Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not

References

• Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24, 477–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L., & Chemero, T. (2013). The problem with brain GUTs: Conflation of different senses of “prediction” threatens metaphysical disaster. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 204–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1065–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1333–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron, 76(4), 695–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & Carnevale, G. (1993). New directions in research on language development. Developmental Review, 13, 436–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N., & Siegel, S. (2013). Attention and perceptual adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 205–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, H., Filetti, M., Wyble, B., & Olivers, C. (2013). Attention is more than prediction precision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 206–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressler, S. L., & Richter, C. G. (2015). Interareal oscillatory synchronization in top-down neocortical processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31C, 62–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., & Huettig, F. (2013). Discourse context and the recognition of reduced and canonical spoken words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 519–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Kidd, E., & Rowland, C. F. (2013). Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 350–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (in press). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1158, 81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K., Urbach, T., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Predicting the end of a speaker's turn; a cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations – signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. A., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). Prediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 211–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 862–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J., Bastos, A. M., Pinotsis, D., & Litvak, V. (2015). LFP and oscillations – what do they tell us? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 31C, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnepain, P., Henson, R. N., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Current Biology, 22(7), 615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), 8051–8056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 416.
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2008). Inference from absence in language and thought. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 121–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language, 96(1), 90–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, C. J., Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: It depends where you're coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1294–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H-W., Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). A “concrete view” of aging: Event related potentials reveal age-related changes in basic integrative processes in language. Neuropsychologia, 50, 26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Brouwer, S. (2015). Delayed anticipatory spoken language processing in adults with dyslexia – Evidence from eye-tracking. Dyslexia, 21(2), 97–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Guerra, E. (2015). Testing the limits of prediction in language processing: Prediction occurs but far from always. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2015), Malta.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (in press). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 460–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Olivers, C. N., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 138–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Singh, N., & Mishra, R. K. (2011). Language-mediated visual orienting behavior in low and high literates. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2004). Gold's theorem and cognitive science. Philosophy of Science, 71, 571–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., Murray, W. S., & Paul, S.-A. (2013). Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: An eye movement analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 601–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielar, A., Meltzer, J., Moreno, S., Alain, C., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Oscillatory Responses to Semantic and Syntactic Violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2840–2862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (in press). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review. doi:10.1037/a0038695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, F., Schlesewsky, M., & Staub, A. (in press). Dissociating Word Frequency and Predictability Effects in Reading: Evidence from Coregistration of Eye Movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (in press). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Elman, J. L. (2001). A connectionist investigation of linguistic arguments from poverty of the stimulus: Learning the unlearnable. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 552–57.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading. Neuroscience, 169(2), 654–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31, 883–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., Durrant, S., & Floccia, C. (2012). Activation of phonological and semantic codes in toddlers. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 612–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2014). Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: A study of children developing proficiency in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 264–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Plunkett, K. (2010). In the infant's mind's ear evidence for implicit naming in 18-month-olds. Psychological science, 21(7), 908–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Plunkett, K. (2011). Phonological priming and cohort effects in toddlers. Cognition, 121(2), 196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003a). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14(6), 648–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003b). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research, 43(16), 1735–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., & Huettig, F. (2014). Interference of spoken word recognition through phonological priming from visual objects and printed words. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Telling, A. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Early activation of object names in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 710–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Huettig, F. (2012). Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye movements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(1), 3, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Bruce Tomblin, J. (2010). Sequential expectations: The role of prediction-based learning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 138–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., & Russell, K. (2013). How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 977–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Altmann, G. (2003). Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(4), 314–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological review, 113(2), 327–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Troiani, V., Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2010). Neural processing during older adults’ comprehension of spoken sentences: Age differences in resource allocation and connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 773–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., & Saffran, J. R. (2009). Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition, 113(2), 244–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penolazzi, B., Angrilli, A., & Job, R. (2009). Gamma EEG activity induced by semantic violation during sentence reading. Neuroscience Letters, 465(1), 74–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Desaulty, S. (2008). A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation? Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1299–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2014). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, D., & Eliasmith, C. (2013). God, the devil, and the details: Fleshing out the predictive processing framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 223–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Clifton Jr, C. (2009). Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D., & Plaut, D. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition, 72, 67–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dijkstra, T., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2013). Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: Evidence from idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 762–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., Praamstra, P., & Huettig, F. (2013). The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M., & Mac Donald, M. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, A. (2013). What else can brains do? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 230–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2011). The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 371–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Benatar, A. (2013). Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1304–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair, M., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between Language Structure and Language Learning: The Suffixing Preference and Grammatical Categorization. Cognitive Science, 33, 1317–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P., Baroni, M., & Hasson, U. (2013). Processing of speech and non-speech sounds in the supratemporal plane: Auditory input preference does not predict sensitivity to statistical structure. Neuroimage, 66, 318–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 443–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Jensen, O., van den Brink, D., Weder, N., Schoffelen, J., Magyari, L., … Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2012). Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 33(12), 2898–2912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2010). Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiological Reviews, 90, 1195–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2014). The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1151–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Frank, S. L., Nijhoff, A. D., Hagoort, P., & Van den Bosch, A. (in press). Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv075
   Google Scholar
• Willits, J., Seidenberg, M., & Saffran, J. (2009). Verbs are looking good in language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2570–2575).
   Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. ( 2012). Age-related changes in the impact of contextual strength on multiple aspects of sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 49, 770–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2013). Two sides of meaning: The scalp-recorded N400 reflects distinct contributions from the cerebral hemispheres. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar