Neural systems involved in processing novel linguistic constructions and their visual referents

References

• Abla, D., Katahira, K., & Okanoya, K. (2008). On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 952–964. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alishahi, A., & Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 32 (5), 789–834.
   Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints. Cognition, 116(1), 143–148. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbib, M., & Lee, J. (2008). Describing visual scenes: Towards a neurolingistics based on construction grammar. Brain Research, 1225, 146–162. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., Wasow, T., Losongco, A., & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of complexity and information structure on constituent ordering. Language, 76, 28–55. doi:10.2307/417392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1975). Language development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Niv, Y., & Barto, A. C. (2009). Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement learning perspective. Cognition, 113, 262–280. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. K., Gottschalk, E. A., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Linking rule acquisition in novel phrasal constructions. Language Learning, 59, 64–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D., Brody, R. E., Brooks, P. J., Sudhalter, V., Ross, J. A., Catalano, L., & Fisch, S. M. (1990). Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(5), 591–610. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg-Martin, E., & Hikosaka, O. (2009). Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 63, 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00441.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., Weisberg, J., & Martin, A. (2002). Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 545–551. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.5.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, H. M., Kaup, B., Raabe, M., & Greenlee, M. W. (2008). Evidence of fronto-temporal interactions for strategic inference processes during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 40, 940–954. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (1994). Generalization and connectionist language learning. Mind & Language, 9, 273–287. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00226.x
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1995). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Vol. 65).
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominey, P., & Boucher, J. (2005). Learning to talk about events from narrated video in a construction grammar framework. Artificial Intelligence, 167, 31–61. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominey, P. F. (2002). Conceptual grounding in simulation studies of language acquisition. Evolution of Communication, 4(1), 57–85.doi:10.1075/eoc.4.1.05dom
   Google Scholar
• Dominey, P. F. (2003, May). Learning grammatical constructions from narrated video events for human–robot interaction. Proceedings IEEE humanoid robotics conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dominey, P. F., Hoen, M., & Inui, T. (2006). A neurolinguistic model of grammatical construction processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2088–2107. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.12.2088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 301–306. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Nieto-Castanon, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Lexical and syntactic representations in the brain: An fMRI investigation with multi-voxel pattern analyses. Neuropsychologia, 50, 499–513. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Opitz, B., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: An fMRI investigation of different word types. Cerebral Cortex, 10(7), 698–705. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.7.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8), 684–691. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01767.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior expectations in sentence interpretation. PNAS 110, 8051–8056. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216438110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2005). The role of prediction in construction-learning. Journal of Child Language, 32, 407–426. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289–316. doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. (2006). Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 240–246. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, S18–S29. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (2008). Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (Vol. 132). New York: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The intermodal preferential looking paradigm: A window onto emerging language comprehension. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee, & H. Smith Cairns (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax. Language, speech, and communication (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoen, M., Pachot-Clouard, M., Segebarth, C., & Dominey, P. F. (2006). When Broca experiences the janus syndrome: An ER-fMRI study comparing sentence comprehension and cognitive sequence processing. Cortex, 42, 605–623. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70398-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 350–356.
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuza, E. A., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Starling, S. J., Tivarus, M. E., & Bavelier, D. (2013). The neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 127, 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 450–467. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D. (2006). Action verbs, argument structure constructions, and the mirror neuron system. In M. Arbib (Ed.), Action to language via the mirror neuron system (pp. 347–373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, A. W., & Earles, J. L. (2001). Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 250–273. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376–395. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, P., Jehee, J. F. M., & de Lange, F. P. (2012). Less is more: expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 75, 265–270. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D., Chang, G. Y., Chiao, J., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 427–438. doi:10.1162/089892904322926764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522–523. doi:10.1038/244522a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, T., & Olson, C. R. (2011). Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 19401–19406. doi:10.1073/pnas.1112895108
   Google Scholar
• Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Sequential expectations: The role of prediction-based learning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 138–153. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niv, Y., & Schoenbaum, G. (2008). Dialogues on prediction errors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 265–272. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordzij, M. L., Neggers, S. F., Ramsey, N. F., & Postma, A. (2008). Neural correlates of locative prepositions. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1576–1580. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science, 304, 452–454. doi:10.1126/science.1094285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opitz, B., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Brain correlates of language learning: The neuronal dissociation of rule-based versus similarity-based learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 8436–8440. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2220-04.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In M. Spivey, M. Joannisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics. (pp. 365–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagnoni, G., Zink, C. F., Montague, P. R., & Berns, G. S. (2002). Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 97–98. doi:10.1038/nn802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363. doi:10.1037/h0025953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Cappelle, B., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions and grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (Vols. 112, pp. 167–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, P. J., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2003). Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 574–583. doi:10.1162/089892903321662958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 747–750.
   Google Scholar
• Redgrave, P., & Gurney, K. (2006). The short-latency dopamine signal: A role in discovering novel actions? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 967–975. doi:10.1038/nrn2022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black, & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., Wig, G. S., & Stevens, W. D. (2007). Reductions in cortical activity during priming. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 17, 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599. doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skosnik, P. D., Mirza, F., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M. M., & Reber, P. J. (2002). Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning. NeuroImage, 17, 1306–1314. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014). Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), E4687–E4696. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323812111
   Google Scholar
• Stowe, L. A., Haverkort, M., & Zwarts, F. (2005). Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua, 115(7), 997–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 403–409. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209–253. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Foss, D. J., Seely, R. E., Kaup, B., & Morris, R. K. (2000). Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 581–595. doi:10.1023/A:1026416225168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2008). Babies and brains: Habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 16. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.016.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1934–1945. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungless, M. A. (2004). Dopamine: The salient issue. Trends in Neuroscience, 27, 702–706. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Mruczek, R. E., Arcaro, M. J., & Kastner, S. (2014). Probabilistic Maps f visual topography in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu277
   Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E. (2012). Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(3), 458–478. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 165–209. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, G., Chen, C., Jin, Z., & Dong, Q. (2006). Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: An fMRI training study. Neuroimage, 31(3), 1315–1326. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar