The discursive (de)legitimisation of global governance: political contestation and the emergence of new actors in the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body

References

• Abromeit, H., and M. Stoiber. 2007. “Criteria of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by A. Hurrelman, S. Schneider, and J. Steffek, 35–56. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, A. 1999. “Shrimp/Turtle: Untangling the Nets.” Journal of International Economic Law 2 (3): 477–496. doi:10.1093/jiel/2.3.477.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, A. 2000. “Amicus Curiae Submissions in the Carbon Steel Case: Another Rabbit from the Appellate Body’s Hat?” Journal of International Economic Law 3 (4): 691–699. doi:10.1093/jiel/3.4.691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., and C. Lord. 1998. Legitimacy and the European Union. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., J. Tallberg, and A. Uhlin. 2010. “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors.” Global Governance 16 (1): 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2005. “From Demos to Demoi: Democracy across Borders.” Ratio Juris 18 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1111/raju.2005.18.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bown, C., and B. Hoekman. 2005. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector.” Journal of International Economic Law 8 (4): 861–890. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgi049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., and R. Keohane. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405–437. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. 2007. “Legitimacy in International Society or World Society?” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by A. Hurrelman, S. Schneider, and J. Steffek, 193–210. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K. 2007. The New Transnationalism – Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. 2012. Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsig, M. 2007. “The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis: What does the Beast Look Like?” Journal of World Trade 41 (1): 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C. 2002. “The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis.” World Trade Review 1 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1017/S1474745601001021.
   Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, A. 2007. “Legitimacy Deficits Beyond the State: Diagnoses and Cases.” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by A. Hurrelman, S. Schneider, and J. Steffek, 211–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. 2003. A Social Theory of the WTO – Trading Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., and J. M. Smith. 2002. “The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement.” UCLA International Institute. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4t4952d7.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. W., and R. O. Keohane. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D., and A. McGrew. 2002. Governing Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (2): 379–408. doi:10.1162/002081899550913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrelman, A., S. Scheider, and J. Steffek, eds. 2007. Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. C. 1999. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Process: A Primer.” Journal of International Economic Law 2 (3): 457–476. doi:10.1093/jiel/2.3.457.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, D., and J. Miranda. 2003. “Advocacy Before World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Panels in Trade Remedy Cases.” Journal of World Trade 37 (1): 69–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, K., and S. Lester. 2011. “WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–2010 – A Statistical Analysis.” Journal of International Economic Law 14 (1): 191–201. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgr007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroidis, P. 2001. Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado about Nothing. Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/01. New York: NYU School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• McCall Smith, J. 2003. “WTO Dispute Settlement: The Politics of Procedure in Appellate Body Rulings.” World Trade Review 2 (1): 65–100. doi:10.1017/S1474745603001356.
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. 2011. “Limits of Legitimacy and the Primacy of Politics in Financial Governance.” Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 52–74. doi:10.1080/09692290903025162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2007. “Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance.” European Law Journal 13 (4): 469–486. doi:10.1111/eulj.2007.13.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, A., and C. Irgel. 2001. “The Participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the WTO Dispute Settlement System.” Non-State Actors and International Law 1: 127–151. doi:10.1163/15718070121003482.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and M. Kleine. 2007. “Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU’s Treaty Revision Methods.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1111/jcms.2007.45.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. 2000. “Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space.” In Debating Governance, edited by J. Pierre, 167–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe – Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2010a. The European Union in Search of Political Identity and Legitimacy: Is More Politics the Answer? Institute for European Integration Research Working Paper Series (05/2010). Wien: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2010b. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’ Legitimacy.” In Working Paper for the Research College on the Transformation of Europe. Berlin: Otto Suhr Institute, Freie Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’.” Political Studies 61: 2–22. doi:10.1111/post.2013.61.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. 2003. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. 2006a. “What’s New in EU Trade Dispute Settlement? Judicialization, Public – Private Networks and the WTO Legal Order.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 832–850. doi:10.1080/13501760600837153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. 2006b. “The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation.” World Trade Review 5 (2): 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Shoyer, A. 2003. “Panel Selection in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings.” Journal of International Economic Law 6 (1): 203–209. doi:10.1093/jiel/6.1.203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. 2007. “Legitimacy in International Relations: From State Compliance to Citizen Consensus.” In Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics, edited by A. Hurrelman, S. Schneider, and J. Steffek, 175–192. Basingtoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, D. 2002. “The Rule of Law or the Rule of Lawyers?” The Journal of World Investment & Trade 3 (5): 769–792. doi:10.1163/221190002X00274.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M. 2011. “Discursivity of Global Governance: Vestiges of ‘Democracy’ in the World Trade Organization.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 36 (3): 240–256. doi:10.1177/0304375411418601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, M. 2014. Writing Global Trade Governance – Discourse and the WTO. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M. 2015. “Do Non-State Actors Enhance the Accountability of Global Governance? – the Case of WTO Dispute Settlement.” Global Policy and Governance 3 (1): 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2005. “The Complexities of the Global.” Theory, Culture & Society 22 (5): 235–254. doi:10.1177/0263276405057201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Borght, K. 1999. “The Advisory Center on the WTO Law: Advancing Fairness and Equality.” Journal of International Economic Law 2 (4): 723–728. doi:10.1093/jiel/2.4.723.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. 2005. “Managing Global Civil Society – The WTO’s Engagement with NGOs.” In The Idea of Global Civil Society – Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era, edited by R. Germain and M. Kenny, 156–199. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, K. D. 2002. “Contextualizing Normative Standards for Legitimate Governance Beyond the State.” In Participatory Governance, edited by J. R. Grote and B. Gbikpi, 35–50. Opladen: Leske.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2000. “Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 183–221. doi:10.1177/1354066100006002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar