How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition

References

• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 390–398. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 137–153. doi:10.1162/0898929052880101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen, A., Scharinger, M., Strauß, A., & Obleser, J. (2014). Prediction in the service of comprehension: Modulated early brain responses to omitted speech segments. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 53, 9–26. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coane, J. H., & Balota, D. A. (2010). Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency, and retrieval test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63, 2376–2398. doi:10.1080/17470211003687546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43(1), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1643505
   Google Scholar
• Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105, 658–668. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16629300
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnigan, S., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Geffen, G. (2002). ERP “old/new” effects: Memory strength and decisional factor(s). Neuropsychologia, 40, 2288–2304. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12417459
   Google Scholar
• Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2010). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 379–399. doi:10.1017/S136672891000012X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461–1469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 360, 815–836. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. doi:10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Choi, M., Huang, T., Schilz, J., Topkins, B., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2010). The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception. Brain Research, 1361, 54–66. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 715–728. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10510866
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects, Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518–1530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 5, 196–214.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1230–1246. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 484–502. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. J., Corley, M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2010). Listening to the sound of silence: Disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3982–3992. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522–523. doi:10.1038/244522a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3581730
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574–588. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. doi:10.1080/01638539809545042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, T. (1950). Manual de pronunciación española [Manual of Spanish pronunciation]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 89. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paczynski, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). Multiple influences of semantic memory on sentence processing: Distinct effects of semantic relatedness on violations of real-world event/state knowledge and animacy selection restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 426–448. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2009). Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 4–9. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Vincent, D. J. T. (1980). Listening comprehension: The effects of sex, age, passage structure and speech rate. Educational Review, 32, 259–266. doi:10.1080/0013191800320303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Word and nonword repetition within- and across-modality: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 209–227. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SanMiguel, I., Widmann, A., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N., & Schröger, E. (2013). Hearing silences: Human auditory processing relies on preactivation of sound-specific brain activity patterns. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33, 8633–8639. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5821-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Sivonen, P., Maess, B., Lattner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: Evidence from early and late ERP effects. Brain Research, 1121, 177–189. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32, 8443–8453. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967–985. doi:10.1162/089892901753165872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 364–372. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2004). The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1068–1084. doi:10.1162/0898929041502670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394–417. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10093207
   Google Scholar
• Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32, 3665–3678. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science (New York, N.Y.), 167, 392–393. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5409744
   Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not Pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346, 165–168. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 39, 483–508. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3392191&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
   Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272–1288. doi:10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windmann, S. (2004). Effects of sentence context and expectation on the McGurk illusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 212–230. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar