Priming of early closure: evidence for the lexical boost during sentence comprehension

References

• Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., Jr., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 265–270. doi:10.3758/BF03212949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1994). Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 209–216. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. J. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., Van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 218–250. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Argument status and PP-attachment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 385–403. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9021-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., & Boehm-Jernigan, H. (1998). Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 684–719. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudewyn, M. A., Zirnstein, M., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2014). Priming prepositional phrase attachment: Evidence from eye-tracking and ERPs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 424–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 468–481. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. W., Mehler, J., & Bever, T. G. (1970). Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 243–254. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80058-5
   Google Scholar
• Carminati, M. N., van Gompel, R. P. G., Scheepers, C., & Arai, M. (2008). Syntactic priming in comprehension: The role of argument order and animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1098–1110. doi:10.1037/a0012795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–230. doi:10.1023/A:1005101313330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 259–278. doi:10.1002/lnc3.337
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. (2009). First language acquisition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Traxler, M. J., Williams, R., Mohammed, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 317–334. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00070-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz, H., Chang, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology, and function (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M., Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 727–796). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies ( PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut), Indiana University Linguistics Club, West Bend.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 55–78. doi:10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00065.x
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. T. (2011). What a rational parser would do. Cognitive Science, 35, 399–443. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 18(2), 135–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics, and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283–334. doi:10.1080/016909696387196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). An fMRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 702–713. doi:10.1002/hbm.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2004, March). Grammatical repetition and garden path effects. Paper presented to the CUNY Sentence Processing conference, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Raffray, C. N., & Pickering, M. J. (2010). How do people construct logical form during language comprehension? Psychological Science, 21, 1090–1097. doi:10.1177/0956797610375446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sag, I. A., Wasow, T., & Bender, E. M. (2003). Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Prosody. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 505–538). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227–267. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00647-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Keller, F., & Dubey, A. (2010). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 333–351. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008a). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008b). Syntactic priming during comprehension in three and four-year old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 188–213. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 156–163. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01462-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Swaab, T. Y., Boudewyn, M. A., Zirnstein, M., & Traxler, M. J. ( in press). Evidence for priming across intervening sentences during on-line sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2010). Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 925–937. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00249.x
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., & Traxler, M. J. (2012). Syntactic priming in comprehension: A dual mechanism account. In R. Mishra (Ed.), The relationship between language and thought (pp. 65–86). Munich: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, K. M., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2009). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35(1), 19–45. doi:10.1037/a0013984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2008a). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(1), 149–155. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2008b). Structural priming among prepositional phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Memory & Cognition, 36, 659–674. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2005, March). Syntactic priming in comprehension. Paper presented to the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2007). Lexical mediation and context effects in parsing. Brain Research, 1146, 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2008). Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 609–645. doi:10.1080/01690960701639898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Tooley, K. M., & Pickering, M. J. ( in press). Syntactic priming during comprehension: Evidence for the lexical boost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 204–224. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 102–123. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528–553. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gompel, R. P. G. (2013). Sentence processing. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Gompel, R. P. G., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 851–857. doi:10.3758/BF03196228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence Against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 225–258.
   Google Scholar
• Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75(2), 105–143. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2009). The unification space implemented as a localist neural net: Predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 331–346. doi:10.1007/s11571-009-9094-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Indefrey, P. (2009). Syntactic priming in German–English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 46, 1164–1172. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar