Learning to predict or predicting to learn?

References

• Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. (2007). Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 527–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Millotte, S., & Christophe, A. (2010). Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. Developmental Science, 13(1), 69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Sweeney, K., & Elman, J. L (2014). Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 1–14. doi:10.1016/jml.2014.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1987). Commentary: Mechanisms of language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 443–466). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language, 39, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Jones, M. W. (2005). A blue cat or a cat that is blue? Evidence for abstract syntax in young children's noun phrases. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, S. Ha (Ed.), The proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 109–121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F. (2002). Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 609–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Baumann, M., Pappert, S., & Fitz, H. (2014). Do lemmas speak German? A verb position effect in German structural priming. Cognitive Science, 39, 1113–1130. doi:10.1111/cogs.12184
   Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw, N. (2012). Model-based reinforcement learning as cognitive search: Neurocomputational theories. In P. Todd & T. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms and the brain, (pp. 195–208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69(6), 1204–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan, P., & Daw, N. D. (2008). Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(4), 429–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110(3), 293–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, B. B., Simon, D. A., & Daw, N. D. (2012). The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 1075–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doya, K., Samejima, K., Katagiri, K., & Kawato, M. (2002). Multiple model-based reinforcement learning. Neural Computation, 14(6), 1347–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48(1), 71–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2012). Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development, 83(1), 203–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9, 228–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Using speakers’ referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Psychological Science, 20(5), 578–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. (2004). N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1465–1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Early N400 development and later language acquisition. Psychophysiology, 43(1), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 227–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. S. Gazzanigga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 819–836). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1–8). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, J. K., Nappa, R., & Snedeker, J. (2015). Development of the first-mention bias. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 423–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: Evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1723–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Cascading activation across levels of representation in children's lexical processing. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 644–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2013). The use of lexical and referential cues in children's online interpretation of adjectives.. Developmental psychology, 49, 1090–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(2), 182–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. (2013). Thinking in words: Implicit verbal activation in children and adults (Ph.D. thesis). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Lai, V. (2012). Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1104–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119(1), 23–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(3), 484–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human “interaction engine”. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 39–69). London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. Macwhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake—but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 843–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Plunkett, K. (2010). In the infant's mind's ear: Evidence for implicit naming in 18-month-olds. Psychological Science, 21(7), 908–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F. (2001). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. D. (Eds.). (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Altmann, G. (2003). Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(4), 314–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, A. R., Gershman, S. G., Markman, A. B., & Daw, N. D. (2013). The curse of planning: Dissecting multiple reinforcement learning systems by taxing the central executive. Psychological Science, 24, 751–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118(3), 306–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1995). Language acquisition. In L. Gleitman & M. Lieberman (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language (pp. 135–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, 2, 64–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Medin, D. L. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation: Causal learning. (Vol. 34). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238–299. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Yuan, S. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 574–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, M., Thompson, R., Nobre, A. C., & Duncan, J. (2009). Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(46), 19569–19574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swingley, D., Pinto, J. P., & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition, 71(2), 73–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three-and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 188–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: HUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99(2), B63–B72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar