Conceptualizing, researching and writing about pornography

References

• Attwood, Feona. 2009. ‘Dirty work Researching women and sexual representation.’ In Secrets and Silences in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, edited by Roisin Flood and Rosalind Gill, 177–187. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blinne, Kristen C. 2012. ‘Auto (Erotic) Ethnography.’ Sexualities 15 (8): 953–977. doi: 10.1177/1363460712459153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, Alice. 1997. ‘Metaphors of desire.’ In Language and Desire: Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy, edited by Keith Harvey, and Celia Shalom, 21–42. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault Michel. 1990. An Introduction, Vol. 1, The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Karen. 2017. ‘The Subject of Porn Research: Inquiring Bodies and Lines of Resistance.’ In Bodies in Resistance: Gender and Sexual Politics in the Age of Neoliberalism, edited by Wendy Harcourt, 307–323. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Natalie, and Sarah Kingston. 2014. ‘Experiencing Stigma as Sex Work Researchers in Professional and Personal Lives.’ Sexualities 17 (3): 329–347. doi: 10.1177/1363460713516333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, Janice M. 1990. Disorders of Desire: Sexuality and Gender in Modern American Sexology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, Janice M. 2002. Talk About Sex: The Battles Over Sex Education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, Janice M. 2009. ‘Transient Feelings: Sex Panics and the Politics of Emotions.’ In Moral Panics, Sex Panics: Fear and the Fight Over Sexual Rights, edited by Gilbert Herdt, 234–276. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, Janice M. 2014. ‘Is Sexuality Research “Dirty Work?” Institutionalized Stigma in the Production of Sexual Knowledge.’ Sexualities 17 (5-6): 632–656. doi: 10.1177/1363460713516338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, Janice M. 2015. ‘The Other Sex Work: Stigma in Sexuality Research.’ Social Currents 2 (2): 116–125. doi: 10.1177/2329496515579762
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2004. ‘So You Want to Teach Pornography?’ In More Dirty Looks: Gender, Pornography and Power, edited by Pamela Church Gibson, 1–7. London: BFI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, Walter. 1987. The Secret Museum: Pornography in Modern Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jiz, and Rebecca Sullivan. 2016. ‘Porn and Labour: The Labour of Porn Studies.’ Porn Studies 3 (2): 104–106. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2016.1184474
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Laura Helen. 2014. ‘How did you get Into This? Notes from A Female Porn Scholar.’ Colaboração Internacional 2 (2): 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, Alan. 2009. ‘Social Scientists Don’t say “Titwank”.’ Sexualities 12 (5): 629–646. doi: 10.1177/1363460709340372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasonen, Susanna. 2007. ‘Strange Bedfellows: Pornography, Affect and Feminist Reading.’ Feminist Theory 8 (1): 43–57. doi: 10.1177/1464700107074195
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Gayle. 1993. ‘Misguided, dangerous, and wrong: An analysis of antipornography politics.’ In Bad Girls and Dirty Pictures: The Challenge to Reclaim Feminism, edited by Alison Assiter and Carol Avedon, 8–40. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Lynne. 1998. ‘Only the Literal: The Contradictions of Anti-Pornography Feminism.’ Sexualities 1 (1): 43–62. doi: 10.1177/136346098001001003
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Clarissa. 2010. ‘Pornographication: A Discourse for all Seasons.’ International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 6 (1): 103–108. doi: 10.1386/macp.6.1.103/3
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Clarissa, and Feona Attwood. 2013. ‘Emotional truths and thrilling slide shows: The resurgence of antiporn feminism.’ In The Feminist Porn Book: The Politics of Producing Pleasure, edited by Tristan Taormino, Constance Penley, Celine Shimizu, and Mireille Miller-Young, 41–57. New York: The Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Clarissa, and Feona Attwood. 2014. ‘Anti/Pro/Critical Porn Studies.’ Porn Studies 1 (1-2): 7–23. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2014.887364
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Jeremy N., and D. J. Williams. 2016. ‘Getting off on sex Research: A Methodological Commentary on the Sexual Desires of sex Researchers.’ Sexualities 19 (1-2): 83–97. doi: 10.1177/1363460715583610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Linda. 1991. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the ‘Frenzy of the Visible’. London: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, Thomas. 2017. ‘“Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight”: A Personal Revisit.’ Porn Studies 4 (2): 131–138. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2017.1298898
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Linda. 2014. ‘Pornography, Porno, Porn: Thoughts on A Weedy Field.’ Porn Studies 1 (1-2): 24–40. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863662
   Google Scholar