562
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Children's interpretations of general quantifiers, specific quantifiers and generics

, , &
Pages 448-461 | Received 02 Jul 2013, Accepted 16 May 2014, Published online: 14 Jul 2014

References

  • Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., & Melartin, R. L. (1993). Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: Evidence from exploratory play. Child Development, 64, 711–728. doi:10.2307/1131213
  • Barner, D., Chow, K., & Yang, S. (2009). Finding one's meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 195–219. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001
  • Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219. doi:10.1007/BF00350139
  • Brandone, A. C., Cimpian, A., Leslie, S. J., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities. Child Development, 83, 423–433. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01708.x
  • Brandone, A., Gelman, S. A., & Hedglen, J. ( in press). Children's developing intuitions about the truth conditions and implications of novel generics vs. quantified statements. Cognitive Science.
  • Brooks, P. J., & Braine, M. D. S. (1996). What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Cognition, 60, 235–268. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(96)00712-3
  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Carlson, G. N., & Pelletier, F. J. (1995). The generic book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2010a). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34, 1452–1482. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01126.x
  • Cimpian, A., Gelman, S. A., & Brandone, A. C. (2010b). Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 261–276. doi:10.1080/01690960903025227
  • Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Drozd, K. (2005). Comments from our guest editor. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 13(2), 69–72. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1303_1
  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, S. A., Hollander, M., Star, J., & Heyman, G. D. (2000). The role of language in the construction of kinds. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 39 (pp. 201–263). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3 (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Halberda, J., Taing, L., & Lidz, J. (2008). The development of “most” comprehension and its potential dependence on counting ability in preschoolers. Language Learning and Development, 4, 99–121. doi:10.1080/15475440801922099
  • Hanlon, C. C. (1987). Acquisition of set-relational quantifiers in early childhood. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 113, 213–264.
  • Hanlon, C. (1988). The emergence of set-relational quantifiers in early childhood. In F. S. Kessel (Ed.), The development of language and language researchers: Essays in honor of Roger Brown (pp. 65–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hollander, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Star, J. (2002). Children's interpretation of generic noun phrases. Developmental Psychology, 38, 883–894. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.883
  • Huang, Y., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: Evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1723–1739. doi:10.1037/a0016704
  • Hurewitz, F., Papafragou, A., Gleitman, L., & Gelman, R. (2006). Asymmetries in the acquisition of numbers and quantifiers. Language Learning and Development, 2(2), 77–96. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0202_1
  • Jönsson, M. L., & Hampton, J. A. (2006). The inverse conjunction fallacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 317–334. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.005
  • Khemlani, S., Leslie, S. J., & Glucksberg, S. (2012). Inferences about members of kinds: The generics hypothesis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 887–900. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.601900
  • Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 1–47. doi:10.1215/00318108-2007-023
  • Leslie, S. J. (2012). Generics articulate default generalizations. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 41, 25–45.
  • Leslie, S. J., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Quantified statements are recalled as generics. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 186–214. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.12.001
  • Leslie, S. J., Khemlani, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2011). Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005
  • Mannheim, B., Gelman, S. A., Escalante, C., Huayhua, M., & Puma, R. (2011). A developmental analysis of generic nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua. Language Learning and Development, 7(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/15475441003635620
  • Meyer, M., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. (2011). Generics are a cognitive default: Evidence from sentence processing. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 913–918). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1
  • Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8
  • Papafragou, A., & Schwarz, N. (2005). Most wanted. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 13, 207–251. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1303_3
  • Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J., & Glucksberg, S. (2013). Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition, 126, 405–422. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010
  • Roeper, T., Pearson, B. Z., & Grace, M. (2011). Quantifier spreading is not distributive. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35, The proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 526–539). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1993). Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 231–280. doi:10.1006/cogp.1993.1006
  • Sloman, S. A. (1998). Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 1–33. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0672
  • Smith, C. L. (1980). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 191–205. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90057-0
  • Stanley, J., & Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language, 15, 219–261. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00130
  • Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A., Fu, X., & Zhu, L. (2012). Acquisition of generic noun phrases in Chinese: Learning about lions without an ‘-s’. Journal of Child Language, 30, 1–32. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000735

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.