What does it take to be a true conservative?

References

• Alexander, J. 2013. “The Contradictions of Conservatism.” Government and Opposition 48 (4): 594–615. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckstein, M. 2014. “Traditions and True Successors. A Few Pragmatic Considerations.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (3): 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., and A. Hamlin. 2004. “Analytic Conservatism.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 675–691. doi:10.1017/S0007123404000249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., and A. Hamlin. 2013 (revised: June 2014). “Conservative Value.” MANCEPT Working Paper 7 (13): 1–24. Accessed June 2014. www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/politics/our-research/research-clusters/manchester-centre-for-political-theory/working-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., and A. Hamlin. 2014. “Comprehending Conservatism: Frameworks and Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2): 227–239. doi:10.1080/13569317.2014.909262.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. 2005. “Why I, Too, Am Not a Conservative.” In Why I, Too, Am Not a Conservative: The Normative Vision of Classical Liberalism, 1–10. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E. 2009. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. 2007. “What Makes Me Conservative.” Daily Telegraph, September 8. Accessed February 14, 2014. www.telegraph.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. 2011. “Speech on the Big Society.” Milton Keynes, May 23. Accessed February 14, 2014. www.newstatesman.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2012. “Rescuing Conservatism: A Defense of Existing Value.” In Finding Oneself in the Other, edited by M. Otsuka, 143–174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, R. 2012 “Durch Die Mitte Zur Macht.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 21. Accessed February 26, 2014. www.sueddeutsche.de
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2007. “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology.” The Mead Project. Accessed March 4, 2014. www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey_1896.html. Originally published in Psychological Review 3 (1896): 357–370.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmann, K. 2004. Tradition und Verfahren. Norderstedt: BoD.
   Google Scholar
• Eccleshall, R. 2003. “Conservatism.” In Political Ideologies: An Introduction, edited by R. Eccleshall, A. Finlayson, V. Geoghegan, M. Kenny, M. Lloyd, I. Mackenzie, and R. Wilford. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, R. L. 2004. “Can We Know the Status Quo?” Constitutional Political Economy 15: 145–151. doi:10.1023/B:COPE.0000029640.32789.7e.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. 2008. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. 2006. “A Core Precautionary Principle.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1): 33–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00237.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, A. 2013 “Hayek, Buchanan and Conservatism.” MANCEPT Working Paper 12 (13): 1–18. Accessed May 15, 2014. www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/politics/our-research/research-clusters/manchester-centre-for-political-theory/working-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 2011. “Why I Am Not a Conservative.” In The Constitution of Liberty: The Definite Edition, vol. XVII, edited by R. Hamowy, 519–533. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. 2002. Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honderich, T. 1990. Conservatism. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1957. “Conservatism as an Ideology.” The American Political Science Review 51 (2): 454–473. doi:10.2307/1952202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. 1954. A Program for Conservatives. Chicago, IL: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, A. 2011. After Virtue. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. 1953. “Conservative Thought.” In Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology, edited by P. Kecskemeti, 74–164. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, E. H. 2013. “History, Value, and Irreplaceability.” Ethics 124 (1): 35–64. doi:10.1086/671389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minogue, K. 1985. Alien Powers: the Pure Theory of Ideology. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2006. “Comprehending Conservatism: A New Framework for Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (3): 359–365. doi:10.1080/13569310600924012.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. Z. 1997. “Introduction” in Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present, 3–31. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K. 2011. Conservatism. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hear, A. 1998. “Conservatism.” In Vol. 2 of Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig, 609–615. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1991a. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, 5–42. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1991b. “On Being Conservative.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, 407–437. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1996. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, R. E. 1984. “Community Organization and Juvenile Delinquency.” In The City, edited by R. E. Park and E. W. Burgess, 99–112. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payton, J. 2013. “Ruben’s Account of Traditions and True Successors: Two Modifications and an Extension.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (11): 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, J. 1970. Überlieferung: Begriff und Anspruch. München: Kösel.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, D.-H. 2013. “Traditions and True Successors.” Social Epistemology 27 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1080/02691728.2012.760661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. 2001. The Meaning of Conservatism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Seliger, M. 1976. Ideology and Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, T. 2010. “Cameron Declares Himself a Liberal AND a Tory.” Mail Online, May 17. Accessed February 14, 2014. www.dailymail.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Viereck, P. 2009. Conservatism Revisited: The Revolt Against Ideology. 3rd paperback. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vierhaus, R. 1997. “Konservativ, Konservatismus.” In Gesellschaftliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zu politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, edited by O. Brunner, W. Conze, and R. Koselleck, 531–565. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. 1992. Slippery Slope Arguments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. J., ed. 1957. The Conservative Tradition. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2012. “Realizing Property-Owning Democracy: A 20-Year Strategy to Create an Egalitarian Distribution of Assets in the United States.” In Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, edited by M. O’Neill and T. Williamson, 225–248. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar