Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: correlational, integrated and explanatory neurolinguistics

References

• Carandini, M. (2012). From circuits to behavior: A bridge too far? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 507–509.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2006). What has functional neuroimaging told us about the Mind (so far)? Cortex, 42, 323–331. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70358-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embick, D. (2010a). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Embick, D. (2010b). Stem alternations and stem distributions (Unpublished manuscript). University of Pennsylvania. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~embick/stem-ms-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2005). Cognitive neuroscience and the English past tense. Brain and Language, 93, 243–247. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embick, D., & Poeppel, D. (2005). Mapping syntax using imaging: Problems and prospects for the study of neurolinguistic computation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000. doi:10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R. (1997). Neurons and memory. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Conversations in the cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., & King, A. P. (2009). Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grothe, B. (2003). New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 540–550. doi:10.1038/nrn1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle, M. (1959). The sound pattern of Russian mouton. s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J. (2011a). Computational phonology – Part I: Foundations. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J. (2011b). Computational phonology – Part II: Grammars, learning, and the future. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 153–168. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00268.x
   Google Scholar
• Henson, R. (2005). What can functional neuroimaging tell the experimental psychologist? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 193–233. doi:10.1080/02724980443000502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1951). Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffress, L. A. (1948). A place theory of sound localization. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 41, 35–39. doi:10.1037/h0061495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. K., Vijay-Shanker, K., & Weir, D. (1991). The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. In T. Wasow & P. Sells (Eds.), The processing of linguistic structure (pp. 31-81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Phillips, C. ( in press). Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. (2005). Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review, 22, 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. (2013). No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 905–916. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.779385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 428–435. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01239-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 362, 823–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausfeld, R. (2012). On some unwarranted tactic assumptions in cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–13. Article 67.
   Google Scholar
• Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343, 1006–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., Lahiri, A., & Eulitz, C. (2004). Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. P. (2006). What can't functional neuroimaging tell the cognitive psychologist? Cortex, 42, 428–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (1996). Order and structure ( PhD Thesis). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., & Lau, E. (2004). Foundational issues. Journal of Linguistics, 40, 571–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., & Roberts, T. P. L. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: An MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1038–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D., & Embick, D. (2005). Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 103–120). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D. (2012). The maps problem and the mapping problem: Two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 34–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharinger, M., Merickel, J., Riley, J., & Idsardi, W. J. (2011). Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: Sensor-and source-space data. Brain and language, 116, 71–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. N. (2002). Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1872–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single-route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. Mental Lexicon, 1, 85–123.
   Google Scholar
• Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie [Principles of Phonology]. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar