannian similarities between users. in 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO); 2018:1685–1689.
- Rodrigues PLC, Jutten C, Congedo M. Riemannian procrustes analysis: transfer learning for brain–computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(8):2390–2401.
- Korczowski L, Congedo M, Jutten C. Single-trial classification of multi-user P300-based brain-computer interface using riemannian geometry. in 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2015:1769–1772.
- Barachant A. MEG decoding using Riemannian geometry and unsupervised classification. 2014. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/citations.
- Barachant A, Cycon R. Pushing the limits of BCI accuracy: winning solution of the grasp & lift EEG challenge. in 6th International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting, Pacific Grove, California, USA, 2016: 73.
- Horev I, Yger F, Sugiyama M. Geometry-aware principal component analysis for symmetric positive definite matrices. Mach Learn. 2017;106(4):493–522.
- Congedo M, Barachant A, Bhatia R. Riemannian geometry for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces; a primer and a review. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2017;4(3):155–174.
- Barachant A, Andreev A, Congedo M. The Riemannian potato: an automatic and adaptive artifact detection method for online experiments using Riemannian geometry. 2013: 19–20.
- Barthélemy Q, Mayaud L, Ojeda D, et al. The riemannian potato field: a tool for online signal quality index of EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(2):244–255. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2893113.
- Jayaram V, Barachant A. MOABB: trustworthy algorithm benchmarking for BCIs. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(6):066011.
- Clisson P, Bertrand-Lalo R, Congedo M, et al. Timeflux: an open-source framework for the acquisition and near real-time processing of signal streams, in BCI 2019 - 8th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference, Graz, Austria; 2019.
- Lotte F, Jeunet C, Chavarriaga R, et al. Turning negative into positives! Exploiting ‘negative’ results in brain–machine interface (BMI) research. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2019;6(4):178–189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2019.1697143.
- kaggle. 2018 Kaggle machine learning & data science survey. 2021 [cited 2021 July 10]. Available from: https://kaggle.com/kaggle/kaggle-survey–2018
- Congedo M, Barachant A, Andreev A. A new generation of brain-computer interface based on riemannian geometry. arXiv.org; 2013. ArXiv:1310.8115 [Cs, Math].
- Khazem S, Chevallier S, Barthélemy Q, et al. Minimizing subject-dependent calibration for bci with riemannian transfer learning. in 2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2021.
- PyRiemann/PyRiemann. Pyriemann. GitHub.2015 Available from: https://github.com/pyRiemann/pyRiemann
- Lotte F, Bougrain L, Cichocki A, et al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(3):031005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2.
- NeuroTechX. NeuroTechX/Moabb. 2017 [cited 2021]. Available from: https://github.com/NeuroTechX/moabb
- Reback J, jbrockmendel W, McKinney J, et al. Pandas-Dev/Pandas: Pandas 1.3.0. v1.3.0. Zenodo. 2021 [cited 2021].
- Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine Learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2021;12(85):2825–2830.
- Neuroscience, S.C.f.C. Sccn/Labstreaminglayer. 2018 [cited 2021]. Available from: https://github.com/sccn/labstreaminglayer
- Group TH. The HDF5® library & file format. [ cited 2021]. Available from: https://www.hdfgroup.org/solutions/hdf5/
- Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, et al. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-python. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:267.
- Timeflux. Timeflux/Workshops. 2021.
- Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60(6):84–90.
- Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. 2015;518(7540):529–533. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236.
- Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016;529(7587):484–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961.
- Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature. 2020;577(7792):706–710. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7.
- Schirrmeister RT, Springenberg JT, Fiederer LDJ, et al. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(11):5391–5420. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23730.
- Lawhern VJ, Solon AJ, Waytowich NR, et al. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(5):056013. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c.
- Muller KR, Anderson CW, Birch GE. Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11(2):165–169.
- Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M, et al. Classification of covariance matrices using a riemannian-based kernel for BCI applications. Neurocomputing. 2013;112:172–178.
- Jeunet C, Benaroch,C, Cabestaing F, et al. A user-centred approach to unlock the potential of non-invasive bcis: an unprecedented international translational effort. in CHIST-ERA; 2020. virtual.
- Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. in 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2009.
- Zander TO, Kothe C. Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025005–2560/8/2/025005. Epub 2011 Mar 24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005.
- Jayaram V, Alamgir M, Altun Y, et al. Transfer learning in brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Comput Intel Mag. 2016;11(1):20–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2015.2501545.
- Zanini P, Congedo M, Jutten C, et al. Transfer learning: a riemannian geometry framework with applications to brain–computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(5):1107–1116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2742541.
- Özdenizci O, Wang Y, Koike-Akino T, et al. Learning invariant representations from eeg via adversarial inference. IEEE Access. 2020;8:27074–27085.
- Benabid AL, Costecalde T, Eliseyev A, et al. An exoskeleton controlled by an epidural wireless brain-machine interface in a tetraplegic patient: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(12):1112–1122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30321-7.
- Eliseyev A, Auboiroux V, Costecalde T, et al. Recursive exponentially weighted n-way partial least squares regression with recursive-validation of hyper-parameters in brain-computer interface applications. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16579-9.
- Schaeffer MC, Aksenova T. Switching markov decoders for asynchronous trajectory reconstruction from ECoG signals in monkeys for BCI applications. J Physiol Paris. 2016;110(4 Pt A):348–360.
- Orsborn AL, Moorman H, Overduin S, et al. Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful neuroprosthetic control. Neuron. 2014;82(6):1380–1393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.048.
- Madduri MM, Burden SA, Orsborn AL. A game-theoretic model for co-adaptive brain-machine interfaces. in 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2021. p. 327–330.
- Perdikis S, Leeb R, Williamson J, et al. Clinical evaluation of braintree, a motor imagery hybrid BCI speller. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(3):036003. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/036003.
- Perdikis S, Leeb R, Chavarriaga R, et al. Context-aware learning for generative models. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021;32(8):3471–3483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3011671.
- Perdikis S, Leeb R, Millan JD. Context-aware adaptive spelling in motor imagery BCI. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(3):036018.
- Perdikis S, Millán JDR. Brain-machine interfaces: a tale of two learners. IEEE Syst Man Cybernetics Magaz. 2020;6(3):12–19.
- Perdikis S, Tonin L, Saeedi S, et al. The cybathlon BCI race: successful longitudinal mutual learning with two tetraplegic users. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(5):e2003787. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003787.
- Biasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2421. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z.
- Amiri S, Fazel-Rezai R, Asadpour V. A review of hybrid brain-computer interface systems. Adv Hum Comput Interact. 2013;8:187024.
- Armel KC, Ramachandran VS. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1523):1499–1506.
- Critchley HD. Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. Neuroscientist. 2002;8(2):132–142.
- Marini F, Tagliabue CF, Sposito AV, et al. Crossmodal representation of a functional robotic hand arises after extensive training in healthy participants. Neuropsychologia. 2014;53:178–186.
- Shokur S, Gallo S, Moioli RC, et al. Assimilation of virtual legs and perception of floor texture by complete paraplegic patients receiving artificial tactile feedback. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):32293. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32293.
- Voss P, Thomas ME, Cisneros-Franco JM, et al. Dynamic brains and the changing rules of neuroplasticity: implications for learning and recovery. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1657.
- de Vignemont F. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Conscious Cogn. 2011;20(1):82–93.
- Adama VS, Wu S-J, Nicolaou N, et al. Extendable hybrid approach to detect consciousness states in a CLIS patient using machine learning. in 10th EUROSIM Congress; Logroño, Spain; 2019.
- Roussel P, Godais GL, Bocquelet F, et al. Observation and assessment of acoustic contamination of electrophysiological brain signals during speech production and sound perception. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(5):056028. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abb25e.
- Kubler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, et al. The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PloS One. 2014;9(12):e112392.
- Andrich R, Mathiassen N-E, Hoogerwerf E-J, et al. Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: an AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technol Disabil. 2013;25(3):127–146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-130381.
- Liberati G, Pizzimenti A, Simione L, et al. Developing brain-computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Appl Ergon. 2015;50:139–146.
- Riccio A, Pichiorri F, Schettini F, et al. Interfacing brain with computer to improve communication and rehabilitation after brain damage. Prog Brain Res. 2016;228:357–387.
- Riccio A, Simione L, Schettini F, et al. Attention and P300-based BCI performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:732.
- Riccio A, Schettini F, Simione L, et al. On the relationship between attention processing and p300-based brain computer interface control in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:165.
- Schreuder M, Riccio A, Risetti M, et al. User-centered design in brain-computer interfaces-a case study. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59(2):71–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.07.005.
- Schettini F, Riccio A, Simione L, et al. Assistive device with conventional, alternative, and brain-computer interface inputs to enhance interaction with the environment for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a feasibility and usability study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S46–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.027.
- Riccio A, Holz EM, Aricò P, et al. Hybrid P300-based brain-computer interface to improve usability for people with severe motor disability: electromyographic signals for error correction during a spelling task. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S54–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.029.
- Riccio A, Leotta F, Bianchi L, et al. Hybrid P300-based brain-computer interface to improve usability for people with severe motor disability: electromyographic signals for error correction during a spelling task. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025028. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025028.
- Kübler A, Nijboer F, Kleih S. Hearing the needs of clinical users. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:353–368.
- Eidel M, Kübler A. Wheelchair control in a virtual environment by healthy participants using a p300-bci based on tactile stimulation: training effects and usability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:265.
- Ziebell P, Stümpfig J, Eidel M, et al. Stimulus modality influences session-to-session transfer of training effects in auditory and tactile streaming-based P300 brain-computer interfaces. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11873. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67887-6.
- Chavarriaga R, Fried-Oken M, Kleih S, et al. Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design. Brain Comput Interf(Abingdon, England). 2017;4(1–2):60–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1263916.
- Cunha JD, Perdikis S, Halder S, et al. Post-adaptation effects in a motor imagery brain-computer interface online coadaptive paradigm. IEEE Access. 2021;9:41688–41703.
- Roc A, Pillette L, Mladenovic J, et al. A review of user training methods in brain computer interfaces based on mental tasks. J Neural Eng. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abca17.
- Halder S, Leinfelder T, Schulz SM, et al. Neural mechanisms of training an auditory event-related potential task in a brain-computer interface context. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(8):2399–2412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24531.
- Blankertz B, Sannelli C, Halder S, et al. Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance. NeuroImage. 2010;51(4):1303–1309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.022.
- Hammer A, Vielhaber S, Rodriguez-Fornells A, et al. A neurophysiological analysis of working memory in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res. 2011;1421:90–99.
- Formisano R, D’Ippolito M, Risetti M, et al. Vegetative state, minimally conscious state, akinetic mutism and parkinsonism as a continuum of recovery from disorders of consciousness: an exploratory and preliminary study. Funct Neurol. 2011;26(1):15–24.
- Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, et al. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(2):99–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279.
- Nilsen AS, Juel B, Thürer B, et al. Proposed EEG measures of consciousness: a systematic, comparative review. PsyArXiv; 2020.
- Halder S, Juel BE, Nilsen AS, et al. Changes in measures of consciousness during anaesthesia of one hemisphere (wada test). NeuroImage. 2021;226:117566.
- Kathner I, Wriessnegger SC, Müller-Putz GR, et al. Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP (P300) brain-computer interface. Biol Psychol. 2014;102:118–129.
- Kleih SC, Nijboer F, Halder S, et al. Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(7):1023–1031. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.034.
- Han Y, Valentini E, Halder S. Prediction of tonic pain using support vector machines with phase-based connectivity features. 2021.
- Orlandi S, House SC, Karlsson P, et al. Brain-computer interfaces for children with complex communication needs and limited mobility: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:643294.
- Kinney-Lang E, Auyeung B, Escudero J. Expanding the (kaleido)scope: exploring current literature trends for translating electroencephalography (EEG) based brain-computer interfaces for motor rehabilitation in children. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(6):061002.
- Fouillen M, Maby E, Le Carrer L, et al. Erp-based BCI training for children with ADHD: motivations and trial design. GBCIC; 2017.
- Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewski D. The prospects of brain — computer interface applications in children. Open Med. 2014;9(1):74–79.
- Lim CG, Lee TS, Guan C, et al. A brain-computer interface based attention training program for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PloS One. 2012;7(10):e46692. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046692.
- Norton JJS, Mullins J, Alitz BE, et al. The performance of 9-11-year-old children using an SSVEP-based BCI for target selection. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(5):056012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aacfdd.
- House SC. Evaluation of a motor imagery electroencephalography brain-computer interface as an access technology for children (Doctoral dissertation). Toronto Canada: University of Toronto; 2018.
- Jadavji Z, Zhang J, Paffrath B, et al. Can children with perinatal stroke use a simple brain computer interface?. Stroke. 2021;52(7):2363–2370. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030596.
- Kinney-Lang E, Kelly D, Floreani ED, et al. Advancing brain-computer interface applications for severely disabled children through a multidisciplinary national network: summary of the inaugural pediatric bci canada meeting. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14(530). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.593883.
- Kelly D, Jadavji Z, Zewdie E, et al. A child’s right to play: results from the brain-computer interface game jam 2019 (calgary competition). in 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC); 2020.
- Kinney-Lang E, Murji S, Kelly D et al. Designing a flexible tool for rapid implementation of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in game development. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:6078–6081.
- Mullins JL. SSVEP-based BCI performance in children. 2015.
- Park K, Kihl T, Park S, et al. Fairy tale directed game-based training system for children with ADHD using BCI and motion sensing technologies. Behaviour Inf Technol. 2019;38(6):564–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1544276.
- Friedrich EV, Suttie N, Sivanathan A, et al. Brain-computer interface game applications for combined neurofeedback and biofeedback treatment for children on the autism spectrum. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:21.
- Kinney-Lang E, Spyrou L, Ebied A, et al. Tensor-driven extraction of developmental features from varying paediatric EEG datasets. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(4):046024. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aac664.
- Kinney-Lang E, Ebied A, Escudero J. Building a tensor framework for the analysis and classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials in children. in 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO); 2018. p. 296–300.
- Forest C, et al. Maturational aspects of visual P300 in children: a research window for pediatric brain computer interface (BCI)*. in 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); 2020. p. 451–455.
- Kinney-Lang E, Ebied A, Auyeung B, et al. Introducing the joint eeg-development inference (jedi) model: a multi-way, data fusion approach for estimating paediatric developmental scores via EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(3):348–357. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2891827.
- Kinney-lang E, Escudero J. Programming for pediatrics: a literature review of brain-computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation in children. in International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting; Asilimar Conference Grounds: Pacific Grove, CA; 2016.
- Kirton A, Metzler MJ, Craig BT, et al. Perinatal stroke: mapping and modulating developmental plasticity. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(7):415–432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00503-x.
- Letourneau S, Zewdie ET, Jadavji Z, et al. Clinician awareness of brain computer interfaces: a canadian national survey. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0624-7.
- Europe, S.o.C.P.i., Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe (SCPE). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(12):816–824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162200001511.
- Parkes J, Hill N, Platt MJ, et al. Oromotor dysfunction and communication impairments in children with cerebral palsy: a register study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(12):1113–1119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03765.x.
- Cans C, Guillem P, Arnaud C, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(9):633–640.
- Kennes J, Rosenbaum P, Hanna SE, et al. Health status of school-aged children with cerebral palsy: information from a population-based sample. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(4):240–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162201002018.
- Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(5):292–296.
- Alcaide-Aguirre RE, Warschausky SA, Brown D, et al. Asynchronous brain-computer interface for cognitive assessment in people with cerebral palsy. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(6):066001. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa7fc4.
- Daly I, Billinger M, Laparra-Hernández J, et al. On the control of brain-computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(9):1787–1797. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.02.118.
- Daly I, Scherer R, Billinger M, et al. FORCe: fully online and automated artifact removal for brain-computer interfacing. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(5):725–736. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2346621.
- Scherer R, Billinger M, Wagner J, et al. Thought-based row-column scanning communication board for individuals with cerebral palsy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58(1):14–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.11.005.
- Huggins J, Garcia M, Tou S, et al. Comparison of brain-computer interface and eye-gaze interface technology for access to an untimed vocabulary test by people with cerebral palsy. in Perth, Australia: Australasian Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine; 2020.
- Warschausky S, Karlsson P, Huggins J. Brain-computer or eye-gaze interfaces: technical challenges and promise. in AACPDM 73rd Annual and IAACD 2nd Triannual Meeting; Anaheim, California; 2019.
- Kawakami M, Liu M, Otsuka T, et al. Asymmetric skull deformity in children with cerebral palsy: frequency and correlation with postural abnormalities and deformities. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(2):149–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1081.
- Minciu I. Clinical correlations in cerebral palsy. Maedica. 2012;7(4):319–324.
- Venkateswaran S, Shevell MI. Comorbidities and clinical determinants of outcome in children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(3):216–222.
- Marneweck M, Kuo H-C, Smorenburg ARP, et al. The relationship between hand function and overlapping motor representations of the hands in the contralesional hemisphere in unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(1):62–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317745991.
- Tou SLJ, Warschausky SA, Karlsson P, et al. Individualized electrode subset improves the calibration accuracy of an eeg p300-based brain-computer interface for people with severe cerebral palsy jne, in revision.
- Himmelmann K, Hagberg G, Wiklund LM, et al. Dyskinetic cerebral palsy: a population-based study of children born between 1991 and 1998. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(4):246–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00246.x.
- Philip SS, Dutton GN. Identifying and characterising cerebral visual impairment in children: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(3):196–208.
- Scherer R, Schwarz A, Müller-Putz GR, et al. Lets play tic-tac-toe: a brain-computer interface case study in cerebral palsy. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC); 2016.
- Wilson G, Stavisky SD, Willett FR, et al. Decoding spoken English from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(6):66007. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abbfef.
- Stavisky SD, Willett FR, Wilson GH, et al. Neural ensemble dynamics in dorsal motor cortex during speech in people with paralysis. eLife. 2019;8:e46015.
- Willett FR, Avansino DT, Hochberg LR, et al. High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting. Nature. 2021;593(7858):249–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2.
- Heelan C, Lee J, O’Shea R, et al. Decoding speech from spike-based neural population recordings in secondary auditory cortex of non-human primates. Commun Biol. 2019;2(1):466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0707-9.
- Herff C, Krusienski DJ, Kubben P. The potential of stereotactic-eeg for brain-computer interfaces: current progress and future directions. Front Neurosci. 2020;14(February):1–8.
- Gearing M, Kennedy P. Histological confirmation of myelinated neural filaments within the tip of the neurotrophic electrode after a decade of neural recordings. In: Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2020; 14.
- Bartels J, Andreasen D, Ehirim P, et al. Neurotrophic electrode: method of assembly and implantation into human motor speech cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;174(2):168–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.030.
- Herff C, Diener L, Angrick M, et al. Generating natural, intelligible speech from brain activity in motor, premotor, and inferior frontal cortices. Front Neurosci. 2019;13(November):1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01267.
- Makin JG, Moses DA, Chang EF. Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder–decoder framework. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(4):575–582.
- Herff C, Heger D, de Pesters A, et al. Brain-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:217.
- Moses DA, Leonard MK, Makin JG, et al. Real-time decoding of question-and-answer speech dialogue using human cortical activity. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3096. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10994-4.
- Moses DA, Metzger SL, Liu JR, et al. Neuroprosthesis for decoding speech in a paralyzed person with anarthria. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(3):217–227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2027540.
- Angrick M, Ottenhoff M, Diener L, et al. Real-time synthesis of imagined speech processes from minimally invasive recordings of neural activity. 2020;(2).
- Brumberg JS, Pitt KM, Burnison JD. A noninvasive brain-computer interface for real-time speech synthesis: the importance of multimodal feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018;26(4):874–881.
- Berezutskaya J, Vansteensel MJ, Aarnoutse EJ, et al. Open multimodal iEEG-fMRI dataset from naturalistic stimulation with a short audiovisual film. bioRxiv. 2021. 2021.06.09.447733.
- Aubinet C, Cassol H, Bodart O, et al. Simplified evaluation of CONsciousness disorders (SECONDs) in individuals with severe brain injury: a validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(5):101432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.09.001.
- Sanz LRD, Thibaut A, Edlow BL, et al. Update on neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol. 2021;34(4):488–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000951.
- Thibaut A, Panda R, Annen J et al. Preservation of brain activity in unresponsive patients identifies mcs star. Ann Neurol. 2021;90(1):89–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26095.
- Annen J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Brain-computer interfaces for consciousness assessment and communication in severely brain-injured patients. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:137–152.
- Annen J, Mertel I, Xu R, et al. Auditory and somatosensory p3 are complementary for the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Sci. 2020;10(10):748. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10100748.
- Coyle D, Stow J, McCreadie K, et al. Sensorimotor modulation assessment and brain-computer interface training in disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S62–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.024.
- Dayan N, Bigirimana AD, Mccann AE, et al. Towards answering questions in disorders of consciousness and locked-in syndrome with a smr-bci. In 8th Graz Brain-Computer Interface Conference 2019: Bridging Science and Application; Graz: Austria; 2019.
- Guger C, Spataro R, Allison BZ, et al. Complete locked-in and locked-in patients: command following assessment and communication with vibro-tactile p300 and motor imagery brain-computer interface tools. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:251.
- Guger C, Spataro R, Pellas F, et al. Assessing command-following and communication with vibro-tactile p300 brain-computer interface tools in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:423.
- Murovec N, Heilinger A, Xu R, et al. Effects of a vibro-tactile p300 based brain-computer interface on the coma recovery scale-revised in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:294.
- Spataro R, Heilinger A, Allison B, et al. Preserved somatosensory discrimination predicts consciousness recovery in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129(6):1130–1136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.131.
- Annen J, Blandiaux S, Lejeune N, et al. BCI performance and brain metabolism profile in severely brain-injured patients without response to command at bedside. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:370.
- Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, et al. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(6):600–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30031-6.
- Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis RC. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(6):1196–1202.
- Raffin E, Hummel FC. Restoring motor functions after stroke: multiple approaches and opportunities. Neuroscientist. 2018;24(4):400–416.
- Remsik AB, Dodd K, Williams L, et al. Behavioral outcomes following brain⇓computer interface intervention for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurosci. 2018;12. (NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00752.
- Biasiucci A, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nature Communications; 2018.
- Grosse-Wentrup M, Mattia D, Oweiss K. Using brain-computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025004.
- Sebastián-Romagosa M, Cho W, Ortner R, et al. Brain computer interface treatment for motor rehabilitation of upper extremity of stroke patients—a feasibility study. Front Neurosci. 2020;141056.
- Murovec N, Sebastian-Romagosa M, Dangl S, et al. Preliminary results of a brain-computer interface system based on functional electrical stimulation and avatar feedback for lower extremity rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems; 2020. 2020-October. p. 7–11.
- Rupp R, Rohm M, Schneiders M, et al. Functional rehabilitation of the paralyzed upper extremity after spinal cord injury by noninvasive hybrid neuroprosthesis. Proc IEEE. 2015;103(6):954–968. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2395253.
- Müller-Putz G, Rupp R. Neuroprosthetics and brain-computer interfaces. In: Spinal cord injury: a guide for clinicians and end users. Springer Nature; 2021.
- Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, et al. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):557–564. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61816-9.
- Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia.see comment. Nature. 2006;442(7099):164–171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04970.
- Pfurtscheller G, Müller GR, Pfurtscheller J, et al. ‘Thought’–control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett. 2003;351(1):33–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00947-9.
- Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, et al. EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: a step towards clinical practice. Neurosci Lett. 2005;382(1–2):169–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.021.
- Rohm M, Schneiders M, Müller C, et al. Hybrid brain-computer interfaces and hybrid neuroprostheses for restoration of upper limb functions in individuals with high-level spinal cord injury. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59(2):133–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.07.004.
- Muller-Putz GR, Rupp R, Ofner P, et al. Applying intuitive EEG-controlled grasp neuroprostheses in individuals with spinal cord injury: preliminary results from the MoreGrasp clinical feasibility study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019;2019:5949–5955.
- Ofner P, Schwarz A, Pereira J, et al. Attempted arm and hand movements can be decoded from low-frequency eeg from persons with spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43594-9.
- Ofner P, Schwarz A, Pereira J, et al. Upper limb movements can be decoded from the time-domain of low-frequency EEG. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182578. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182578.
- Schwarz A, Ofner P, Pereira J, et al. Decoding natural reach-and-grasp actions from human EEG. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(1):016005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa8911.
- Schwarz A, Pereira J, Kobler R, et al. Unimanual and bimanual reach-and-grasp actions can be decoded from human EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67(6):1684–1695. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2942974.
- Sburlea AI, Müller-Putz GR. Exploring representations of human grasping in neural, muscle and kinematic signals. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16669.
- Sburlea AI, Wilding M, Müller-Putz GR. Disentangling human grasping type from the object’s intrinsic properties using low-frequency EEG signals. Neuroimage: Rep. 2021;1(2):100012.
- Martinez-Cagigal V, Kobler RJ, Mondini V, et al. Non-linear online low-frequency EEG decoding of arm movements during a pursuit tracking task. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:2981–2985.
- Mondini V, Kobler RJ, Sburlea AI, et al. Continuous low-frequency EEG decoding of arm movement for closed-loop, natural control of a robotic arm. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(4):046031. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aba6f7.
- Müller-Putz GR, Mondini V, Martínez-Cagigal V, et al. Decoding of continuous movement attempt in 2-dimensions from non-invasive low frequency brain signals. In 2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2021.
- Kobler RJ, Sburlea AI, Müller-Putz GR. Tuning characteristics of low-frequency EEG to positions and velocities in visuomotor and oculomotor tracking tasks. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17713.
- Kobler RJ, Kolesnichenko E, Sburlea AI, et al. Distinct cortical networks for hand movement initiation and directional processing: an EEG study. Neuroimage. 2020;220:117076.
- Hammer J, Fischer J, Ruescher J, et al. The role of ECoG magnitude and phase in decoding position, velocity, and acceleration during continuous motor behavior. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:200.
- Hammer J, Pistohl T, Fischer J, et al. Predominance of movement speed over direction in neuronal population signals of motor cortex: intracranial eeg data and a simple explanatory model. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(6):2863–2881. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw033.
- Kobler RJ, Sburlea AI, Mondini V, et al. Distance- and speed-informed kinematics decoding improves M/EEG based upper-limb movement decoder accuracy. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(5):056027. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abb3b3.
- Kobler RJ, Sburlea AI, Lopes-Dias C, et al. Corneo-retinal-dipole and eyelid-related eye artifacts can be corrected offline and online in electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic signals. Neuroimage. 2020;218:117000.
- Korik A, Sosnik R, Siddique N, et al. Decoding imagined 3d hand movement trajectories from eeg: evidence to support the use of mu, beta, and low gamma oscillations. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:130.
- Korik A, Sosnik R, Siddique N, et al. Decoding imagined 3d arm movement trajectories from eeg to control two virtual arms-a pilot study. Front Neurorobot. 2019;13:94.
- Lennon O, Tonellato M, Del Felice A, et al. A systematic review establishing the current state-of-the-art, the limitations, and the desired checklist in studies of direct neural interfacing with robotic gait devices in stroke rehabilitation. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:578.
- Mane R, Chouhan T, Guan C. BCI for stroke rehabilitation: motor and beyond. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(4):041001.
- Mane R, Ang KK, Guan C. Brain-Computer interface for stroke rehabilitation. In: N.v. T, editor. Handbook of Neuroengineering. Singapore: Springer; 2021.
- Kwon OY, Lee M-H, Guan C, et al. Subject-independent brain-computer interfaces based on deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2020;31(10):3839–3852. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2946869.
- Zhang K, Robinson N, Lee S-W, et al. Adaptive transfer learning for EEG motor imagery classification with deep convolutional neural network. Neural Netw. 2021;136:1–10.
- Kuhner D, Fiederer LDJ, Aldinger J, et al. Deep learning based bci control of a robotic service assistant using intelligent goal formulation. 2018.
- Hartmann KG, Schirrmeister RT, Ball T. Hierarchical internal representation of spectral features in deep convolutional networks trained for eeg decoding. In International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI); Asilomar Conference Grounds: Pacific Grove, CA, USA; 2018.
- Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Tyler-Kabara EC, et al. Ten-dimensional anthropomorphic arm control in a human brain-machine interface: difficulties, solutions, and limitations. J Neural Eng. 2015;12(1):016011. 2560/12/1/016011 2560/12/1/016011. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016011.
- Flesher SN, Collinger JL, Foldes ST, et al. Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(361):361ra141–361ra141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083.
- Salas MA, Bashford L, Kellis S, et al. Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in humans elicited by intracortical microstimulation. eLife. 2018;7:e32904.
- Hiremath SV, Tyler-Kabara EC, Wheeler JJ, et al. Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex. PloS One. 2017;12(5):e0176020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176020.
- Lee B, Kramer D, Armenta Salas M, et al. Engineering artificial somatosensation through cortical stimulation in humans. Front Syst Neurosci. 2018;12:24.
- Johnson LA, Wander JD, Sarma D, et al. Direct electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex in humans using electrocorticography electrodes: a qualitative and quantitative report. J Neural Eng. 2013;10(3):036021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036021.
- Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, et al. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(222):222ra19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820.
- Davis TS, Wark HAC, Hutchinson DT, et al. Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(3):036001. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036001.
- Tan DW, Schiefer MA, Keith MW, et al. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(257):257ra138–257ra138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
- Chandrasekaran S, Nanivadekar AC, McKernan G, et al. Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees. eLife. 2020;9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54349.
- Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(5):345–359.
- Saal HP, Delhaye BP, Rayhaun BC, et al. Simulating tactile signals from the whole hand with millisecond precision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(28):E5693–E5702. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704856114.
- Okorokova EV, He Q, Bensmaia SJ. Biomimetic encoding model for restoring touch in bionic hands through a nerve interface. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(6):066033.
- Callier T, Suresh AK, Bensmaia SJ. Neural coding of contact events in somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29(11):4613–4627. (New York, NY: 1991). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy337.
- Kumaravelu K, Tomlinson T, Callier T, et al. A comprehensive model-based framework for optimal design of biomimetic patterns of electrical stimulation for prosthetic sensation. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(4):046045. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abacd8.
- Oddo CM, Raspopovic S, Artoni F, et al. Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans. eLife. 2016;5:e09148.
- Valle G, Mazzoni A, Iberite F, et al. Biomimetic intraneural sensory feedback enhances sensation naturalness, tactile sensitivity, and manual dexterity in a bidirectional prosthesis. Neuron. 2018;100(1):37 45.e7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.033.
- Bashford L, Rosenthal I, Kellis S, et al. The neurophysiological representation of imagined somatosensory percepts in human cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2021;41(10):JN-RM-2460-20.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021.
- Sellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11(5):449–455.
- Leeb R, Perdikis S, Tonin L, et al. Transferring brain-computer interfaces beyond the laboratory: successful application control for motor-disabled users. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59(2):121–132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.004.
- Holz EM, Loic Botrel L, Kübler A. Independent home use of brain painting improves quality of life of two artists in the locked-in state diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2015;2(2–3):117–134.
- Wolpaw JR, Bedlack RS, Reda DJ, et al. Independent home use of a brain-computer interface by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2018 e258-e267; 913: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005812
- Pels EGM, Aarnoutse EJ, Leinders S, et al. Stability of a chronic implanted brain-computer interface in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(10):1798–1803. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.020.
- Geronimo A, Simmons Z. TeleBCI: remote user training, monitoring, and communication with an evoked-potential brain-computer interface. Brain Comput Interfaces. 2020;7(3–4):57–69.
- Oxley TJ, Yoo PE, Rind GS, et al. Motor neuroprosthesis implanted with neurointerventional surgery improves capacity for activities of daily living tasks in severe paralysis: first in-human experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(2):102–108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862.
- Simeral JD, Hosman T, Saab J, et al. Home use of a percutaneous wireless intracortical brain-computer interface by individuals with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(7):2313–2325. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2021.3069119.
- Kübler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, et al. The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PloS One. 2014;9(12):e112392. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112392.
- Pels EGM, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF, et al. Estimated prevalence of the target population for brain-computer interface neurotechnology in the Netherlands. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(7):677–685. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317714577.
- Linse K, Aust E, Joos M, et al. Communication matters-pitfalls and promise of hightech communication devices in palliative care of severely physically disabled patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:603.
- Pitt KM, Brumberg JS. Guidelines for feature matching assessment of brain-computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):950–964.
- Pitt KM, Brumberg JS. Evaluating person-centered factors associated with brain-computer interface access to a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm. Assistive technology: the official journal of RESNA. 2021;1–10.
- Standards roadmap: neurotechnologies for Brain-Machine Interfacing IEEE Standards Association. 2020
- Freudenburg ZV, Branco MP, Leinders S, et al. Sensorimotor ECoG signal features for bci control: a comparison between people with locked-in syndrome and able-bodied controls. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1058.
- Geronimo A, Stephens HE, Schiff SJ, et al. Acceptance of brain-computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(3–4):258–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2014.969275.
- Hill K, Kovacs T, Shin S. Reliability of brain-computer interface language sample transcription procedures. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):579–590.
- Hill K, Kovacs T, Shin S. Critical issues using brain-computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):S8–15.
- Hill K, Romich B. A rate index for augmentative and alternative communication. Int J Speech Technol. 2002;5:57–64.
- Lenker JA, Koester HH, Smith RO. Toward a national system of assistive technology outcomes measurement. Assist Technol. 2021;33(1):1–8.
- McFarland DJ, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: optimizing information transfer rates. Biol Psychol. 2003;63(3):237–251.
- Pasley BN, David SV, Mesgarani N, et al. Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(1):e1001251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001251.
- Sadeghi S, Maleki A. Accurate estimation of information transfer rate based on symbol occurrence probability in brain-computer interfaces. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2019;54(44):101607.
- Robbins RA, Simmons Z, Bremer BA, et al. Quality of life in ALS is maintained as physical function declines. Neurology. 2001;56(4):442–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.56.4.442.
- Chavarriaga R, Carey C, Luis Contreras-vidal J, et al. Standardization of neurotechnology for brain-machine interfacing: state of the art and recommendations. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021;2:71–73.
- Paek AY, Brantley JA, Sujatha Ravindran A, et al. A roadmap towards standards for neurally controlled end effectors. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021;2:84–90.
- Initiative IB. Future Neural Therapeutics: technology roadmap white paper version 2. IEEE; 2020.
- Paek AY, Brantley JA, Evans BJ, et al. Concerns in the blurred divisions between medical and consumer neurotechnology. IEEE Syst J. 2021;15(2):3069–3080. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.3032609.
- Wexler A, Reiner PB. Oversight of direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies. Science. 2019;363(6424):234–235.
- Wexler A. Separating neuroethics from neurohype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(9):988–990.
- Marchetti M, Priftis K. Brain–computer interfaces in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a metanalysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(6):1255–1263.
- Wierzgała P, Zapała D, Wojcik,GM, et al. Most popular signal processing methods in motor-imagery BCI: a review and meta-analysis. In: Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2018. p. 12.
- Eiber C, Delbeke J, Cardoso J, et al. Preliminary minimum reporting requirements for in-vivo neural interface research: i. implantable neural interfaces. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021;2:74–83.
- Easttom C, Bianchi L, Valeriani D, et al. A functional model for unifying brain computer interface terminology. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021;2:91–96.
- Easttom C. BCI glossary and functional model by the IEEE P2731 working group. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2021;1–3.
- Zapała D, Hossaini A, Kianpour M, et al. A functional BCI model by the P2731 working group: psychology. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2021;1–10.
- Bianchi L, Antonietti A, Bajwa G, et al. A functional BCI model by the IEEE P2731 working group: data storage and sharing. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2021;1–9.
- Eke D, Bernard A, Bjaalie JG, et al. International data governance for neuroscience. PsyArXiv; 2021.
- Ienca M, Haselager P, Emanuel EJ. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):805–810.
- Garden H, Winickoff D, Frahm NM, et al. Responsible innovation in neurotechnology enterprises. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers; 05. 2019.
- Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006;442(7099):164–171.
- Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, et al. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012;485(7398):372–375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11076.
- Sauter-Starace F, Ratel D, Cretallaz C, et al. Long-term sheep implantation of wimagine(®), a wireless 64-channel electrocorticogram recorder. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:847.
- Larzabal C, Auboiroux V, Karakas S, et al. The riemannian spatial pattern method: mapping and clustering movement imagery using riemannian geometry. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(5):056014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abf291.
- Brandman DM, Hosman T, Saab J, et al. Rapid calibration of an intracortical brain-computer interface for people with tetraplegia. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(2):026007. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa9ee7.
- Gunduz A, Opri E, Gilron R, et al. Adding wisdom to ‘smart’ bioelectronic systems: a design framework for physiologic control including practical examples. Bioelectron Med (Lond). 2019;2(1):29–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2217/bem-2019-0008.
- Allison BZ. Toward ubiquitous BCIs. In: P. G. GB, B A, editors. Brain-computer interfaces. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 357–387.
- Burwell S, Sample M, Racine E. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):60.
- Haselager P, Mecacci G, Wolkenstein A, et al. Can BCIs enlighten the concept of agency? A plea for an experimental philosophy of Neurotechnology. In: Friedrich O, editors. Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence: philosophical, ethical, legal and social implications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2021. p. 55.
- Schneider MJ, Fins JJ, Wolpaw JR. Ethical issues in BCI research. In: Wolpaw JR, and Wolpaw EW, editors. Brain–Computer Interfaces. Principles and practice. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 373–383.
- Yuste R, Goering S, Arcas BAY, et al. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature. 2017;551(7679):159–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a.
- Nijboer F, Clausen J, Allison BZ, et al. The asilomar survey: stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing. Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):541–578. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6.
- Pham M, Goering S, Sample M, et al. Asilomar survey: researcher perspectives on ethical principles and guidelines for BCI research. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2018;5(4):97–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2018.1530010.
- Sample M, Sattler S, Blain-Moraes S, et al. Do publics share experts’ concerns about brain–computer interfaces? A trinational survey on the ethics of neural technology. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2020;45(6):1242–1270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919879220.
- Cinel C, Valeriani D, Poli R. Neurotechnologies for human cognitive augmentation: current state of the art and future prospects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:13.
- Matran-Fernandez A, Poli R. Brain-computer interfaces for detection and localization of targets in aerial images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(4):959–969.
- Matran-Fernandez A, Poli R, Hu D. Towards the automated localisation of targets in rapid image-sifting by collaborative brain-computer interfaces. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178498.
- Poli R, Valeriani D, Cinel C. Collaborative brain-computer interface for aiding decision-making. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102693.
- Valeriani D, Cinel C, Poli R. Group augmentation in realistic visual-search decisions via a hybrid brain-computer interface. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7772.
- Valeriani D, Poli R, Cinel C. Enhancement of group perception via a collaborative brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(6):1238–1248.
- Valeriani D, Poli R, Schwenker F. Cyborg groups enhance face recognition in crowded environments. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0212935.
- Curtin A, Ayaz H, Tang Y, et al. Enhancing neural efficiency of cognitive processing speed via training and neurostimulation: an fNIRS and TMS study. Neuroimage. 2019;198:73–82.
- McKendrick R, Falcone B, Scheldrup M, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on baseline and slope of prefrontal cortex hemodynamics during a spatial working memory task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:64.
- Rao RP, Stocco A, Bryan M, et al. A direct brain-to-brain interface in humans. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111332.
- Yang Y, Qiao S, Sani OG, et al. Modelling and prediction of the dynamic responses of large-scale brain networks during direct electrical stimulation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(4):324–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00666-w.
- Shanechi MM. Brain-machine interfaces from motor to mood. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(10):1554–1564.
- Dehais F, Karwowski W, Ayaz H, et al. Brain at work and in everyday life as the next frontier: grand field challenges for neuroergonomics. Front Neuroergonom. 2020;1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2020.583733.
- Neuroergonomics: the brain at work and in everyday life. London: Academic Press; 2018.
- Kosmyna N, Maes P. AttentivU: an EEG-based closed-loop biofeedback system for real-time monitoring and improvement of engagement for personalized learning. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(23):5200.
- Van Dijk J, Hummels C. Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. In 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction; Munich, Germany; 2014.
- Frey J, Hachet M, Lotte F. EEG-based neuroergonomics for 3d user interfaces: opportunities and challenges. Le travail humain. 2017;80(1):73–92.
- Jeunet C, Hauw D, Millán JDR. Sport psychology: technologies ahead. Front Sport Active Liv. 2020;2(10). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00010
- Di Fronso S, Fiedler P, Tamburro G, et al. Dry EEG in sports sciences: a fast and reliable tool to assess individual alpha peak frequency changes induced by physical effort. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:982.
- Callan DE, Dehais F. Chapter 9 - neuroergonomics for aviation. In: Ayaz H, Dehais F, editors. Neuroergonomics. Academic Press; 2019. p. 55–58.
- Fairclough SH, Lotte F. Grand challenges in neurotechnology and system neuroergonomics. Front Neuroergonom. 2020;1(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2020.602504
- Stone DB, Tamburro G, Fiedler P, et al. Automatic removal of physiological artifacts in eeg: the optimized fingerprint method for sports science applications. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12(96). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00096.
- Casso MI, Jeunet C, Roy RN. Heading for motor imagery brain-computer interfaces (MI-BCIs) usable out-of-the-lab: impact of dry electrode setup on classification accuracy. In 2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2021. p. 690–693.
- Dehais F, Duprès A, Blum S, et al. Monitoring pilot’s mental workload using erps and spectral power with a six-dry-electrode eeg system in real flight conditions. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(6):1324. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061324.
- Mühl C, Heylen D, Nijholt A, et al. Affective brain-computer interfaces: neuroscientific approaches to affect detection in Oxford Handbook of affective computing. Calvo R, Editors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 217–237.
- Nijholt A. Brain art. Brain-Computer Interfaces and artistic expression. Human-computer interaction series. London UK: Springer; 2019.
- Wadeson A, Nijholt A, Nam CS. Artistic brain-computer interfaces: current state-of-art of control mechanisms. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2015;2(2–3):70–75.
- Prpa M, Pasquier P. Brain-Computer Interfaces in contemporary art: a state of the art and taxonomy. In: Nijholt A, editor. Brain art. Brain-Computer Interfaces and artistic expression. London (UK): Springer; 2019. p. 65–115.
- King JL. Art therapy, trauma, and neuroscience: theoretical and practical perspectives. Routledge; 2016. p. 234. pages.
- Scott SM, Gehrke L . Neurofeedback during creative expression as a therapeutic tool. In: Contreras-Vidal JLeditors. Mobile brain–body imaging and the neuroscience of art, innovation and creativity. Cham Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 161–166.
- Scott SM, Raftery C, Anderson C. Advancing the rehabilitative and therapeutic potentials of BCI and noninvasive systems. In: Nijholt A, editor. Brain art: brain-computer interfaces for artistic expression. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland; 2019. p. 327–354.
- Valjamae A, et al. The brainhack project. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Workshop on An Application-oriented Approach to BCI out of the laboratory - BCIforReal ’17; ACM Press; 2017.
- Guger C, et al. The BR4IN.IO hackathons. In: A Neditors. Brain art. Brain-Computer Interfaces and artistic expression. London (UK): Springer; 2019. p. 447–473.
- Väljamäe A. TLÜ 13: Neurotheatre as a research tool by Aleksander Väljamäe; 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4xA0vU5XtY.
- Ramchurn R, et al. Brain-controlled cinema. In: Nijholt Aeditors. Brain art. Brain-Computer Interfaces and artistic expression. Cham Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 377–408.
- Rosenboom D, Mullen T. More than one—artistic explorations with multi-agent BCIs. In: Nijholt A, editor. Brain art. Brain-Computer Interfaces and artistic expression. Cham Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 117–143.
- Williams D. Evaluating BCI for musical expression: historical approaches, challenges and benefits, in brain art. In: Nijholt A, editor. Brain-computer interfaces and artistic expression. Cham Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 145–158.
- Hildt E. Affective brain-computer music interfaces-drivers and implications. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:711407.
- Pearlman E. Brain opera: exploring surveillance in 360-degree immersive theatre. PAJ: J Perform Art. 2017;39(2):79–85.
- Pearlman E. AI comes of age. PAJ: J Perform Art. 2020;42(3):55–62.
- Pearlman E, Ellen Pearlman RU, Durbas Iela, et al. Is there a place in human consciousness where surveillance cannot go? Noor: a brain opera. Leonardo. 2021;54(5):542–546. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02008.