The effect of iconicity in the mental lexicon of hearing non-signers and proficient signers: evidence of cross-modal priming

References

• Baus, C. , Carreiras, M. , & Emmorey, K. (2012). When does iconicity in sign language matter? Language and Cognitive Processes , 28 (3), 261–271. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baus, C. , Gutiérrez-Sigut, E. , Quer, J. , & Carreiras, M. (2008). Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production. Cognition , 108 , 856–865. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. , & Shovelton, H. (1999). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica , 123 , 1–30. doi:10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentari, D. (1999). A prosodic model of sign language phonology . Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. , Martin, P. , & White, T. (1992). Forced choice recognition of sign in novice learners of British sign language. Applied Psycholinguistics , 13 , 185–201. doi:10.1093/applin/13.2.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi, E. , & Özyürek, A. (2013). Iconicity as a communicative strategy: Recipient design in multimodal demonstrations for adults and children. Journal of Pragmatics , 47 (1), 14–27. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M. , Gutiérrez-Sigut, E. , Baquero, S. , & Corina, D. (2008). Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language , 58 (1), 100–122. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuxac, C. (1999). French sign language: Proposition of a structural explanation by iconicity. Gesture-based Communication in Human-computer , 1739 , 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P. (1998). Gesture and speech production . Catholic University of Nijmegen. Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Postcards from the mind: The relationship between speech, imagistic gesture, and thought. Gesture , 7 (1), 21–38. doi:10.1075/gest.7.1.03rui
   Google Scholar
• Dick, A. S. , Goldin-Meadow, S. , Hasson, U. , Skipper, J. I. , & Small, S. L. (2009). Co-speech gestures influence neural activity in brain regions associated with processing semantic information. Human Brain Mapping , 30 , 3509–3526. doi:10.1002/hbm.20774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, M. , & Shih, S. (2006). Phonological priming in British sign language. In L. Goldstein , D. H. Whalen , & C. T. Best (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 8 (pp. 243–263). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gentilucci, M. , & Dalla Volta, R. (2008). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 61 , 944–957. doi:10.1080/17470210701625683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, E. , Müller, O. , Baus, C. , & Carreiras, M. (2012). Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish sign language lexical access. Neuropsychologia , 50 , 1335–1346. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, J. , & Beattie, G. (2003). Pragmatic aspects of representational gestures: Do speakers use them to clarify verbal ambiguity for the listener? Gesture , 3 (2), 127–154. doi:10.1075/gest.3.2.02hol
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. , & Schembri, D. A. (2007). Australian sign language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. D. , Creigh, P. , & Bartolotti, J. (2010). Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop-like task: Evidence for automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 22 , 683–694. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, G. R. , Armstrong, C. , Milroy, R. , & Piper, J. (1973). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken , R. W. Bailey , & N. Hamilton-Smith (Eds.), The computer and literary studies (pp. 153–165). Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 1–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. , & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language , 48 (1), 16–32. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klima, E. , & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language . Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science , 7 (2), 54–60. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M. , Chen, Y. , & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 389–450). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberth, A. K. , & Gamble, M. E. (1991). The role of iconicity in sign language learning by hearing adults. Journal of Communication Disorders , 24 (2), 89–99. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(91)90013-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, M. A. (1977). Iconic devices in American sign language. In A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American sign language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, R. P. , Mauk, C. E. , Cheek, A. , & Moreland, C. J. (2008). The form of children's early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning and Development , 4 (1), 63–98. doi:10.1080/15475440701377618
   Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P. , Wilkinson, E. , Villwock, A. , Piñar, P. , & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition , 118 , 286–292. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrel-Samuels, P. , & Krauss, R. M. (2001). Word familiarity predicts temporal asynchrony of hand gestures and speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 18 , 615–622. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. , & Meier, R. P. (1985). The acquisition of American sign language. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, volume 1 (pp. 881–938). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Orlansky, M. D. , & Bonvillian, J. D. (1984). The role of inconicity in early sign language acquisition. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders , 49 , 287–292. doi:10.1044/jshd.4903.287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ormel, E. , Hermans, D. , Knoors, H. , & Verhoeven, L. (2011). Cross-language effects in written word recognition: The case of bilingual deaf children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 15 , 288–303. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, G. , Sumer, B. , & Ozyürek, A. (2014). Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition. In P. Bello , M. Guarini , M. McShane , & B. Scassellatie (Eds.), 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1114–1119). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyürek, A. , Willems, R. M. , Kita, S. , & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 19 , 605–616. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian sign language. Sign Language Studies , 2 , 296–321. doi:10.1353/sls.2002.0012
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K. , Harrington, J. , & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology , 55 , 1339–1362. doi:10.1080/02724980244000099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodd, J. , Gaskell, G. , & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language , 46 , 245–266. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. , Eschman, A. , & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User's guide . Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, A. , & Marian, V. (2012). Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension. Cognition , 124 , 314–324. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf . Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Taub, S. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L. , Vinson, D. P. , Woll, B. , & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language learning is iconic: Evidence from British sign language. Psychological Science , 23 (12), 1443–1448. doi:10.1177/0956797612459763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolar, T. D. , Lederberg, A. R. , Gokhale, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2008). The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education , 13 , 225–240. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kooij, E. (2002). Phonological categories in sign language of the Netherlands: The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity . Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, Version 2. Behavior Research Methods , 20 (1), 6–11. doi:10.3758/BF03202594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, D.-F. , So, W.-C. , Yap, J.-M. M. , Tan, Y.-Q. , & Teoh, R.-L. S. (2011). Iconic gestures prime words. Cognitive Science , 35 (1), 171–183. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01141.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar